Acts 1:1-12
AI-GENERATED SUMMARY
This sermon initiates a series on the Book of Acts, presenting it as the sequel to the Gospel of Luke and the New Testament counterpart to the Book of Joshua; just as Joshua led the conquest of Canaan, Jesus (the greater Joshua) leads the conquest of the whole world through His church1,2. Pastor Tuuri argues that Jesus’ answer regarding the restoration of the kingdom to Israel (Acts 1:6-8) is not a denial, but a redefinition of the manner of restoration—achieved through the Holy Spirit’s power and witnessing to the ends of the earth3. The message emphasizes a “Bible-based means for Bible-based ends” approach to world missions, urging the congregation to “think globally and act locally” while adopting a multi-generational perspective for their grandchildren and great-grandchildren4. Practical application includes a call to participate in the “Adopted People Program” to reach unevangelized groups and a warning that the fields are “white to harvest,” requiring an accounting from every believer5,6.
SERMON TRANSCRIPT
Acts 1:1-12. Please stand for the reading of God’s word.
Acts 1:1-12. The former treatise have I made, O Theophilus, of all that Jesus began both to do and teach until the day in which he was taken up, after that he through the Holy Ghost had given commandments unto the apostles whom he had chosen. To whom also he showed himself alive after his passion by many infallible proofs, being seen of them 40 days, and speaking of the things pertaining to the kingdom of God.
And being assembled together with them, commanded them that they should not depart from Jerusalem, but wait for the promise of the Father, which saith ye, Ye have heard of me. For John truly baptized with water, but ye shall be baptized with the Holy Ghost not many days hence. When they therefore were come together, they asked of him, saying, Lord, wilt thou at this time restore again the kingdom to Israel?
And he said unto them, it is not for you to know the times or the seasons which the Father hath put in his own power, but ye shall receive power after that the Holy Ghost has come upon you, and ye shall be witnesses unto me both in Jerusalem, and in all Judea, and in Samaria, and unto the uttermost part of the earth. And when he had spoken these things, while they beheld, he was taken up, and a cloud received him out of their sight.
And while they looked steadfastly toward heaven, as he went up, behold, two men stood by them in white apparel, which also said, “Ye men of Galilee, why stand ye gazing up into heaven? The same Jesus which is taken up from you into heaven, shall so come in like manner as you have seen him go into heaven.” Then returned they into Jerusalem from the mount called Olivet, which is from Jerusalem, a Sabbath day’s journey.
We thank God for his word and pray that he would help us to understand it and apply it to our lives. We’re going to start the book of Acts today. We had scheduled originally here Bobby Gupta from the Hindustan Bible Institute, but he had to go back to India a little earlier than was originally planned apparently. So we’re going to just go ahead and dive into the book of Acts. And it really fits nicely anyway with world missions.
These first few verses of chapter 1 give us in essence an outline for the book of Acts and also give us the charge to go into all the world proclaiming the gospel. So it’s important that we see that as the primary theme here and it will fit nicely into our subject which we had scheduled Mr. Gupta to speak on, which is world missions.
So what I’m going to try to do here is first of all just look briefly at this text. It’s kind of an introduction to the book of Acts and then we’re going to try to think of some applications of this in our own lives individually and the lives of this church as well. We’ll look at the relationship in the context of all of that of the book of Acts to the rest of the scriptures particularly to Joshua. And also to the book of Genesis and the gospels and the Pentateuch briefly. We’ll do that at the end of looking at the text itself and then I may, if we have time, share a little bit of an article by Robert Dabney who was a southern Presbyterian, a portion of a sermon that he preached to the Presbyterian board of foreign missions in 1858 and talk about the relevance of that to this text and to where we’re at as a church as well and our culture and the world today.
So first let’s look at Acts chapter 1 and we’re going to look at the first 12 verses. Basically and I don’t have an outline today, but you will notice that there is an outline provided. Just so happens the providence of God that we enrolled our two girls in Christian Liberty Academy this year for homeschooling and Joanna’s Bible course is going through the book of Acts and so the handout that you could have picked up with the orders of service comes from Daryl Trulesen, I believe is his name. His book, yes, Daryl Trulesen. His book going through the book of Acts—it’s a workbook for children.
And so I included a couple of things here. At the top of the one side of the page, there’s an outline of the book of Acts that he has developed. And then at the bottom of that is a crossword sort of a thing. And then in the back, there’s some questions and answers for kids to fill in the blanks of. And I thought, well, we’re going to start this book of Acts now. And those of you with children who can read and write and stuff that may give you a good opportunity to use this material to help them begin to work their way through the book of Acts in your times at home, etc.
So this outline really falls naturally from the central verse that we want to talk a little bit about verse 8. But let’s put it in context first by looking at these first few verses. The book of Acts was written around AD 63 and is essentially a continuation of the gospel of Luke. It’s my belief the belief of most orthodox believers that Luke wrote this book although he’s not specifically identified as the writer.
And in the first verse we see a correlation back to the former treatise. Remember I made mention of this two weeks ago—very first verse. “The former treatise have I made O Theophilus of all that Jesus began both to do and teach.” And we talked there about the importance of doing and teaching. Understanding the word of God intellectually and then also receiving instruction but also doing the things. We’ve talked about orthodoxy and orthopraxy—correct understanding of doctrine and correct application of it into our lives.
Very important for us to remember that within a culture that tends to look a lot at intellectualism in terms of the Christian culture at least in some aspects of it and forget the necessity to apply it. But in any event, he’s talking here about the former treatise and I believe this refers back to the gospel of Luke that he had written. And this treatise is identified as what Jesus began to do and teach. That is the gospel of Luke. And then he says “until the day in which he was taken up, after that he through the Holy Ghost had given commandments unto the apostles.”
If you look at your gospel of Luke, the last few verses of the Gospel of Luke, you’ll see what’s going on here is he’s picking up essentially where the Gospel of Luke leaves off. The last chapter of Luke, chapter 24, concludes with Jesus coming and appearing to the apostles. This is shortly after the appearance to the disciples on the road to Emmaus and eating food with them and giving them an understanding of who he was, expounding the Old Testament. And that has importance too.
In fact, let’s just go back to verse 21. Well, this will be just kind of stick this away. As long as you’re in the Gospel of Luke, chapter 24, verse 21. This happens on the road to Emmaus. You’ve heard this story probably many times. The disciples didn’t understand this was the Lord they were walking with. They didn’t recognize him. This is the risen Savior. But they’re downcast. They say, “We trusted that it had been he which should have redeemed Israel.” They’re talking to this stranger, not knowing it is the Savior himself. And besides all this, today is the third day since these things were done.
So they’re saying, Jesus, well, we’re kind of down because we followed this Messiah fella and it’s the third day and we thought he was going to redeem Israel and you know, lo and behold, he hasn’t done it. And then he goes on to tell them it was necessary. He opens their eyes and says it was necessary, of course, to die and to suffer the passion. All of which the Old Testament foretold. Then in the next few verses, he appears to the disciples.
