AI-GENERATED SUMMARY

This sermon addresses the doctrine of assurance as part of the series on the Canons of Dort, linking it to the season of Advent. The pastor argues that assurance rests not on human decisions, works, or perseverance, but on the faithfulness of God to His word and the finished work of Christ1. He explains that the elect attain assurance in “due time” and “varying degrees” through the internal witness of the Holy Spirit and the evidence of election (fruits of the Spirit) in their lives2. The practical application warns against counseling doubting believers to simply “pray the prayer” again, urging instead that they be comforted by the objective promises of God and the evidence of His grace in their lives3.

SERMON TRANSCRIPT

Please turn in your scriptures to Romans chapter 8. Please stand for the reading of God’s word. Romans chapter 8, beginning at verse 10, read through verse 18.

Our subject today is the advent of assurance.

And if Christ be in you, the body is dead because of sin, but the spirit is life because of righteousness. But if the spirit of him that raised up Jesus from the dead dwell in you, he that raised up Christ from the dead shall also quicken your mortal bodies by his spirit that dwelleth in you.

Therefore, brethren, we are debtors, not to the flesh to live after the flesh. For if you live after the flesh, you shall die. But if he through the spirit do mortify the deeds of the body, ye shall live. For as many as are led by the spirit of God, they are the sons of God. For ye have not received the spirit of bondage again to fear, but ye have received the spirit of adoption, whereby we cry, “Aba, Father.” The spirit itself beareth witness with our spirit that we are the children of God.

And if children, then heirs, heirs of God, and joint heirs with Christ. If so be that we suffer with him, that we may be also glorified together. For I reckon that the sufferings of this present time are not worthy to be compared with the glory which shall be revealed in us.

Let’s pray. Father, we thank you for your scriptures. We thank you, Lord God, that they are revelation of yourself. They also bring us to an understanding of who we are. And we thank you, Lord God, for this particular portion of scripture with its great statements of assurance to us of our salvation in the Lord Jesus Christ. We pray, Father, that your spirit might do his work now, might open our ears to hear things of your word, might quicken this word to our understanding, that might cause our innermost part of our being to rejoice in this word and to walk in obedience to it. In Jesus name we pray and for the sake of his kingdom. Amen.

In the scriptures, advent—coming or appearance—is a phrase that is used in various ways at various times. There was an advent of the Lord Jesus Christ in his incarnation, which is the preeminent advent of the Lord Jesus Christ. There is a final advent that will occur at the end of time, at the end of this world’s history, when the Lord Jesus shall return. He sits now at the right hand of the Father until his word has gone forth and conquered all enemies through the preaching of the gospel. Then he returns to earth for his final advent.

There are various advents of the Lord Jesus Christ in scriptures as well. However, in AD 70, much of the language of the New Testament that we have sometimes thought of in terms of the final advent of our Savior really is properly understood by proper understanding of these texts to refer to the advent of the Lord Jesus Christ in judgment of Jerusalem in AD 70. And it’s not just an advent of judgment. It’s also an advent of assurance and comfort to believers as the persecuting Jewish church and what had become the persecuting Roman state is dealt with definitively by God in AD 70, which opens up a door of victory for the church.

So the next few weeks, as we consider the advent of the Lord Jesus Christ at this particular time of year in which our culture celebrates this advent, we want to talk about the advent today of assurance and comfort and preparation for battle, as it were. And next week we’ll talk about the advent of judgment. That the incarnation of the Lord Jesus Christ, which we celebrate and then look for his various appearances at our particular time of history as well, really is an advent and incarnation that brings comfort and assurance. It also brings reprobation—the doctrine we’ll be considering next week—and a progression of reprobation upon those who reject the Lord Jesus Christ.

So today we want to consider one aspect of that and that is the advent of assurance. I might of course add that most of you are fully briefed on this, but every Lord’s day is a particular advent of Jesus as well. He says in the book of Revelation that behold, he stands at the door and knocks, and if we open the door, he will come in and eat with us. And so when we have the Lord’s supper, it is an advent of a type as well.

And so there are these various comings. And you know that in your particular life, the Lord Jesus Christ works in particular ways at different times to bring forth his presence to you, which is a judging and also a refreshing and comforting presence as well.

So we want to talk today about another doctrine found in the Canons of Dort—the doctrine of the assurance of believers, of the elect, assurance of salvation. We want to talk about this reference then to the advent of the Lord Jesus Christ that he comes to effect this assurance. That’s why he came 2,000 years ago.

And let’s do a little review. One of the purposes of this is to settle your hearts on these issues and to bring you to an assurance today—for instance, of the great comfort of knowing that the Lord Jesus Christ has provided all things for your salvation. That your salvation doesn’t depend upon yourself or your decision that you made whenever it was you made your decision. Maybe you can’t remember making a decision. It doesn’t depend on your perseverance. It doesn’t depend on your good works. Your assurance depends on the faithfulness of God to his word that has called you.

And so we want to settle your hearts in that great truth. But we also want to equip you—equip ourselves here—to take this message that God has given us under stewardship to the nations, to disciple the nations. And that means one person at a time. It means taking these truths as reflected—these biblical truths as reflected through the Canons of Dort—into the living room, teaching our children, our friends, and encouraging each other in the faith of the Lord Jesus Christ and being able to speak of these things as well with our neighbors who may come from Arminian churches or no church background at all.

So taking it to the living room—by way of review then—we began this series by talking about the golden chain, which we again recited from Romans 8, verses 29 and 30, and then we sang that Geneva psalm about the great psalm of assurance that reflects those truths as Romans 8 goes on to speak about. That golden chain is a chain where all the links are connected and it starts with the foreknowledge—which means forelove—of God for the elect. He doesn’t foreknow particular things. He foreknows particular people, and those are the ones that he sets his love upon from all eternity. And that’s who you are. You have been the recipients of God’s love and affection and call placed upon you before you were even created, long before you were born.

And so that chain begins with the forelove of God and it continues. These links are together—can’t be broken apart. There’s one particular election that’s talked about, and this golden chain is a good picture of that.

Secondly, we said that this is in the context of God’s absolute sovereignty over all things. To talk about God’s sovereignty in election or in salvation is really a subset of his overall, overarching sovereignty over everything. So when I make a mistake in the liturgy as I did a couple of minutes ago, I don’t want to be slothful about that. But on the other hand, I don’t want to be frenzied in thinking that everything I do has to be perfect, because God is sovereign and he brought that to pass and he ordained that it should come to pass. Now that’s not to be an excuse for sluggardness or slothfulness, but it is to be a source of great comfort in knowing that the world is not run by us or by human effort. The world is run according to the providence of God. He has ordained whatsoever comes to pass. And in his providence, he affects his decree that he has decreed from before all time. He brings it to pass in the life of his people. And there’s a tremendous rest that we have in that.

Now we’ll see as we develop this doctrine of assurance that the two poles we want to avoid are slothfulness on one hand or a frenzied position on the other hand. And if you don’t understand the full sovereignty of God and don’t take it into the depth of your being, you can become slothful in your silliness or you can become frenzied on the other side of it. And we’ll see that the assurance of God’s salvation, the doctrine of God’s total sovereignty, is one that energizes us for work when properly understood, but it doesn’t make us frenzied in that work. It’s a work that rests on the work of the Lord Jesus Christ.

Last week we talked about unconditional election. We said that then the proper kind—the central point of the first head of doctrine of the Canons of Dort and reflected in the five points of Calvinism, the U in TULIP—unconditional election. It means that election is not conditioned upon the work of men. It’s not conditioned upon God’s foreknowledge in terms of an intellectual understanding before him that you would come to faith, that you would exercise faith. Election is not conditioned upon man’s faith. And we saw that from the scriptures. Ephesians 1 is the particular place of scripture you should be able to turn to at any time in your living room as you speak to your children or your friends or others about the doctrines of God’s grace and salvation. And Ephesians 1 posits the unconditional election of God’s people—that it was not conditioned on man’s faith.

That’s getting root and fruit confused. The root is God’s foreknowledge in his election. The fruit of that is the faith that’s exercised. But the faith that’s exercised is not the basis for the other. It’s getting things completely confused.

Unconditional election. That’s really the basic difference between the Arminian perspective. Now, I want to make sure you understand: Armenian and Arminian are two different words. Armenian refers to a person from Armenia, the country of Armenia. It’s got an ‘e’ in there. Arminian refers to the teachings of Jacob Arminius or Hermanus or whatever his name was, but his Latin name is Arminius. So when I talk about Arminianism, I’m talking about people from Arminius, not people from Armenia. RG Rushdoony is an Armenian, but he’s not an Arminian. Careful in your language.

So Arminian—the teaching of Jacobus Arminius—people that, and before that, the church has always had within the context of the Christian faith those who really denied the sovereignty of God and salvation. The essential difference is: the Arminian says that God’s choice of you, his election, is based upon something he knew you were going to do. And the scriptures say: no, you did something because he chose you. Okay, so that’s the basic difference, but that difference gets then articulated in different ways.

Arminianism attempts to deny the fact of God’s sovereign election. See, the natural man hates a discrimination produced by God. He wants a discrimination produced of his own choosing in the world. That’s okay. But when God discriminates between two people equally equal in terms of their rebellion against God and chooses one and doesn’t choose the other, that’s an offense to man. And because man doesn’t want to bow the knee to that offense, he has to construct elaborate defenses to try to say that isn’t the case.

And so Arminianism, as you get to really pushing on it—if you push a person who thinks that it’s on the basis of your choice that God’s election occurs—then he’s got to come up with all kinds of other criteria as well. He says, for instance, that it isn’t just your faith, it’s your perseverance in that faith as well. Okay? So God elects you because he knew you’re going to exercise faith, but then you also have to be able to persevere in that faith. And so the Arminian position leads to it—did in the days of the controversy we referenced here in the 1600s and it does throughout time—it leads to people not having security, having to keep persevering in the faith to maintain that election of God.

But we say the scriptures teach God’s election is unconditional. It’s not conditioned on man’s faith. Nor is it conditioned upon his perseverance nor any other work of man. That is works religion—whether it’s an exercise of faith, whether it’s praying the prayer, whether it’s being steadfast in the Lord Jesus Christ, all those things are works. And if it’s of works, then it wouldn’t be of grace. But God’s election is gracious. It is not conditioned upon any work of man.

Nor is it vague or indeterminate. God elects a particular number of people, those who are ordained to believe. The scriptures say come to believe. Okay, those particular ones—God has set a particular number of people. It’s not a vague election to some sort of general condition of faithfulness. It is a specific election of a specific group of people. It is not vague or indeterminate. It is determinate. It is a specific number of people.

There are not multiple elections. The doctrine of election is one, as this golden chain is one. So the Arminian, and again, to try to combat the truth of God’s sovereign election, tries to make many elections—to faith or to perseverance or to the conditions of faith, etc. But that’s not true. Biblical election is one doctrine.

Biblical election is not election based upon a less than just covenantal satisfaction. In other words, some people say, “Well,” and this is really particularly—we’ll see this particularly, I’ll stress this more when we come to the doctrine of the atonement—but some the Arminian position eventually says, wants to deny that Christ died just for the sins of the elect and wants to make it a general death. Then they say that really, it didn’t affect salvation for anyone. What affects salvation is this condition of faith. Okay.

The only thing that’s going to keep you in covenant faithful, the only requirement of the covenant that God makes—the Arminian says—is faith. But we say no: God’s love requires a fully just action on his part to satisfy his justice. The work of the Lord Jesus Christ is effectual for providing covenantal satisfaction because his life was totally just, total conformity to God’s word, perfect. The condition for salvation is not the exercise of faith, which is less than perfect on our part. The condition for salvation is perfect righteousness and death for sins. And the Lord Jesus Christ provided those things in his advent. That’s why he took on a human body.

He didn’t take on a human body to be a moral example to us—live your lives like I live my life—and a moral picture of God’s wrath against sin on the cross. Now those things are both true. We want to look at Christ and his example. But he came for a specific purpose: to by his act of obedience secure salvation through the imputation of his righteousness or justice to our account by God. See, it’s not a moral example.

Christ came to affect deliverance by giving satisfaction for the terms of the eternal covenant made between the Father and the Son. The terms were perfect righteousness and death for sin. And so the Arminian says, “Well, we don’t want God’s election to be specific and not conditioned. So we’re going to say that his election really is just that he’s decided now. He can decide whatever he wants to decide. What he decides is faith is the condition for the covenant, not the perfect satisfaction of his wrath and not the perfect imputation of a perfect righteousness.” You see, he changes the terms of the covenant.

But God’s election is an election that’s based upon a just covenantal satisfaction accomplished through the work of the Lord Jesus Christ historically 2,000 years ago. Because God’s election takes place in the eternal council of God, there is no changeableness or mutability to God’s election. It is fixed. That’s the basis for this doctrine we’ll talk about today—the assurance of salvation.

And ultimately unconditional election is different from the Armenians because it is not anthropocentric. It’s not man-centered. It is theocentric. It is God-centered. It doesn’t say that man is the source of salvation. It says that God is. And it doesn’t say that the end result of it is for the well-being of man. The end result is the glory of God. It’s according to his sovereign good pleasure, and it’s to the praise of the glory of his grace.

Unconditional election is theocentric both in its source. The good pleasure of God is the source for election, the basis for it. And the purpose is not the well-being of man. The purpose is to the praise of the glory of his grace. And so Arminianism and Calvinism—when it comes to election—are wise in the road where one wise says, “We want to go the way of man being this determiner of things, man being God, man being the one whose pleasure or whose goodness is achieved by all this,” as opposed to the godly side of the fork in the road, the right hand side, which says, “The reason for all this is God’s good pleasure, that he affects salvation and sovereignty apart from much of the Lord Jesus Christ’s historical work, and he does so to the praise of the glory of his grace.” God-centered versus a man-centered religion.

Now, so that’s the way of review, and today we want to talk about the doctrine of assurance, and we want to begin by saying that the scriptures tell us that the elect are assured of salvation. That is a fact. We begin then with the fact of the elect’s assurance, and your outline basically takes as its major points statements directly from the Canons of Dort, and we’ll go through those very briefly and we’ll read some scripture along the path and then we’ll have some concluding remarks by way of application.

And so hopefully you got both an outline and the statement—the one page—of having articles 12, 13, and 14. Only the ones we’ll deal with today are 12 and 13. But we begin first of all with the fact of the election assurance of faith. And article 12 says: the elect, in due time, through knowing various degrees different measures, attain the assurance of their eternal and unchangeable election.