And let’s begin reading in verse 45. “And then opened he their understanding that they might understand the scriptures, and said unto them, Thus it is written, and thus it behooved Christ to suffer and to rise from the dead the third day, and that repentance and remission of sins should be preached in his name among all nations, beginning at Jerusalem, and ye are my witnesses of these things. And behold, I send the promise of my father upon you. But tarry ye in the city of Jerusalem until you have been endued with power from on high.”
And he led them out as far to Bethany, and he lifted up his hands and blessed them. And it came to pass while he blessed them, he was parted from them and carried up into heaven. And they worshiped him and returned to Jerusalem with great joy and were continually in the temple praising and blessing God.
Amen.
So the final conclusion of the gospel of Luke, he portrays the departure of the savior, the ascension at Bethany. And that is over by Mount Olivet or Mount of Olives is another description of that place. It’s a hillside somewhere around 15 furlongs or so, thousand feet let’s see—it’d be let’s see probably somewhere around a quarter to half a mile I suppose from Jerusalem itself and that’s where the Savior ascends from and Luke then in the opening chapter of Acts gives us more detail on the commands that he had given to the apostles just before his leaving. He gives us a little more detail. So he picks up there but he fleshes out the account somewhat.
Okay, so he says and then he puts it in context and this is very important also for our purposes today. Verse three, Jesus had been seen by them 40 days and he spoke of the things pertaining to the kingdom of God. And so for 40 days Jesus had been resurrected but not ascended to the father. And in those 40 days he had appeared to the disciples and instructed them. And he had specifically instructed them on what? Things pertaining to the kingdom of God.
So he was opening their understanding to what the kingdom was as we see him doing in the road to Emmaus with the two disciples. As we see him doing to the disciples in the room when he first appears to them. He begins to open their understanding of how the kingdom proceeds and how it is necessary for him to die, to suffer, and be resurrected. And it’s necessary that repentance and remission of sins be preached. That’s all in relationship to this great theme that he spoke on for 40 days, which is the kingdom of God. And that’s verse three.
Okay. Then having assembled together with them, he commanded them that they should not depart from Jerusalem, but wait for the promise of the father. That’s just a repeat of what we just read in the Gospel of Luke. So he’s instructed them for 40 days. He gathers together with them and the last things he tells them is don’t leave Jerusalem until you receive the promise of the father. And then goes on to say, “John baptized with water. You should be baptized with the Holy Ghost not many days hence.”
He gives them a time reference. It’s not going to be too far from now in Jerusalem after my ascension. You’re going to receive the power of the Holy Spirit, baptized with his power, filled with his strength for service.
Verse six, “When they therefore were come together, they asked of him, saying, ‘Lord, wilt thou at this time restore again the kingdom to Israel.’” Okay, so now we’ve gotten the setting. This is essentially the last words. Remember we talked about the last words of Joshua. We have here really the last words of our Savior. And it’s very important to understand them in that way as a bequest and a fuller understanding of what will happen and handing on to them the commission to do things and then also guaranteeing them the power of the commission to accomplish it.
And they ask him, Then being gathered together, they asked him of one mind. Not one of them asked this, kind of off from the others, but as a group that, it says they were together, and together they asked of him, “Lord, wilt thou at this time restore again the kingdom to Israel.”
And he answers them, and he says, “It’s not for you to know the times or the seasons which the Father hath put in his own power, but ye shall receive power after the Holy Ghost has come, and you shall be witnesses about unto me, both in Jerusalem, Judea, and in Samaria.
Now, it’s not my primary purpose to speak to the difficulties posed by verse 6, but I think it is important. The primary thing we want to focus on is what the Savior caused the apostles to focus on, the disciples in verse 8, and that is that they’re to be witnesses to the ends of the earth. But I think there is a correlation between verse 6 and 8. He is after all answering a question by them. And most of the commentators in the last few hundred years have taken one of two positions relative to the apostles asking this question about the restoration of the kingdom to Israel.
One position is the dispensational position and that is that they’re saying well when will this dispensation be over, the age of the church and then the restoration of the physical kingdom, a fleshy kingdom not through the power of the spirit but through the power of might with the physical race of Israel. When will that be restored? At the end of time and so it’d be as if dispensationalist would say that’s what this is going on here—that eventually the church age concludes, the tribulation, the rapture and then a messianic kingdom is set up in Israel with our Savior reigning over the nation of Israel and they even posit the offering of sacrifices etc. That’s one interpretation.
The other interpretation we would of course reject that interpretation because the scriptures don’t speak of two separate second comings. There’s one second final consummative second coming of our Savior. But the reformers also—not all of them, but many of the reformed theologians of our day particularly—would say that the apostles here, the disciples rather, were not quite sharp enough. They didn’t quite get it down. The dispensationalists are wrong because it won’t actually happen. But they’re right in saying that what the disciples are looking toward is the establishment of a physical kingdom by force to rule over the enemies of Messiah. And they see that in relationship to the kingdom of Israel.
So both current interpretations posit a fleshy, mistaken—well, in the case of the reformed theology, a mistaken view of the kingdom, in the case of the dispensationalist, a correct view of the kingdom that will happen after the dispensation of the church is concluded.
Now, I think there’s a problem with that. If you think that the apostles somehow didn’t quite understand the nature of the kingdom, first of all, notice that they’re coming together as a group asking this. So, if they are—as one commentator said—dense disciples, they are really a group of dense disciples. But recognize what they’ve just gone through. They’ve gone through 40 days of what? Instruction from our Savior on what? The nature of the kingdom. And are they now at the end of that 40 days going to get so screwed up as to forget what the very essential nature of the kingdom is in terms of being spiritual and not a fleshy power from on high physical manipulation of force sort of kingdom?
Are they going to get it all that mixed up? No. And if they did, would our Savior then rebuke them? Well, he might have, but he doesn’t really rebuke them here, does he? He doesn’t tell them that the kingdom will not be restored to Israel. What he tells them is it’s not for you to know the times or the seasons. Those two phrases mean the long periods of time and the short point action sort of events, eras and epochs is the way one commentator put it. Those things the father has given unto his authority. It’s not within our realm of authority. It could be, but God has decided not to. God the Father, he maintains that knowledge for himself.
So Jesus isn’t telling him that there will not be the resumption of the kingdom to Israel. What he does tell them is he then goes on to say, “You shall receive power after you have received the Holy Ghost. You’ll be witnesses unto me both in Jerusalem, Judea, Samaria, and all the world.”
I say Judea, Samaria because in verse 8, the definite article there is only one. So those two are kind of like one thing to in the way our Savior is speaking. There’s Jerusalem, the city, Judea, the area in which Jerusalem is founded, Samaria, which is to the north, which is almost like half gentile, half Jewish, and then the uttermost parts of the earth, the Gentile nations. And our Savior says, Jerusalem, the city, Judea, Samaria, taking that as one big area, and then the whole world as well. And you’re going to be witnesses there.