And when we read from Romans 8 a couple of minutes ago, we read a statement to the truth of God’s security of the believer, so to speak, of God’s assurance of our salvation. Verse 14 of Romans 8: “For as many as are led by the spirit of God, they are the sons of God. You have not received the spirit of bondage again to fear, but you have received the spirit of adoption, whereby we cry, ‘Aba, Father.’ It’s an accomplished fact—the assurance of our salvation. The spirit bears witness with our spirit that we are the children of God. Established fact—the fact of the assurance of our salvation.”

“If children, then heirs, and if we suffer, we shall be glorified together with him.”

The scriptures are replete with a number of passages that talk about assurance of salvation. They really—this is a very established doctrine throughout scripture. Let me just read a few passages.

Every Lord’s day, we come here in obedience to the book of Hebrews where we read that we are to draw near with a true heart in full assurance of faith, having our hearts sprinkled from evil conscience and our bodies washed with pure water. When we come forward in obedience to the command to come forward and worship God, we do so with full assurance of faith taught by the scriptures.

In 1 John 5, in verse 13 of 1 John 5, we read, “These things have I written unto you that believe on the name of the son of God, that you may know that you have eternal life, and that you may believe on the name of the son of God.” Specifically written—this particular text of scripture—that we might know that we have as a present possession eternal life in the Lord Jesus Christ. And if it’s eternal life, Jesus said that neither can any man pluck them out of my hand.

Romans 8, that we just responsively read again on this Lord’s day, we have for several weeks now: “None of these things can separate us from the love of God and the Lord Jesus Christ.” The scriptures are written that we might know we have eternal life.

In the gospels, Jesus said that he sends this comforter—the spirit of truth—and the assurance of election. The assurance of our salvation in election is really linked in the scriptures to the gift of the Holy Spirit. The word for assurance really sort of can be translated or interpreted as a down payment or a assurance, a certainty of something written down, of something that’s not yet fully realized. And in scripture, last week we read in Ephesians that is what the Holy Spirit is given to us as—he is that down payment, as it were. He is the evidence that we are fully secured in our salvation through the work of the Lord Jesus Christ.

In Acts 5:32 we read that we are witnesses of these things, and so is also the Holy Ghost, whom God hath given to them that obey him. So God gives the Holy Spirit to those who have been brought into the faith of the Lord Jesus Christ as evidenced by their obedience.

Galatians 3:2: “This only would I learn of you: receive the spirit by the works of the law or by the hearing of faith?” Through the hearing of faith, those that are brought to regeneration sovereignly by God are given the Holy Spirit. And the Holy Spirit is the guarantee, so to speak, of the assurance of our salvation.

Acts 15:8: “God which knoweth their hearts bare them witness, giving them the Holy Ghost even as he did unto us.”

1 John 3:24: “Hereby we know that he abideth in us by the spirit which he gives us.”

So the purpose of the spirit being given to us, as our Savior said, is that he would go and a comforter would come. And 1 John says that we might know that we have eternal life by this spirit that he has given to us. We might know these things. So the Holy Spirit’s role in this is very emphatic and highlighted in the words of scripture.

As I said, from Ephesians 1, last week, verses 13 and 14, says that we were sealed with the Holy Spirit of promise. So you have a double emphasis there: we were sealed by the Holy Spirit. Our assurance is secured and it is a Holy Spirit of promise—sure, fixed knowledge of God’s salvation. And then verse 14: “which is the earnest of our inheritance unto the redemption of our purchase possession unto the praise of the glory of his grace.” So this is the assurance of our possession of eternal life in the Lord Jesus Christ, the Holy Spirit that’s given to us on the basis of Christ’s work.

Ephesians 4, verses 29 and following, says, “Let no corrupt communication proceed out of your mouth, but that which is good to the use of edifying that may minister grace unto the hearers, and grieve not the Holy Spirit of God, whereby ye are sealed unto the day of redemption.”

Sealing aspect through the gift of the Holy Spirit. So the Holy Spirit is seen here as affecting the assurance of believers.

2 Timothy 1: Paul says in verse 11 and following, “I’m appointed a preacher.” Verse 12: “For which cause I also suffer these things. Nevertheless, I am not ashamed, for I know whom I have believed, and am persuaded that he is able to keep that which I have committed unto him against that day.”

So from beginning to end of the scriptures, repeatedly through New Testament, the fact of the assurance of the believer is stated over and over and over again. This assurance of the believer is then a biblical doctrine. It is clearly testified to in scripture.

Here’s what the Westminster confession says about this doctrine. In the Confession of Faith, it says that this assurance is “the testimony of the spirit of adoption, witnessing with our spirits that we are the children of God.” And then the catechism says this: “Can true believers be infallibly assured that they are in the estate of grace and that they shall persevere therein unto salvation?” And the answer from the catechism is this: “Such as truly believe in Christ and endeavor to walk in all good conscience before him may, without extraordinary revelation—okay, so in other words, by means of normal revelation, the word of God that the spirit writes upon our hearts—without extraordinary revelation, by faith granted upon the truth of God’s promises, those promises recorded in the scriptures, and the spirit enabling them to discern in themselves those graces to which the promises of life are made, and bearing witness with their spirits that they are the children of God.”

You’ll notice the language there from 1 John. The spirit bears witness with our spirit that we are the children of God. “By them they can then be infallibly assured that they are in the estate of grace and shall persevere therein unto salvation.”

The fact of the assurance of the believer in the Lord Jesus Christ, the fact secured by the giving of the Holy Spirit as the down payment, the seal, the guarantee that our salvation has been accomplished once for all, we can rest with a sure knowledge that God will bring that to pass in time.

Then now—so the fact of the elect’s assurance is clearly documented in the scriptures. And in the Canons of Dort they say that this evidence of this assurance of salvation comes about in due time. And in actually the Latin text, it says in God’s time. All due time is God’s time, isn’t it? God’s time. In due time always refers to when God feels it proper and appropriate and in his omniscience to bring things to pass.

And there is a differentiation then of time relative to the assurance of salvation. I mentioned the thief on the cross in your outline. Obviously, he did not receive assurance of salvation until just moments before his death, and others receive it quite early on in life. So God reveals the assurance of our salvation to us in due time.

And so if you have some degree of doubt in your heart, do not feel overwhelmed by that, because God brings about assurance in due time. We’ve said that it is a fact of the believer’s life and his experience. The testimony of spirit testifies to it. But don’t assume by that it is a perpetual state. And don’t assume by that you are going to be given it when you want to have it given to you. But rather, it is the assurance that comes about in due time.

It is, secondly, the Canons of Dort say, to be found in various degrees and various measures. We’ve talked before about Romans 7, the last half of Romans 7, where Paul struggles with the fact of his sin and his failure to keep the law of God, and his failure to control his body, and his failure to fulfill the motivation to honor God in all that he does and says. Well, Romans 7 pictures then that at various times we don’t have the fullness of assurance. We have at it other times. We struggle with our salvation. We struggle with the effects of our sin. And so there are various measures or degrees to which we have this assurance of salvation.

In Colossians 4:12, we see Paul praying for the Colossians. And he says that he prays this: “that you might stand perfect and complete in all the will of God.” The word complete there could be and probably is better translated “fully assured.” Paul prays for the Colossians to the end that they might stand perfect and fully assured of their salvation and relationship to God in all the will of God.

Well, if Paul prays that for believers, then it’s an indication that it is experienced by us or apprehended by us or appropriated by us in various degrees, in various measures. Doubt is a powerful thing and we are not free from doubt. While doubt is sin, nonetheless, we do find ourselves in this life. And so the assurance of salvation may not be yours today. Maybe something’s happened in the last couple of days in your life. Maybe sin has occurred in your life. Maybe you’ve had tested—maybe not through direct sin of your own, but through difficult circumstances. Maybe you wonder, “Does God really love me? Is his hand upon me for good?”

Well, you don’t want to despair at that. You don’t want to despair at that. You want to recognize that we are to seek that assurance of salvation. It will be given in due time and in various degrees and measures.

And I might also say, by way of application, that we are called to minister grace to one another with our tongues. We read about that in the passage recently quoted here in this sermon from Ephesians. We’re to minister grace. And one of the ways we minister grace is by assuring each other of the salvation of God when doubt raises its head.

If our election—the assurance of election—is on God’s evidence of the spirit, we’ll get to in just a moment, and not our decision, then we’re going to react to people’s problem with assurance differently than we would if we were Arminian in our thinking.

In other words, someone at church, some friend of yours, who’s been evidencing the fruit of the spirit in his life, who’s made a profession of faith repeatedly, whose life is based upon obedience to the Lord Jesus Christ, has found himself in difficult circumstances—either of his own making or of God’s sovereign disposing in his life through difficulties, trials, and tribulations or his own sin, whatever it is—and now he’s doubting things.

Well, the Arminian may come to him and say, “Well, you’ve got to believe. You got to pray the prayer right now then, because that’s really the way—you’ve got to secure this thing—is to pray the prayer and receive God’s forgiveness.” But we would want to say, “No, we want to bolster people up. We want to tell them that doubt is sin. You’ve evidenced the good fruit of salvation. You make the profession of the faith in the Lord Jesus Christ.”

Now we want you to repent of that sin. We want to tell people that gently. We want to tell them that in a loving way, in an understanding way. We ought to understand the pain and the suffering that doubt brings into the life. But we want to move them away from the doubt. We don’t want to increase their doubt by somehow getting them to think about their own works and whether they prayed the prayer correctly or not or whether they were sincere enough in their belief of the Lord Jesus Christ. You see what I’m saying the difference there?

Well, it comes in various degrees and stages.

Secondly, the Canons of Dort tell us that the experiential source of assurance flows from the evidence of their election. Now, how do we know that we’re—where does this assurance come from? And what the Canons of Dort say is that first of all, the evidence—what we look for then to know if I’m alive or not—are the evidences of life. You know, if you go out to a tree, is the tree dead or alive? Well, you look for green leaves. You look for sap running. You look for if you nick the tree, is there sap coming out of it? There’s and there’s probably a lot more things than that to look for. Takashi could tell us a little better. But there are evidences of life in the tree.

So when we want to look at the assurance of salvation, what brings us this assurance? And the way the Canons of Dort word it is that “the elect in due time, through various degrees and different measures, attain the assurance of their eternal and unchangeable election, not by intrusively prying into the secret and deep things of God, but” and here’s the positive statement: “observing in themselves at the spiritual joy and holy pleasure the infallible fruits of election pointed out in the word of God, such as a true faith in Christ, a filial godly sorrow for sin, a hungering and thirsting after righteousness, etc.”

So when we want assurance of salvation, the scriptures say the way to affect that in our lives and the way to direct your children to it and the way to direct other believers as you minister grace to them is to have them look at the fruits of their election, such as faith in the Lord Jesus Christ itself.

Again, in the scriptures, the scriptures tell us that faith is the assurance of things hoped for, Hebrews 11:1—the existence of things, or the evidence rather of things not seen—of faith in the Lord Jesus Christ. Is the person you’re talking to dependent upon your works for your right standing with God or do you cling to the Lord Jesus Christ?

Usually in this church, with people who have evidenced the fruit of the spirit and election, the Lord Jesus Christ and been with us for evidence that election, what we’re going to find at a time of doubt is that people are clinging even more to the Lord Jesus Christ. They’re even more aware of their own shortcomings, of their own inabilities, their own sin, their own tendency to wander, and if they are convinced of that, and if their doubt springs from sin in their life, but that sin is driving them to an assurance of faith in the Lord Jesus Christ—in other words, that he and he alone, outside of me, is the basis for my right standing with God—then that person, even in their struggles, are evidencing fruits that should be pointed out to them as assurance of their election. You see what I’m saying?

Faith in the Lord Jesus Christ. How can we exercise faith apart from the grace of God? It is an evidence of the fruit of the spirit in our lives. It’s an evidence that the spirit is inside of us, so to speak, at the depth of our being, calling us to despair of ourselves all our Romans 7, and to cling to the realization that there’s no condemnation to us because we’re covenantal in the Lord Jesus Christ in Romans 8. There’s this progression, and the progression happens as we evidence—you see, the evidence of the salvation in our lives—true faith in the Lord Jesus Christ as evidence of our salvation and as a result is one of the things we look for assurance of salvation.

Secondly, filial fear. The passage from Romans 8 that we read says that as many as are led by the spirit of God, they are the sons of God. See, again, if you’re led by the spirit of God, the spirit of God comes—Jesus said—to teach you things of him, to point to the Lord Jesus Christ. So if in your life you’re led by the spirit, if you profess faith in Jesus and you cling to the Lord Jesus Christ, then indeed it says, “they are the sons of God.”

You have a reason to know that your salvation is secured eternally in the Lord Jesus Christ. And he goes on to say, “You have not received the spirit of bondage again to fear, but you have received the spirit of adoption, whereby we cry, ‘Aba, Father.’”

A filial fear—by that is meant not a slavish fear. You know, the fear of God is supposed to be a present component of the believer’s life, but it’s not the cringing kind of slavish fear before a master, that there is no relationship relative to love. The kind of fear we have should be the fear of the son who loves the Father and yet is fearful of displeasing him, and also fearful of the Father’s chastisements—the rod—to come down upon him. A filial fear, and we cry out in our spirits, “Aba, Father,” in the midst of difficulties. “Lord God, help me.” And that is an evidence of election. That’s the fruit of the spirit at work in your life. And that is one of the ways God brings you to an assurance of salvation.

Three, or C rather, a godly sorrow for sin. It is a godly sorrow for sin. Esau was sorry for his sin because he saw that when he gave away the inheritance, it hurt him in terms of temporal blessings. There’s a sorrow that’s not true biblical repentance. It’s a sorrow over the effects of sin. Now, that has nothing to do with being the basis for the assurance of our forgiveness. But when we sorrow after sin—the way that Paul recites it in Romans 7—when we have a repentance for sins because we’ve offended the mighty God, the holy God of all creation, and when we are sorry that we can’t do the thing we want to do, our heart motivates us to keep the law of God and to control the members of our body, etc., and when we are sorry we cannot do it because we’ve offended God, that is a true evangelical sorrow. That’s an evangelical repentance, as opposed to a sorrow for the effects of sin.

And that sorrow for sin is an evidence of the spirit’s fruit in your life. So when you’re even under times of sin in your life, you can see then the evidence of God’s election bringing you to an assurance of faith as you observe in yourself this godly sorrow for sin.