I guess maybe I’m getting a little too technical here, but the point is this. I think what our Savior is doing is saying, yes, the kingdom will be restored to Israel, and this is the manner by which it shall be restored. And you don’t know the times or seasons, but you’re right, it will be restored. And this is the manner by which it shall be restored. And the manner is the preaching of the gospel of Jesus Christ.
Now, the big question is who is Israel in verse 6? And I don’t know the answer to that question. There are many commentators from the 1800s and other more modern a smaller group of more modern reformed theologians who believe that the preaching the gospel will be effectual to the conversion of the Gentiles. And following that, we’ll see the conversion of the Jews as a nation. A la, Romans 11. And that seems to make some sense in terms of interpreting this verse because after all, you remember that our Savior told of the parable of the vineyard and how the owner of the vineyard sends his servants back to the vineyard and the people beat up the servants and he finally sends his son and they kill the son and then he takes the vineyard away from those people and gives it to another people.
There’s this obvious statement through the parables and also through the teachings of our Savior in the New Testament and also the Old Testament prophecies that the kingdom will be radically changed now. It will no longer be confined to a group of people in Israel. It’ll be essentially taken away from them. They’ll be broken off. The Gentiles will be grafted into the people of God. And then eventually all the Israelites, all the Jews will be saved, being grafted back in those that believe—that is, that are true Israelites or true Jews.
So one method of interpreting this I think correctly and could fit the text would fit the understanding of the kingdom disciples probably had and yet would ignore the dispensationalist errors of the mystery of the church etc. One correct way to interpret this is our Savior is telling them the kingdom will be restored to Israel as a distinct people who believe in the Old Testament—those people only after the gospel is preached to all the Gentiles and then finally the conversion of the Jewish nation will happen and they’ll be grafted into the church and all, every, the world will then be totally essentially converted.
That’s one way of interpreting this that’s correct. Another possible way, however, is to say that Israel is simply those, as it means in its most literal understanding, those who rule for God. The church is Israel now, as many scriptures in the New Testament tell us. And what they could be talking about here is that here we’re hanging around for 40 days. There’s no manifestation of the kingdom of Israel. It seems like the church is not in control. The church is persecuted. The church is not it’s just it’s just it’s cast about and no centrality, no power to it. And Jesus could be saying that the restoration of the kingdom to Israel is the restoration of the rule of the world to the church.
And that I believe is what Acts is all about—is the restoration, the giving over of the ruling of the entire world to those who believe in Jesus Christ.
Now I could be wrong there and it could be the other interpretation. As David Brown for instance in his work of a century or two ago and other postmillennial or optimistic eschatological people believe that it’s the restoration of the Jews after the Gentiles are converted. I could be wrong. Either one of those answers though suffices to essentially giving us the same model for how the kingdom is manifested in Israel. Either it’s a separate people after the Gentiles are converted or whether Israel is speaking here of the church directly. Either way, our Savior tells us a couple of things.
He tells us that we will—the preaching of the gospel to all nations—will be effectual. It’s not a vain effort. After all, they are being given power from on high. They’re being baptized with the Holy Ghost. That’s what they’re waiting for. The Holy Ghost doesn’t come upon men and empower them for works that are vain. No, the preaching of the gospel will be effectual.
And so, Psalms like Psalm 66 that you recited responsively a few minutes ago that talked about all nations will worship the Lord. Micah chapter 3, Isaiah, the predictions that all nations will stream up to the mountain of the Lord. These things are repeated in abundance throughout the scriptures and they’re all right. They’re all correct. The kingdom will grow and cover the whole world.
And our Savior is telling us number one that your task will be effectual because you’ll be receiving power from on high, the gift, the promise of the Father, reception of the Holy Spirit, so that you then are empowered for the task. That task is the preaching and proclaiming of the gospel of Jesus Christ in Jerusalem, Judea, Samaria, and all the world. Our Savior is here commissioning them—if you want to look at it that way—giving them a mandate from his word to evangelize and disciple the entire world and so world missions is at the heart of the book of Acts.
Now you know world missions is not simply at the heart of the book of Acts, however world missions runs throughout the scriptures. As I was thinking about Acts and I’ve talked before about the correlations we will be making over time to the book of Joshua let’s just think in big terms. You get down to the minutiae a lot. Let’s think in big terms.
Last week, I went up to Seattle to preach up there. I took my two boys with me. As we began to drive up north on the freeway. I thought, well, let’s make use of this time. You know, on the way, you’re supposed to teach your children in the way according to Deuteronomy 6. Here, I’ve got a way, a long way. And I thought, let’s just talk about the book of Genesis. We’ve talked about that a lot in our family. And we just reviewed the entire book of Genesis, the major stories. Want to make sure the kids know them, know the chronology. And, you know, it’s good for us to remember that Genesis is the origin. It’s the starting place of the scriptures and the scriptures have a thematic approach to them.
You have Genesis, you got the first Pentateuch and then Joshua and then the rest of the Old Testament and you have the gospels, the four accounts of Jesus followed by Acts. So right away there’s a correlation there. Genesis begins with creation—begins with a world created by God to rest in the seventh day and go into his worship and rest. And then problems happen in the book of Genesis. Sin rears its ugly head. And but it doesn’t stay there.
How does Genesis end? Genesis ends with Joseph, the beloved of the father, having gone through difficult times, imprisonment, a picture of death, yet being restored to power, becoming Pharaoh’s right-hand man, and essentially, I think the language of the Old Testament of Genesis, those last few chapters, shows us the conversion of Egypt, the ruling power of the world at that time, and Joseph feeding all the peoples of the world.
Why do his brothers come back to him? They come back to get food. And those who have spurned Jesus, whether it’s us or the nation of Israel, typified by the tribes that of the rest of Jacob’s sons that put Joseph in slavery and he essentially symbolically killed him. They return to Joseph because he’s the only place where they can get food. Remember, he interprets Pharaoh’s dream. So he disperses what? Grain, bread, communion bread, manna from heaven, so to speak, to his brothers, into all the world. That’s the great famine in all the world, the scriptures tell us.
And so Genesis moves from creation, decreaion if you wish, curse, sin, results of the curse, death and diminishment away and problems, and then a recreation at the end where the whole world is converted and Joseph sits at the top of the power structures of the world dispensing divine bread.
And of course beyond that, of course, we’re just, I see, I believe—and there’s controversial I suppose—but the conversion of Egypt Genesis gives us the model for all of history. That’s what all history speaks to. What do we see in Joshua then? The beginning of the next portion after the Pentateuch, after the instructions that God gives his redeemed people. We see Joshua the same thing. We see them coming out of a wilderness situation. We see that ritual stuff going on at first. Remember the Passover and the circumcision that occurs—the next creation model again.