Hungering and thirsting after righteousness. Blessed are those who hunger and thirst after righteousness. What does this mean? Well, it means that we recognize that we have no righteousness in and of ourselves, no justice in and of who we are. Blessed are the poor in spirit—those who recognize their poverty in spirit. All should be hungry and thirsting after righteousness. But the ethical rebel doesn’t deal with his knowledge that he has no righteousness in himself. He covers it all over.

So if you hunger and thirst over a better walk in your external observance to the dictates of God’s word, then if you hunger and thirst after that justice and righteousness in your own life, or if you hunger and thirst for the righteousness of God manifested in our culture, these are evidences of your election, and they should cause you to rest, knowing that your salvation has been eternally secured through the work of the Lord Jesus Christ.

And then they say “etc.” You know, and we would want to—for instance—add in there love of the brethren. In 1 John, the word “know”—the word translated “know” occurs 42 times in that little epistle of 1 John. 1 John over and over and over, this is how you know that you’re in God. And repeatedly what happens in that epistle is the love of the brethren is the indication that the spirit of God is indeed working in the context of our hearts.

We read in chapter 3:14: “We know, we know, we have assurance that we have passed from death into life. How? Because we love the brethren. He that loveth not his brother abideth in death.”

See, and then again in verse 18: “My little children, let us not love in word, neither in tongue, but in deed and in truth. And hereby we know that we are of the truth and shall assure our hearts before him.” We assure our hearts before God. We know we’re of the truth if we love in word and in deed, not just deed, not just word, in word and deed. Loving our brother.

See, the evidence of assurance of our salvation is this love for the brother that the spirit brings to pass in the context of our lives. Now, this is a little tricky because the flesh—the old man—wants to justify itself too. He wants assurance of his salvation. And he also is going to look for not his relationship to God, but the man who rejects Christ. Rather his relationship to his fellow man. “I’m a good guy. I’m okay. Life will be okay with me because I treat my brother well. I treat people good.” Forget his obedience to God.

The thing that so in other words, God does give us the love of the brethren as an indication of a relationship to him, to God. First tablet, second tablet—how to love God, how to love your neighbor as yourself. But you see, it is a tablet. It is a law. The flesh, the pagan, wants to say, “I love humanity too.” But his love is defined by his own standard. That’s the difference.

So when we say that another indication of our assurance of salvation, of our election that leads to assurance, is the love of the brother, it’s the love of the brother as dictated by God’s law, because John goes on to say in verse 22: “and whatsoever we ask we receive of him, because we keep his commandments. And he goeth in verse 24: “He that keepeth his commandments dwelleth in him, and he in him, and hereby we know that he abideth in us by the spirit which he hath given us.”

The spirit is tied to the word. The word is a grace word to us, but it’s also a command word. And so that, as we love our brother as defined by the commandments, not by our own decision of how we’re going to interact with people, then we have this assurance of salvation working.

Now, a contrary way, 1 John goes on and on—the epistle goes on and on—to say that if we don’t do these things, if we hate our brother, then we have no assurance of our salvation.

So then the Canons of Dort say that there are these evidences. We want to add on to that one of the prime evidences the scriptures give us—from the book of 1 John—to assure our hearts before him is our relationship to one another in the context of the body of Christ. Okay.

Another thing we’d want to add on is the fruits of the spirit. The fruits of the spirit, because that’s really what we’re talking about in all of these. All of these are fruits of the spirit. Our spirit, our fallen spirit, hates our brother. Our fallen spirit has no love “Aba, Father” for God. Our fallen spirit has no faith in Christ. Our fallen spirit has no real biblical sorrow over sin. It’s sorrow over the consequences.

So it is all these things really are the fruit of the spirit. So when we talk about the “etc” here, we want to fill in also the fruit of the spirit in the context of our lives.

So the Canons of Dort rightly point us to an examination of our lives—a observing in our lives the fruit of the spirit—as the basis for our assurance that we are eternally saved.

Now notice that this is a radically different way to achieve assurance than most of us have been presented with. You probably all of these are not based upon remembering the decision we made. There’s nothing here about: “Well, what you want to do if you’re doubting your salvation is go back and remember the day you made a decision for the Lord Jesus Christ. When did you pray the prayer? Did you nail the stake in the backyard? Did you put the date on it? Because that’s the basis of your right standing.”

The Arminian position sees in our decision the energizing of salvation for us. And so when it gets down to assurance, it also looks to our decision made at some point in time in the past as the basis for our assurance.

But the biblical position—the Calvinistic, Augustinian position, the Reformational position—is that we look at the sovereign work of God for our assurance. We don’t look at our own efforts. We look at the observation of God’s fruit in our life. And we recognize that I couldn’t do any of this. This is the work of the spirit. And if I have the spirit, I have the down payment, the earnest, the pledge of my eternal salvation in the Lord Jesus Christ.

So there’s a looking not at our decision. There’s a looking in, not at that criteria, but looking at the criteria of the evidences of life. Does the tree have leaves? Is the bark going? Not: “What day was the tree planted?” See, it’s the evidences of the spirit’s life.

Now, the spirit then assures our hearts in two ways. He assures our heart of salvation by the word of God. And he assures our heart of salvation by these evidences of his work in our lives. And both those things—the word externally to us that we read in the scriptures and the observation of the fruit of the spirit in our life—both of these are made possible through that Holy Spirit. And so when we read that he is the pledge of our assurance, the guarantee of our salvation, it’s because he witnesses to the truth of God’s word that says we’re forgiven in Christ. And he causes to come to pass in our life those green sprouts and twigs and sap running through our veins, so to speak, of a new humanity in Christ.

And so, doing the Holy Spirit brings us to that assurance of our salvation in varying degrees, different times, differing measures. Nonetheless, that assurance comes. Assurance comes.

Okay. The canons go on to speak of the manner of this observation. These things are observed first of all with the spiritual joy. The Apostle Paul in Romans 8, again—boy, he gets through that great statement about “who can separate us from the love of God?” And “what shall we say to these things?” These are wondrous truths. He says, he has a spiritual joy in observing these fruits and of knowing these truths of the word and then the work of the spirit inside his heart. He comes to a wonderful, delightful joy in all these things.

And secondly, this observation is made with holy pleasure. It’s a pleasure because we want to see the manifestation of righteousness in our land and in our hearts. And as we see these evidences of our assurance, we observe them not just coldly—okay, now we’re okay, we’re saved now. We can really be sure we’re saved. No—as a delight in it. And there’s a pleasure in knowing that we’re being transformed from sinful people to people that are righteous now and that the culture, as the gospel is preached out, will also manifest a righteousness and a justice. There’s a holy pleasure in the assurance of our salvation that’s affected.

And then the canons go on to talk about the experiential results of this assurance in the next head of doctrine, which is number 13. And the sense and certainty of this election afford to the children of God additional matter for and here are the results—the experiential results of this assurance, daily humiliation before him, adoring the depths of his mercies, for cleansing themselves and rendering grateful returns of ardent love to him who first manifested so great love toward them.

So positively speaking, the results of this assurance—so we talked about the fact that assurance is given to us securely throughout the scriptures. We’re to come to an assurance of faith. It varies in time and degree, but we’re to come to it. We will come to it. We can be infallibly certain of our election. We can be secure. And in fact, the scriptures are written for this very purpose—that we might know that we have eternal life.

And then we said that the basis of that assurance is not our decision. The basis is the observation of the external signs of the spirit’s work in our life in the context of our profession of faith in Christ, a clinging to him, and manifestation of the fruit of the spirit through the love of the brethren, filial fear that our hearts cry out “Aba, Father.” So we looked at those things.

And if that’s in place, then what is this going to usher forth into? Because see, the Calvinists were despised. They say, “Well, if you really believe that you’re eternally saved, then you’re just going to, you know, hang out and do nothing.” But no, the canons of Dort—very in a very wise use of the apologetic manner—it says, “No, if we really come to an assurance of salvation, the scriptures teach the result of this assurance is first of all a daily humiliation before God.”

Do you see why? Because we haven’t placed our basis for assurance in our decision. We place it in the sovereign work of God, his sovereign assurance in our lives based on his sovereign election and him sovereignly producing these fruits in our lives. So it causes us to be daily humble before God. It’s the reverse of pride. If we thought there was something that we did to affect our salvation, then we have pride before God. But when we come to acknowledge that God is the source of all things, including our assurance of salvation, it brings forth a daily humiliation before him.

Show Full Transcript (46,918 characters)
Collapse Transcript

COMMUNION HOMILY

No communion homily recorded.

Q&A SESSION

Q1:
Questioner: You mentioned that the doctrine of assurance leads to humiliation before God, adoration of His mercies, cleansing ourselves, and rendering grateful returns of love. Can you explain how understanding assurance of election produces these four results?

Pastor Tuuri: So if you understand the doctrine of assurance, you come to a daily humiliation of yourself before God, a batting down of pride and a humbling yourself to God. And secondly, to an adoring the depths of his mercies. We’re humbled, but we’re humbled to the end of knowing that we haven’t been brought left in that sorry state of humiliation, but rather God has brought us up and he has poured out upon us the riches of his grace.

You know, it’s the Heidelberg Catechism all over again, isn’t it? Those of you who are in Dave H.’s study, you’ve heard me talk about it from the pulpit. The depth of our sin and misery and how I am redeemed from sins and misery. That’s the wondrous knowledge that comes to us as with an understanding of God’s unconditional election and God’s unconditional assurance as well—unconditioned on our part.

And then third, a cleansing of themselves. How I am to be thankful to God for such a tremendous deliverance. Right? We want to cleanse ourselves. Then we want to see more work of the spirit in our lives. We want to deny the flesh. We want to take up our cross and see ourselves united to Christ in that we might also be glorified with him. And fourth, rendering grateful returns of ardent love to him who first manifested so great a love toward us.

The doctrine of assurance is not some cold intellectual truth. It is a heartfelt truth at the center of our being that results in a humiliation before God, a wondrous adoration of his mercies, and a loving hymn for his great love to us.

Q2:
Questioner: Does assurance of election lead to carelessness about obedience to God’s commands?

Pastor Tuuri: God gave us election and gave us the assurance of salvation not based upon any work of ours but rather the manifestation of the spirit’s life flowing through us. Negatively, the canons say that there is no remissiveness in the observance of the divine commands—no remissiveness in observance of the divine commands. Indeed, by their fruits you shall know them. Our whole life is to be an indication of the spirit of God. So we’re not—as a result of assurance—made into people that don’t care about doing good things anymore.

Just the reverse. In 1 Thessalonians 1, we read the following as Paul writes to them: “We give thanks to God always for you all, making mention of you in our prayers, remembering without ceasing your work of faith, labor of love, and patience of hope in our Lord Jesus Christ in the sight of God our Father, knowing brethren, beloved, your election of God.” See, Paul knew the election of these people of God based upon their evidencing that election through their work of faith, labor of love, and patience of hope.

Election, the assurance of election is tied then to our grateful response to God for such election through a labor of love, a work of faith, an act of doing what God has called us to do.

Q3:
Questioner: How does the practical comfort of assurance help us in our daily lives?

Pastor Tuuri: The doctrine of the eternal assurance of believers is certainly a doctrine of tremendous practical use to us because we become taken out of the game when doubt fills our heart. We become people with slack hands and cannot do things when doubt begins to fill our heart of our salvation in the Lord Jesus Christ. To know that God is not only unconditionally elected us on the basis of his forelove from before the creation of time and placing that love upon us, but then to know also that will usher forth into as the golden chain proceeds to our glorification.

To know that everything has been taken care of in the final sense for our salvation in the Lord Jesus Christ. This is a doctrine of tremendous comfort and adoration for the saint. You know, I don’t know about you, but I’ve got all kinds of things going on in my life. I thought when I got to be this age, things would kind of smooth out. No. I look back now when I was 20, 25, 30, those were smooth days. I got a lot of things going now. Children, all ages, different things I’m doing. It seems like life is just speeding up incredibly.

I remember talking with Vic and Dan and Mike over for Thanksgiving. We were driving around and Vic said, “Boy, you know, there was a time in my life when everything was kind of together, but now I’ve got all these little things I’m doing, none of which are tied off yet.” And you know, you want things to be tied off. You know what I mean? You don’t like all these projects going that require attention. And it’s like I’m surrounded by all these projects requiring my attention. And I know that you know that the heads of households particularly and the mothers too, but the dad certainly here know what I’m talking about. You got all kinds of things that fill up your life and very few of them reach a point of conclusion where you can be taken off the sphere out of the chain of events.

We have all these things going on. Well, what I’m trying to say is that the one thing that undergirds all other things, our relationship to God and the security of our salvation, that thing has been tied off definitively. That thing you can’t do anything about losing. That thing isn’t dependent upon your works or the works of people around you or the success of this church or the success of this particular government or the success of your business. None of that touches this thing that undergirds who you are as a Christian called in the Lord Jesus Christ.

Health can’t remove that from you. Poor health. Debt can’t remove that from you. Disobedience on your part ultimately can’t remove that from you. You know, that is an area that’s tied off and that gives us a tremendous source of comfort and rest as we observe these fruits of the spirit. It is a very practical doctrine on that part of the issue so to speak.

Q4:
Questioner: How do biblical promises of God’s protection relate to the doctrine of assurance?

Pastor Tuuri: When we read in the scriptures verses like these—Isaiah 43: “When thou passest through the waters I will be with you, and through the rivers they shall not overflow thee. When thou walkest through the fire, thou shalt not be burned, neither shall the flame kindle upon thee.” Or in Isaiah 54: “No weapon that is formed against thee shall prosper, and every tongue that shall rise against thee in judgment, thou shalt condemn. This is the knowledge, this is the heritage rather, of the servants of the Lord, and the righteousness is of me, saith the Lord. The righteousness is of me.”

Or 1 Corinthians 15: “Therefore, my beloved brethren, be steadfast, unmovable, always abiding in the work of the Lord, for as much as ye know that your labor is not in vain in the Lord.” Or Calvin in his commentary on assurance quotes from 2 Corinthians 4:8-10 in his own particular translation: “We are afflicted yet not made anxious. We fail but are not deserted. We are humbled but not confounded. We are cast down but have not perished, ever bearing the mortification of Jesus Christ about in our bodies that Jesus’s life may be manifested in us.”

Yes, we are buffeted by trials and tribulations and difficulties. But at the very center of our being, there is this peace. The work of righteousness results in this peace. And the fruit of righteousness is this assurance and rest before God.