We have a new people going through the rivers of the Jordan. And then we have some victory at Jericho. And then sin again at Ai and problems. But by the end of Joshua, what does God tell us at the end? The theological conclusion in remember in chapter 21, no failing words, as one commentator put it. All things that God promised hundreds of years before came to pass. And the model we have there is that all of Canaan is redeemed and restored and evangelized or destroyed. They’re either removed like most of them or they’re evangelized—Rahab and the Gibeonites.
And so we have essentially the conversion, the restoration of Israel to the place of ruling for God again in the portion of the world that’s a model for all of the world in the book of Joshua. So we have the same model—new creation, sin and its effects, restoration of the people back and then victory from God in terms of no failing words and God’s word impacts culture and history to the end that his people are established.
What do we see in the gospels? We see the birth of Jesus Christ, God incarnate, new creation so to speak again—second chance so to speak—second Adam the scriptures tell us. And what do we see the effects of sin? Our Savior goes through that death destruction and cursing for us through his work on the cross. And so we see sin but is that the end of the story? No, the gospels end on the upnote—the end of the risen Savior telling his disciples go into all the world preaching the gospel the whole world will be converted just as it was in Genesis just as the model of it was in the book of Canaan. So the gospels you see the same birth of Jesus, the incarnation, new creation, destruction.
Jesus takes upon himself now the judgments of God. In Genesis, the judgment came through the flood essentially. And then the judgment came through a pagan nation. In the book of Joshua, the judgment came by the sword. And the judgment comes essentially to establish God’s people. There was a flood that in Genesis and then there was a later flood where Pharaoh and his men were consumed actually in Exodus then consumed and God’s enemies are destroyed.
In the book of Joshua, the judgment came by way of the sword. And in the gospels, the judgment comes by Jesus Christ himself taking the curse of the people upon himself and redeeming us. And then it ends with the promise of the conversion of the whole world. And so now we have the book of Acts correlated to the book of Joshua. The acts of the apostles are meant to be seen as the acts of Jesus Christ. Verse one says “began to say what Jesus did and taught. And now we’re going to see what the apostles and the rest of the book of Acts do and teach. The church is identified with the Lord Jesus Christ and the apostles are his witnesses.
His witnesses in a very special sense that we aren’t first in the first application of the word. They go forth of those who have seen Jesus literally lived among them and then go out to do his deeds and to teach his doctrine. And what’s what are we going to see in the book of Acts? We’re going to see persecution. We’re going to see problems for the church. We’re going to see imprisonment as we did with Joseph. But how does Acts end? Acts ends with Paul in Rome at the center of the world power again as Joseph ended up in Egypt ruling so to speak.
So Paul now ends up in Rome and the implication is supposed to be we’re supposed to see that Paul is evangelizing members of the Roman household itself. We know that’s true from his epistles. And so essentially the leaven of the kingdom is seen to work its way through infecting at the very heart of the known world the Roman Empire, the great anti-Christian empire. It’s itself now has been affected with the leaven of the kingdom at the end of the book of Acts and we’re supposed to understand then that history will mean that leaven will work its way out and what do we see within a couple of centuries? The conversion of essentially the entire Roman Empire with Constantine.
So the biblical flow of history is all summed up for us as is the book of Acts in verse 8 where Jesus says you’re going to get power from on high it’ll be effectual the purpose of that power is to convert the whole world to engage in world missions to engage in world evangelization.
You know, evangelization can be seen as separate from discipleship. And when people today use the word evangelization, they usually mean just bringing people into the kingdom, preparing them for heaven, and then not really worrying too much about what they do on earth. We know that the commission of our Savior is much broader. We’re to disciple the nations. Disciplization actually is part of evangelization.
The good news is that Christ has ascended and reigns from the right hand of the Father and it’s supposed to have impact in all of our lives. And Jesus says that’s the work we’re to be going through now. And the judgment is comes now not by means of floods, not by means of swords, which were pictures of the efficacy of the word of God, but now it is the preaching of the gospel of Christ, specifically the proclamation of who King Jesus is in its application all of life.
This is what’s effectual now for the conversion not just of Jerusalem, not of the area in which Jerusalem, the model, the home church, mother church was Judea and Samaria. No, this preaching will be effectual—conversion of the entire world. And that’s why the dispensationalists are so wrong to cut short the gospel of Christ and think that somehow we need a physical military return of Messiah to put down his enemies.
No. Jesus says the power of the gospel is the power he uses to conquer the earth. And he shows us that repeatedly in the book of Genesis, the models beginning there, the book of Joshua where all that is worked out and made applicable now to the land of Canaan. The gospels themselves declare this when Jesus raises victorious over his enemies and commissions his people at the end of every gospel to go into the world and receive power and evangelize and convert the world and disciple it.
And we see it in the book of Acts. We’ll see the same model go through new creation of the church, problems, destruction, sin. People are going to be swallowed up by the earth again. Ananias and Sapphira just like Achan was. And the end result of all that will be the establishment of God’s people with the conversion of the Roman household itself, the power center of all the world. And of course, that’s the We could go on to say it’s the same model, the book of Revelation. That’s what happens to the book of Revelation as well.
John ascends up. He’s taken up into heaven. New birth, so to speak. He’s ascended now. And from a heavenly perspective, he sees that all history moves to the establishment of God’s people. Judgments, yes, sin, yes, destruction, decreaion, so to speak, but always to the end. That a purified church should be raised up victorious, not in the heavens by and by, certainly there also, but now on earth as well. And history is that kind of movement.
The book of Acts tells us that’s what’s going to happen. Jesus speaks these things. These are his last words to us. It is a commission from our Lord Jesus, a mandate from his word that we go into all the world preaching the gospel. And he promises us that the power of the Holy Spirit will make this task effectual to us.
It’s interesting that as he ascends then you know it says a cloud received them up. Actually the language there means the cloud carried him up. And you that should remind us that God always comes in his glory cloud in the Old Testament. And now Jesus is riding that glory cloud. The picture of the reigning Master from heaven who comes in the clouds of power. And Jesus will come again in that cloud finally a final time at the consummation of all things. And the disciples are gazing up at this. And who wouldn’t?
It doesn’t happen behind their back where they’re not looking. It happens while they’re watching our Savior. He rises up and ascends to heaven and a cloud comes and lifts him up until they taken completely out of sight and they gaze at that. And that’s what we can do and we understand the realities of all these things the majesty of what God has done with his creation with the sending of his son with the power of the gospel it is awe inspiring to me and I hope it is to you to picture these great movements of the book of Genesis for instance ending with Joseph and the tremendous majesty he exhibits over the whole world the type of the Lord Jesus Christ the greater Joseph the greater Joshua who we’re talking about now in the book of Acts and it is a majestic thing and we come to worship him today and it is easy simply to stand and sit in awe of what has been accomplished and what our Savior tells us that the entire world will be converted.