And Christian in the Lord Jesus Christ, know of a certainty that these scriptures are true. Know at the depth of your being that your salvation has been secured once for all through the work of the Lord Jesus Christ. His election of you is not conditioned upon your faith. Your assurance of salvation is also not conditioned upon your works. It’s conditioned upon the sureness of the word of God who cannot lie. Who said that as surely as you evidence these fruits of the spirit, so surely you are to know infallibly that you are elect in the Lord Jesus Christ and your destination, your calling has been made sure in the Lord Jesus Christ. It has been secured by the Holy Trinity.

The Father has elected a people. Jesus Christ has come to earth. His advent was for the purpose of affecting your eternal security through his work and his act of obedience and his work on the cross. And the Holy Spirit has come as the comforter to comfort you at the depth of your being with the true comfort of all comforts that your relationship to God the Father through the work of Jesus has been secured and the Spirit witnesses that to you.

Q5:
Questioner: How does communion relate to assurance?

Pastor Tuuri: We have communion. And you know, we think of having people over to eat, but you know, in the culture in which the Old Testament found itself, when you had a person over to eat, it wasn’t just to kind of get to know your neighbor. When you had a person at a meal, he was brought under your sovereign protection. There was a bond of friendship through that eating together and covenanting together. That meant that he was now adopted into your family, as it were, for the period of time that he was in relationship with you.

Well, when we go to communion today, that’s what God wants us to think. We’re sitting at the table as his children, as his sons and daughters. And daddy is powerful. Daddy has all the guns. He’s got all the power. He’s got all the smarts in the world. He is father. And as father, he feeds you at his table today, be assured at the depth of your being that his love is upon you in the Lord Jesus Christ.

And yes, it doesn’t mean you’re going to have a trial-free life, but it does mean that part of your life is totally taken care of through the work of the Lord Jesus Christ. The triune God of scripture wants you to know that today and wants you to rest in that security.

Q6:
Questioner: You mentioned that the modern doctrine of assurance based on personal decision can lead to carnal security. Can you explain this further?

Pastor Tuuri: But you know there are people that don’t rest in that security. The kind of assurance that we’re talking about where God discriminates, he gives assurance to some and not to others based upon his election some and not others is offensive to modern man. You know the canons said we want to avoid carnal security on the one hand and we want to avoid remissness of duty on the other.

Well, you know, if you base your assurance ultimately on your decision for Jesus Christ, that tends to carnal security. If you always look back on your decision when you prayed the prayer as your basis of security as opposed to the evidence of the spirit in your life, that has the capability to lead to carnal security, a security that doesn’t work diligently.

On the other hand, if you think that your assurance of salvation is dependent upon your personal perseverance in the faith—not the perseverance that God affects for you, but rather your perseverance in doing what’s right—that’s going to lead to a frenzy on your part. The two poles here that we want to avoid is the sloth based on the carnal security that “it’s my decision 20 years ago that affected my eternal security” or the frenzy activity that says “it’s my perseverance, it’s my works that going to keep me safe before God”—because no works are ultimately enough to keep us safe.

And we want to go in between those two to say, “No, it’s not a decision. It’s God’s election of me.” And yes, it is an election of me. There’s a phrase, “Once saved, always saved.” That’s part true. If you’ve been saved, you’re certainly eternally saved. But the doctrine of salvation is what’s truncated in that version, that phrase that’s put out today. Because we believe salvation is a calling from God.

What did that passage from Romans 8 tell us? It says that we’re to be led by the spirit. It doesn’t say we’re once saved always saved. That salvation is not what we’re talking about. The doctrine of assurance is not insurance that you buy once and then put it in the filing cabinet and forget it. That’s not the doctrine of assurance. The doctrine of assurance is a living breathing truth that’s based upon being led by the spirit of God. It’s this being led by the spirit of God on a day-by-day basis that demonstrates that we are sons of God.

And it says that we have not received the spirit of doctrine of bondage. We received the spirit of adoption. We’ve been brought into the new humanity of the Lord Jesus Christ. The spirit bears witness that we are the children of God and of children heirs with God and joint heirs with the Lord Jesus Christ. We are on his side now. And in the context of world history, his side is against people on the other side of the equation.

We have been saved but in that salvation have been called, once called, always called to be active in our labor for the Lord Jesus Christ to be part of his army to go forth preaching his gospel and praying for the manifestation of his judgments in the context of the earth.

The doctrine of assurance is a tremendous doctrine of comfort, but it is also a doctrine that helps us to avoid a tremendous temptation in our day and age.

Q7:
Questioner: How does understanding true assurance help us resist the false security offered by the civil state?

Pastor Tuuri: Why do we have the rise of statism today? Ultimately, it’s through a failure of an understanding of the doctrine of assurance. What am I talking about? Man wants assurance. Man wants to know, he wants to be preserved in a state of salvation or what he perceives as salvation. If we deny God’s assurance, then we’re going to seek assurance through some other mechanism.

Now, to some people that assurance is sought through money. Assurance and preservation are linked doctrines. Some people the way we preserve ourselves, our state of well-being, our assurance that’s going to keep us is having enough money in the bank. And so we’re driven not to service and calling for the Lord Jesus Christ. We’re no longer heirs with Christ—where somehow we got this insurance policy. We’re really going to depend on our daily assurance, our money in the bank or our health.

Or maybe we’re going to rely upon the institutional church. That’s another common error. But in our day and age, the way to achieve assurance and preservation for most people is through the civil state. It’s through the civil state. And the civil state will provide an assurance of well-being for every member of the culture that conforms to the civil state’s call.

The doctrine of assurance is a doctrine of God’s unconditional assurance of his elect in the Lord Jesus Christ. And if we have that at the heart of our being, we don’t need the state. And we’re not going to be tempted by the promise of money, the promise of health, the promise of the institutional church, or the promise of the civil state to provide for us the unconditional assurance we already have in the Lord Jesus Christ.

See, instead, we’re going to be able to resist those temptations. In the Magnificat, we’ve talked about this before, but the advent of the Lord Jesus Christ has a result as portrayed in Mary’s song where she magnifies the Lord and the rulers are pulled down and the humble ones are exalted in terms of civil rule. And that’s why it was outlawed in some countries in the past. Civil rulers didn’t like that being said.

How does that come to pass? We know it doesn’t come to pass through revolution. We know the scriptures speak against that. It comes to pass by people like you and people like me having no need for the kind of despotic civil rulers that promise eternal security and assurance for people. We don’t need them anymore. And so we’re going to exalt people who have a limited role of civil government that are submissive to the eternal assurance of God for his elect.

You see the difference there? The doctrine of assurance is a practical purpose to bring us comfort. It’s also of tremendous practical use in helping us to avoid the temptations of the civil state. It’s an amazing thing.

Q8:
Questioner: How do you respond to the charge that Calvinism tends to foster pride by claiming to be among the elect?

Questioner: You mentioned Rush Dooney and others. Can you explain the distinction between the Calvinist and Arminian positions on election?

Pastor Tuuri: Well, of course, that’s an odd charge to have made against Calvinism because the whole point of it is that there’s nothing in us that merited our choice. It wasn’t that God saw that we would respond and that others wouldn’t. So really, you know, everybody knows that there’s some election, some doctrine of election is taught. The Armenian conditions the election upon his decision. And so really the Arminian position is more subject to the charge of pride because he’s made a difference in his decision that other people didn’t.

So really you can’t get around election. And if we’re saying that the difference that we make is that election is unconditional, then really it’s our view, the scriptural view that abases man and humbles his pride. Does that help?