Remember these are not a great many people that he’s speaking to. This is not some massive audience. He’s talking to a handful of disciples. They didn’t know much about the world. They didn’t have television, radio, international transmissions. The world was a distant place for them. And their Savior had given them an all inspiring words that the very preaching the speaking of those words of the reality of the Lord Jesus Christ calling men to repentance demonstrating the remission of sins and forgiveness and then discipling them with his words that in itself—forget gunpowder and everything else—that’s the dynamite of God and that dynamite will go into all the world. That’s an amazing thing and the entire do you believe it? It’s hard to believe it isn’t it?
And when you do believe it when God gives you power to believe it is awe inspiring. You just want to sit and think about it and wonder with amazement at what Christ has accomplished. And that’s in a sense what they were doing. And in a sense, they do they have happened to them what’s supposed to happen to us at the end of our worship day together. At the end of our worship day, we’re we’re caught up with God in the heavenlies. That’s what worship is all about.
I know we’re an immature church in terms of worship. Over the years though, worship will be more and more evidencing what is going on here. We’re caught up into the heavenlies with God as John was. And we see the reality. What history is all about. And we worship our Savior on this day. And all that worship focuses in on communion. And it’s as if we are gazing at our Savior at the end of communion, thinking of the tremendous things he has done for us and our forgiveness of sins. And then thinking about the implications of that for the entire world.
That’s pictured for us. And then God’s got to come and tell us at the end, okay, now depart in peace. Get out of here now. Go back down from the mountain. There are demon-possessed people out there. You’ve got to go do this work now. You got to do what Jesus is. are you going to do to preach the gospel?
And that’s what happens to these disciples here. They’re up they’re standing gazing up into the heavens struck at what has happened. Verse 10, they look steadfastly toward heaven as he went up. Behold, two men stood by them in white apparel which also said, “You men of Galilee, why stand you gazing up into heaven? The same Jesus which is taken up for you into heaven shall so come in like manner as you have seen him go into heaven.”
Who are these two guys? Well, there’s kind of speculation and it’s just speculation. Could be those two angels we looked at the book of Matthew not too long ago during our communion talks about the earthquake and the angel came. Could be those sort of angels in white raiment. Other commentators have talked about speculation and I got this from J. Alexander, tremendous reformed commentator. He said that a friend of his told him maybe this was Elijah and Moses, the two men who were on the mount of transfiguration. And you remember they had to tell the apostles then well Jesus told them to go back down. You’re right. Your point is not to build tabernacles here and stay forever on the mountain top.
Your job is to be empowered, understand what’s going to happen in history, and go down and do it. So, it could be Elijah and Moses here. After all, that mount of transfiguration, they were discussing with our Savior, his coming exodus from Jerusalem. And again, that brings us back to the Old Testament, the Exodus of God’s people out of Egypt, moving toward the promised land behind the great Joshua and Moses. And so, Jesus has identified this to Elijah and Moses at the mount of transfiguration in the gospel accounts as his exodus from Jerusalem and that’s what the disciples are watching.
They’re watching the exodus of Jesus Christ. He goes into the heavenlies and he empowers his people for the exodus to move out from Jerusalem and the whole world now becomes the garden of God and they are commanded by our Savior’s words and then by his emissaries to obey him. Yes, it is a marvelous thing, but don’t let the marvel of it stop you from doing what you’re supposed to do and relax and just enjoy it. No, you must work hard to accomplish what our Savior has called us to do.
And so they return then unto Jerusalem from the mount. They walk in obedience and that’s what we’re called to do. The book of Acts gives us the great flow of history one more time from the scriptures. And it tells us specifically that we live in the days and times in which we’re supposed to go into all the world preaching the gospel of our Savior. And it calls us to worship him. Yes, for that this day particularly. But it also calls us then to obey him with simple acts.
All they had to do was go back to Jerusalem and wait for the promise that had been promised by the Father, the Holy Ghost to empower them for ministry. And that’s what we’ll see the rest of the book of Acts. They receive that power and they work it out.
So we have a mandate from the word. Well, we also have a mandate not just for those apostles. We have a mandate for this church, for every individual member of this church and for also this church as a group to engage in world missions. I thought a lot these last few days about that old slogan from communist Berkeley in the heyday of the 60s their slogan was to think globally and act locally. That’s good, you know, it’s not good if you’re talking about communism but it is good if you’re talking about the gospel. That’s what our Savior is telling his disciples here think globally—recognize that the impact of your words as you use the words of our Savior in response of obedience to him. Those words will impact the globe, but you’re to think globally and you’re to act locally.
And that’s what our Savior’s mandate is for us as well. I mentioned Dabney in his I won’t quote from his sermon, but it’s an excellent sermon by him in his discussions and maybe one of these weeks I will quote from it. He preaches to the foreign mission board in 1858 of the Presbyterian Church on the passage from John 4 where our Savior after talking to the woman at the well, the Samaritan woman says he looks up and he says the fields are white for harvest.
And then in other places of scriptures, he says, pray that God would send forth workers into the fields. Dabney says there’s a couple of implications from that text and it’s important for us as we consider our response to world missions. The world is white to harvest. What does that mean? Dabney says, and I think he’s right, that our Savior is warning us that there is a limited amount of time to do this work.
Yes, it is the providence of God and his calling that empowers us and we’re reaching the elect community that have already been saved eternally by God the Father, but we’re the means. We’re the means. I thought about this in terms of various activities of the church. We always would like miraculous things to happen, you know, to accomplish things in our life. I was thinking this morning that many of the prayer requests that we all hear and we speak to one another can be boiled down to simple discipline in the small things of life.
We want miraculous things, thousands of dollars to get us out of debt. Great wisdom our children want. They can zip through their studies in much quicker fashion. But what they really need is discipline to take the small acts of financial accountability, the small acts of doing their worksheets and their workbooks day by day. And that’s the way God works.
So it is important to recognize that while God is sovereign, he does use the secondary means of his people, not miracles normally, the secondary means of his church. And the church is warned by our Savior time and time again. And it’s a warning that should fall in our ears as well, that the world is white to harvest. We look around us today, as Dabney did in 1858, and we should see that there are nations unconverted, millions, billions of people who have never even heard the gospel. It is not available in their own tongue. In Dabney’s time, the number was 2/3 to 3/4 of the known world.
Now it’s less than that. There’s about 5.4 billion people in the world, but over 2 billion of those people have absolutely no access to the gospel of Jesus Christ, to a viable gospel presentation in their own language. The world is white to harvest. Those souls unreached by a proclamation of the gospel will die and they will not simply die. They will spend eternity in hell.
Dabney said in his sermon that you know it’s always fun for a preacher to give novel thoughts and get plaudits from the people for his great eloquence of speech. But it’s the simple truth as we always return to. And the simple truth I’m pointing you to this morning is that the world is white to the harvest. And as you see your neighbors around you and as you think globally and think for instance great portions of India and Asia that have never heard a gospel presentation in their own tongue recognize that these people are white to harvest in a few days, in a few months, in a few years. People will die. Nations will die.
Nations will die and go to hell. The nations that forget God and turn their back on him will go to hell. Now, in the providence of God, we cannot, you know, call God somehow unfair, unloving because of that. It is given to us by our Savior in the gospels as a prod to action and I give it to you today as a prod to action.
Dabney said also though that in the time of our Savior particularly there were great times of potential for the gospel preaching. He said there are times in history when it is it is in a sense more of an imperative than it is at other times to preach the gospel. And he mentioned how in the mid 1800s how peace had essentially gone over the world. Wars were somewhat reduced. There was a language ability the time at the same time as our Savior. There was the language of Greek that could be used to transport the gospel to lots of nations to the Roman Empire.
God had in his providence prepared pathways so to speak of communication so that the gospel preaching could happen effectually. And I think we live in those sorts of days today as well. We live in the time as we approach a new millennium, the year 2000. For whatever reason, and I think the reason is because God has created men this way, but for whatever reason you think men look towards spiritual truths at these kind of crucial points in history, And as we approach the year 2000, all kinds of spiritual activity begin to take place.
There is an interest on the part of the world in the providence of God in spiritual things. And so the gospel has a great opportunity to go out and pervade the world. English now is a tremendous benefit that God has given to us that English is known in so many countries. I mentioned India here as an example. In India, if you’re received the third or fourth or fifth grade education, you can understand English.
And so there’s no need to understand these other languages though linguistic work is going on. Technology now has given us the ability to translate the word of God into native tongues at much quicker paces. So many of these two billion people can be reached quickly. All that’s required however all of this opportunity that God gives us requires workers to go into the harvest. And that’s where the call to us individually and to the church as well reaches out to us and makes it impact upon us.
I guess all I’m trying to do this morning really is to tell you that the whole book of Acts is a brought a commission to his church to world missions and evangelization of all the world, our local areas, our state, our nation, but also the world. And we’re supposed to be thinking in terms of that according to our Savior.
Let’s think a little bit, if you will, and I hope this doesn’t bore you, but I want to just talk a little bit again about some of the aspects of the world around us. Let’s think a little bit globally here as opposed to just locally.
First of all, recognize that our world is growing tremendously in terms of population. I mentioned 5.4 billion people. In the next 25 years, more people will be born than from the time of Christ until 1960. Okay? So, in the next 25 years, demographically, if you work the numbers out, more people will be born than the number of people that were born from the time of our Savior to the time 1960.
In other words, the point is there’s a lot of people and a lot of people being born. What does that mean to us? And terms of our thinking globally, it means we should pray that God send workers into the field. The fields are white for harvest. There’s all kinds of people to harvest out there. Great numbers. And it requires not now a retraction of missionary activity, but an expansion of it that we could think in terms of sending workers out into the world to harvest that God is bringing up.
There’s a tremendous shift in terms of urbanization. More and more of the world are now living in great urban centers as opposed to rural centers. Mexico City is growing by 80,000 people a month. Mexico City, a city in Mexico. By the year 2000, they will have more people in Mexico City than in all of Canada. Think of that tremendous urbanization. In Argentina, 34% of the people in Argentina live in the capital city of Buenos Aires. And in Uruguay, over 50% of the people in Uruguay live in the capital city of Montevideo.
In 1950 there were two cities in the third world that had populations over 5 million. Now there are 34 cities in the third world with populations of 5 million or more. There are over 275 cities worldwide that have over 1 million people in population. And what does this mean?
Well, if you know much about urbanization, it means that more and more of the structures in which we live are depersonalized. I talked about that a couple of weeks ago, how there’s a tremendous movement toward depersonalization. Next week, I’m going to preach on family camp. And one of the things I’m going to talk about is the quiet passing of natural community. There is no natural community like there was in agrarian cultures. And so, you have to recognize that you got to make more of an effort to build community around the gospel of Christ.
Now, I think in the providence of God, that’s a good thing. I think that natural community is not ultimately what God wants. He wants Christian community. So, I don’t bemoan it. But it is a fact that we must recognize that what we’re saying here in terms of world missions is that people that are going to be reached with the gospel of Christ are depersonalized and that gives us even more of an opportunity for the presentation of the gospel.
Remember two weeks ago I said that if we treat people as people just by that very nature you will have an impact on the world around you because they’re not used to it and they’re made in the image of God although they’re darkened images in rebellion against him.
Show Full Transcript (48,898 characters)
Collapse Transcript
COMMUNION HOMILY
No communion homily recorded.
Q&A SESSION
# Q&A Session Transcript
## Reformation Covenant Church | Pastor Dennis Tuuri
—
**Q1:** Rory G.:
What is it about a more biblical approach to missionary evangelism? Most of what I know about in terms of missions has a great number of Arminian elements with a lot of devices that I would consider fleshly or worldly, such as you mentioned—the surveys and this mechanical approach to spreading and furthering the gospel. My concern is: can you point me or any of us to anything to read to give us a reformed or more biblical approach? I’m a little wary of the word “reformed,” although it does seem to lend itself more to a biblical approach. I don’t want to be limited to just a reformed perspective.
**Pastor Tuuri:**
Well, you know, a couple of things there. First of all, no, I can’t really point to anything I know of that’s very synopsized that way. I mentioned Dabney’s article in his discussions, and I found it an interesting piece. It’s not an article really—it’s a copy of a sermon that he gave. And of course, Dabney was someone most of us would agree with on a lot of what he believed.
There is a small book that some of us used to read through called *Reformed Evangelism*. Remember that one? I think I might have a couple of copies of that around.
It’s interesting though. I didn’t spend a lot of time doing this, so I don’t mean to characterize as if I did, but I spent a little bit of time going through various indexes of the confessions and catechisms of the reformers for mission material, and it just wasn’t there. Then I looked in several of the books of the Reconstructionists in the index to see if they had anything on missions or world missions, and there was nothing there.
Another comment: one of the things you can get in terms of missions from the earlier reformers in the 1600s and 1700s—you’ll see a lot about missions to the Jews specifically. And of course, I think there’s some of that in some of the response materials written in response to the charges of anti-Semitism against Reconstructionism. There’s a small booklet by Gary DeMar, for instance. The Scottish Presbyterian Church has had a mission to the Jews ever since its existence. They see the Jews as an excommunicated people, essentially, with the hope that God would eventually convert them. But I’ve not seen a lot on world missions from a distinctively Reformed perspective.
I think the important thing is just to keep it simple—to the Word, to the Scriptures—and then, as you say, to avoid those Madison Avenue techniques of what brings success and the “God has a wonderful plan for your life” sort of stuff.
I understand the problems here. The PCA, which is the largest of the Orthodox Presbyterian denominations—it’s much bigger than the OPC—essentially uses Campus Crusade style materials or may use Campus Crusade directly for much of their evangelism and missions work. Their mission to North America, for instance, which establishes churches in North America, uses Madison Avenue techniques in 95% of those churches. In other words, they do direct mail pieces based upon a certain percentage of people responding, low commitment required, low amount of Scripture involved—common ground sort of stuff. So it’s really bad.
I think if we’re going to find anything distinctively reformed, we have to go back probably at least a century or two. That’s what I did—going back to Dabney and just seeing what his approach was on it. It’s interesting: he certainly does not take the position that Calvinism somehow obviates our responsibility to preach the gospel. He talks about the world being white unto harvest. People are perishing. We’ve got to get out there. He said the basic reason to evangelize people is not so that we can have a better culture. It’s to rescue people from going to hell. And we’ve got to remember that, he said.
So this man is strongly Reformed. Those are just some thoughts. I would be grateful if anybody else has any materials they’ve read from a more Reformed or Reconstructionist or Transformationalist perspective—I’d be real interested.
I think we will be hearing more on that. I thought, for instance, one of the—let’s see—the four ways that World Thrust teaches you to personalize world missions for your congregation. This seminar I went to. One is through prayer, which we’re all doing a lot of. Second is through faith promise giving, which we’ve never done. Third is through short-term missions work, which has some problems associated with it we’ll talk about later. And the fourth area is a world missions conference.
I thought rather than have one of their world missions conferences, which are going to be Arminian probably and primarily focused on Arminianism, we can take existing things we do and try to build in a thrust of world missions from time to time. For instance, Reformation Party—we talk about different countries. We talk about Calvin. You know, they had a great missionary activity at the seminary in Geneva; they would send out Calvinistic missionaries to all of Europe. It’d be good to uncover some of that material from way back in terms of what they did in terms of missions to Europe, for instance.
Or a family camp—maybe one of these years we’d want to have, you know, James B. Jordan or somebody, Bahnsen, to talk about world missions and their particular slant or perspective on it. But as of right now, I don’t have a lot of information or a lot of stuff I can recommend to read.
—
**Q2:** Questioner:
Yeah, one of my biggest concerns is in working and expending effort and money or whatever—the last thing I want to do is get caught up in the evangelical dispensational mindset where I’m sending overseas people that are telling other people that all that matters is your soul, right? You know, the rapture syndrome and that type of thing. That’s a great concern to me, which is one of the reasons why Gothard and what he does is fairly attractive, especially in the Soviet Union. What’s going on there now?
**Pastor Tuuri:**
Well, to me that was another reason why I thought the adopted people program was somewhat attractive. What you try to do is, I think—we can take an adversarial approach to Arminian or Baptist missionary organizations, or we can take a complementary approach. And I think the complementary approach may not be a bad model. In other words, if we’re particularly involved in a people group and our church is the one that’s adopted it, okay, and we work in concert with mission organizations, but mostly we try to develop lines of communication from the local church to that group in India or wherever it’s at—to see where they’re at, what they need.
And one of the great things, as I mentioned in my prayer earlier, is literature. I mean, you know, they’re not going to get it from most of these mission organizations. And maybe they’re brought into the faith through a “saving brands out of the fire” mentality, but you know, the year 2000 will pass and the year 2010 will come along. Whatever seeds we can plant in a culture and a people group through materials that are geared more toward a biblical worldview—then we will have essentially accomplished the same thing that God’s accomplished in our lives.
Most of us were brought to the faith through our Arminian or Baptist theologies, and yet God has called us. We’re part of the elect, and we respond to the voice of our Savior. It comes through the application of the Word in all of our lives. So I think that’s the kind of thing I’m thinking of—not getting swept up in their sort of thing, but on the other hand, not completely ignoring them either and trying to do something totally separate and trying to rebuild a wheel, if you know what I mean, with very limited resources.
I think our particular niche will be discipleship sort of materials—intellectual preparation of pastors. There’s a great need. God’s prepared us for the harvest and prepared the harvest for us. For instance, in the adopted people program in India, there’s a great need for educational materials for pastors. And the big question, of course, that we’ll have to face is how we get it by the censors, and that’s what we rely upon God for.
**Questioner:**
I guess that’s helpful. Thanks.
—
**Q3:** Questioner:
I’d like to offer a couple things on that. I’ve read or heard a couple things in the past, oh maybe three years, that pertain to this. The most recent one is in Greg Harris’s home and family business workshop tape and notebook set, which just went back in the library by the way if anybody’s interested. He has just a short piece in one of the lectures there on the contrast between our traditional Western style—you know, couple goes over to some country, sends their kids off to boarding school, and tries to clone off an itinerant sort of Christian who goes around teaching other Christians to become Christians and send their kids off and go around—as opposed to really demonstrating to that culture what the goal is in terms of “this is what Christian families in this culture should look like.”
You know, “here we are. We have to make a living too. This is how we raise our kids. We keep them with us. This is how we get our family involved.” And of course, Greg Harris is kind of like a missionary to this culture along those lines. But those ideas meshed in with a more extended section that we read in the book called *All the Way Home* by Mary Pride, her second book. And there may be things in there that are controversial, theological, questionable, whatever. But it seems like the teaching that we’ve been getting in the last five to ten years really meshes with some of her applications.
And she mentions a book called *Missionary Methods, St. Paul’s or Ours*. There’s a couple of items in kind of a bibliography in the back of that book that I think would help us answer some of these questions about what a Christian Reconstruction or Reformed sort of approach to missions would look like.
But one of the things that really impacted me about her review of this was the situation in China. You know, where we went in, and over the course of years, the mission—like the China Inland Mission, which was real big—I mean, it required and really encouraged missionary couples that applied to go over there to not have children. But if they had to have children, then you know, don’t have more than two, and after they’re about two years old, you have to ship them off to boarding school. You can’t work with our mission. And then we’re surprised a generation later when it’s mandatory abortions over there, you know, and they’re anti-family. I mean, they’re doing what the church told them to do. And that just really hit me.
**Pastor Tuuri:**
That’s very good.
**Questioner:**
If you could maybe give me a copy of that resource list from the Mary Pride book, that’d be real helpful.
**Pastor Tuuri:**
Okay.
**Questioner:**
I think too, the whole idea of non-resident missionaries strikes me as—I don’t know much about the concept, but it strikes me as real interesting. We live in a day and age when transportation back and forth anywhere in the world is really fairly readily available. And it would not be difficult to have a particular pastor or family or whatever in contact with us, send one of us over there for periods of time. But the idea of not necessarily transporting people there for long periods of time, but rather establishing lines of communication with people that have become converted—
The other benefit of that is (and now this is kind of a two-edged sword again): modern mission movements want to get away from Western missionaries because they’re talking about how we import our culture to them, and usually it is a Christian culture—it’s not a Western culture. So that’s why they want to move toward non-resident missionaries. Some of them. Well, I don’t want to fall into that trap. On the other hand, there is a very real sense in which the gospel, the Scriptures, do become inculturated to us. It would be helpful for our church to see, for instance, a church grow up—a small church of ten, fifteen families eventually—in one of these people groups. And their application of the Scriptures, if they do it self-consciously and diligently, may well end up challenging us in some of the things we do that may have more of our culture in it than of the Word of God. So there’s lots of reasons to go toward that kind of a model.
**Questioner:**
You’re absolutely right. The Chariots of Fire—you know, the other side of that coin is that fellow. That’s what he did, if I’m not mistaken. He became a missionary, left his family and his wife and his kids. That’s the ideal.
**Pastor Tuuri:**
Yeah, that’s was the ideal thing. And it’s just terrible. Just terrible.
**Questioner:**
There’s two other things that your talk this morning brought to mind. And one of them was when the Gothard’s efforts—the Institute and Basic Life Principles—are going to Moscow, one of the first dreams they had was: since a mother over there, working outside the home, earned a total of like twelve bucks a month, they were thinking, “Hey, a family here could sponsor that family over there. Just pay her the twelve bucks and say, ‘You stay home and teach your kids at home. You know, teach them Scripture. You know, raise them at home—homeschool, whatever.’”
But they eventually, you know, kind of moved on to greater opportunities in terms of taking over all the orphanages and schools in Moscow or whatever they’re doing.
But in these “adopt a culture” kind of things that you’re mentioning, there’s an economic disparity between this culture and that, so that to take one family in this culture to, I don’t know—not sponsored, but to somehow come alongside. If there’s a means of communication, a language, you know—no language barrier or communications barrier—maybe one family in this culture can make a commitment to relate to one family in that culture and not support them necessarily. Although there would be legitimate occasion, if like a pastor over there or a missionary that wants to spend his days reaping a wide harvest—that’s that’s perfectly legitimate. But he is more apt to have an abnormal family life than just another family that’s trying to live out what a Christianized local culture would look like over there.
And if they need help, if they need literature, if they need advice, if they need stories or whatever, somehow have that line of communication open and recommend things and help them or help them to plant seeds.
**Pastor Tuuri:**
Yeah, that sounds great to me. That sounds real good. And even the financial assistance—what we have in the culture in which we live is a lot of Bibles available, a lot of now good literature available, a lot of money compared to other portions of the globe. So the idea is to take those resources, focus them in a priority sort of strategic way upon families, cultures, people groups that we can assist. And I think your model of trying to actually get family-to-family connections is a great one because you can see, for instance, the impact upon a converted family there in terms of just family worship. And that’s thinking you know, about their kids, their grandkids or great-grandkids. What can we build into their lives? Small steps, correspondence back and forth, family to family, related family devotions that can have an impact generationally in that part of the world instead of just “save them. Come to church on Sunday,” and the rest of their life is essentially the rest of their life.
**Questioner:**
The one other thing that I think Mary Pride might even have a chapter in that book on is the international student issue, where your home can become an oasis for an international student. And she points out that most of the international students that come here to go to school come from a culture where the family is valued a lot more than what this culture values it. And so if you have a real family, you know, they will really identify with you maybe more than the culture around them, you know, gospel aside. And that sort of thing could become the initial contact of what we’re talking about here, because usually these would be single people probably. They’ll be going back. They’ll be getting married. They’ll be starting families, and you’d have that relationship already.
**Pastor Tuuri:**
Sure. Sounds good.
—
**Q4:** Questioner (from back of room):
There’s a question back there. Is there a comment? This is a book that Noel Pedon asked me about. I told him it’s a book called *The Puritan Hope*. I don’t know if a lot of folks have read it, but for those who don’t know about it, it’s basically a book on the Calvinistic approach to revival and missions and the history of it. And I’d highly recommend it to anybody.
**Pastor Tuuri:**
Do you know if that’s in our library or not?
**Questioner:**
Apparently it’s not. No, I have a copy. I’ll put it in there.
**Questioner:**
So anyway, and there’s also an article in the *Failure of the American Baptist Culture* called “Evangelism and Social Action.” It’s basically a polemic against the Moral Majority and its view of dividing socialism or social action and evangelism, making the two kind of almost an opposition and not seeing them work together. But I think it also might have some good application for us as far as how we want to see evangelism worked out within the context of social action as well.
So it’s Kevin Craig, I think.
**Pastor Tuuri:**
Yeah, I think so.
**Questioner:**
And one more comment too. You said something about seeing—our bottom line desire is to see men saved and rescued from the flames of hell. And I thought in terms of the application of our church discipline to missions, we ultimately, in a church discipline situation, want to see God’s glory manifested either through the repentance of the one who’s sinned or through the manifestation of him being moved out and in God’s judgment.
And it seems like that’s a good model for us in missions as well—that we want to see God’s glory manifested, and ultimately the culture and the church is edified when that happens, right? Either through the removal of that person or through them being brought back in. And I don’t know. I think that probably is a good model.
**Pastor Tuuri:**
Sure. Sounds good to me. That’s good.
**Questioner:**
Yeah, it was interesting to me that Dabney took the approach he did. It’d be interesting to know his other reactions to his sermon, but it’s pretty interesting stuff. Along with what John was saying, essentially, the message of the world being won over to Christ, glorifying God, is part of the gospel message in and of itself as you’re speaking to a person for his own salvation. You can’t leave that out. I mean, if you just talk about the personal aspect, then you’re not really preaching the whole gospel.
**Pastor Tuuri:**
That’s true. I think that the point is that God’s character is such that he reveals his grace and love by bringing people into the kingdom, and that happens through the preaching of the gospel. And it also, I think secondarily, is manifested in his wrath against those that reject him. But essentially, the wonders of it all are his grace, I think.
—
**Q5:** Questioner:
Could you mention something of Gary North? You spoke on this a while back, and he was pushing for massive evangelism through the Pentecostal church after the commencement of the seventh [millennium]?
**Pastor Tuuri:**
Yeah. North has this concept that the year 2000 will move into the seventh one-thousand-year span of history. And he sees the potential perhaps of a real millennium of peace. Looking at the seven days of creation—six days, six years, six thousand years of created history coming to an end around the year 2000—and then the ushering in of a real millennial period of heightened prosperity, gospel prosperity and blessing for a thousand years. And to effect that, he’s tried to kind of hook up with some of the charismatics. I don’t know if he still believes this or not, but there for a while it was a pretty predominant element of what he was writing.
And you know, whether or not he’s correct, the point I was trying to make is that at these millennial shifts, people do take an interest in something bigger than themselves. So it does give us an opportunity, so to speak, of impacting you know, the world around us with the gospel.
**Questioner:**
That’s amazing. Some major things happened every thousand years throughout all of history. I mean, Abraham was the beginning of one of them. Christ was at the fifth.
**Pastor Tuuri:**
Yeah. Yeah. And I think, you know, it’s again—we need to look at the millennial, we need to look at time itself as sacred, so to speak, and not secular. The model for that is the Sabbath. The Sabbath works itself out in terms of the month system that God gives us—years, sabbatical years of jubilee. And I have no problem looking at centuries and then millennia with the same idea: that God in his providence causes certain things to shift.
**Questioner:**
Well, we should probably go downstairs. There’s another comment or question? We should probably go down and eat. I suppose it’s getting kind of late.
Leave a comment