Q9:
Questioner: I’ve always had difficulty explaining to other people the differences between Calvinism and Arminianism. I always thought that Arminianism was looking at it from man’s perspective and Calvinism were looking at it from God’s perspective. And if you look at it that way, I think most of us came out of Arminian churches. As we know, and I would assume that to be a mature Christian, let’s say you would naturally grow to the other side, let’s say, or the Holy Spirit would lead you to understanding the sovereignty of God. Do you have any thoughts about that?

Pastor Tuuri: Well, okay, it would be worth we could have an extended discussion about this because really most of us came out of three or four point Calvinistic churches. I mean, very few of us came out of churches that believe, for instance, you could lose your salvation. But that’s what Arminianism actually says. So we come out of the churches that are like that halfway thing—”once saved, always saved.” But the doctrine of salvation is so truncated that it becomes kind of a perversion.

Now mixed in with it is this Arminian stuff with, you know, this determinate decisional regeneration, you know, that it’s our decision that does this stuff that’s intermixed in there, too. But so I guess what I’m saying is that our culture really is not explicitly Arminian. It’s moved toward Arminianism, but it’s moved from a position that was originally Calvinistic.

The Baptist church in America, for instance, Rushdoony has pointed out they really have more of a lineage back to reformed congregationalism and the Puritan Puritans of the colonial period than they do back to the Anabaptist movement which was Arminian at the time of the Reformation. So it’s, you know, it’s kind of hard to think through this but really what we’re dealing with is a blend of Calvinism and Arminianism.

And as a result, you know, most people they haven’t thought it through very much. And once you begin to push people to study the scriptures and to think it through, I think that maturation you’re talking about happens then because, you know, they’re elect and they’re going to move into the doctrine of the truth. So it is a funny situation where we live now. I think that the Christian culture has become more—as we’ve gone along, you know, as history has gone along the last 50 years—but really it has been a blend of the churches we’ve come out of. They haven’t really been explicitly five-point Armenians. Usually they’re three or four point Calvinists. They just haven’t really thought through.

When we get to limited atonement, which is usually if somebody says they’re a four-point Calvinist, they mean they don’t believe in limited atonement. When we get to that, you will see based on the scriptural linkage of the atonement to all the effects of the atonement that it’s why people bulk at that position has to be primarily a problem of ignorance of scripture on the part of most churches today in conservative Bible believing churches. They’re just ignorant of what the scriptures teach about what the atonement is.

See, that’s the other problem we have is that these churches are, you know, kind of a blend between Calvinism and Arminianism, and they can stay in that position because the sermons are so watered down and contentless that the disparities in the system aren’t obvious. You know, it’s just kind of a lowest common denominator mentality. So nothing really gets pushed. As soon as you start to push it—what the atonement accomplishes—people should just see immediately what the result is intellectually based on the scriptures and go along with it.

And I think that’s why most of us will find the experiences of our friends and neighbors that same way. They will come this way because they have been born again. They are regenerate. They’ve had little or inferior teaching, and they’ve come out of a historical mishmash that was moving away from Calvinism toward Arminianism. But that’s had the effect on the culture round about us. I don’t know. That’s kind of rambling. Does that help at all?

Q10:
Questioner: I have a comment and a question. The comment would be regards to what I like to call pseudo-Arminianism. Someone used the term “well I’m a pseudo-Calvinist. I’m a three or four point Calvinist.” So, and I said, “Well, no, you’re a pseudo-Arminianist because if you reject one point of Calvinism, you’re rejecting them all.” You know, as John Gerstern pointed out in “Wrongly Dividing the Word of Truth,” you know, really it’s an Arminianism that has been so—how should we say—mismatched, you know, they can they can think themselves Calvinists when in fact they really aren’t in practice.

Pastor Tuuri: Yeah. So, but anyway, I think that’s correct. And I think that what happens is that the tendency then is to have your actions become more Arminian than your theology even is.

Questioner: Right. That’s what actually ends up occurring there.

Pastor Tuuri: Yeah. I agree with that. And then the as we were going through this thing on assurance here, something I thought that was curiously absent and I was going to ask you about that and why do you think that might be is as far as one of the marks of assurance is a desire of the knowledge of God and his truth. I notice here in the canons that at least under article 12 it is nowhere to be found and yet consistently I think through scripture and through the reformers and the Puritans believe that was a big part of it.

Pastor Tuuri: Well, I think you could probably see that in the hungering and thirsting after righteousness. Okay. Okay. That’s probably where they would put it, although that’s what I was trying to point out too is that when they say “et cetera” they know we’re just scratching the surface here because you know again the doctrine of the love of the brothers which is so much a part of 1 John again seems to be completely absent there. But yeah, good point that there is a hunger and a thirst for a knowledge of God and the doctrines of the scriptures that is an evidence of the spirit’s work in our lives.

Q11:
Questioner: I’ve talked with some people who would hold a viewpoint that we need to solely look for the love and the mercy in a person and not look for a desire for knowledge of truth. And even if the desire for the knowledge of truth and the desire to know God is not there, that’s okay. But they still demonstrate the fruits of the spirit. I’ve seen others make the dichotomy and go the opposite direction. And I would take that as being false. Would you agree with that?

Pastor Tuuri: Okay. If I understood your question correctly, it has to do with looking at assurance of salvation—one’s love and mercy toward his fellow man without the desire for God’s will. Absolutely correct. You’re right. That is false. And that’s why I said that as much as 1 John points out that’s an evidence and how we assure our heart before God, it’s a very dangerous thing.

That’s I think that’s why the epistle is so filled with the other side of it, you know, that there is this relationship to commandment. I mean, it is amazing. My wife years ago went through 1 John and just circled every reference either direct or inferential commandment or law in 1 John—the gospel of love—and it’s tremendous the number of you know, it’s just pithy with all these commandment references.

I think that’s why—because the natural man that is how he seeks to justify himself is by his supposed humanitarian impulses toward other men. So our old man, our flesh thinks he’s real good at doing that. So I agree with you that when that’s all you see and you don’t see the hunger and thirst for relationship to God and understanding of his doctrines in a depth of knowledge of his word, that there is real reason to suspect that. And particularly when that love of the brethren is disconnected, you know, from the law of God.

We don’t know how to love our brother, you know. We don’t have any natural instinct to love our brother. We have a natural instinct to hate our brother. But in the Spirit, he takes the law of God, writes it upon our hearts and tells us how to love our brother. And so when that disconnect is made, it is yeah, false assurance.

Q12:
Questioner: It seems like Calvinists don’t often have that much difficulty dealing with someone who’s Arminian or don’t even know they’re Arminian. So much as it has to do with dealing with someone who’s dispensational. And, you know, at the time of the Reformation, you know, that really wasn’t a big issue. As I understand it, dispensationalism came along later in the 1800s. Don’t you think that really colors a lot of the discussion that you have with people that maybe are what we’d call in an Arminian church, but that whole absence of covenantal history?

Pastor Tuuri: Yeah, I do. I think you’re right. Although I would say that the Roman Catholic Church kind of manifested kind of an incipient dispensationalism almost because there was this cutting off of the Old Testament. And I said last week, you know, that I didn’t touch on it real heavily, but they do talk about how there are not many decrees of election—one in the Old Testament, one in the New Testament. So they do touch there on an area of dispensationalism in brief.

But I think you’re right. I think that it is a fairly modern phenomena. I think though that as time goes on, we’ll have to deal with it less and less also because it’s dying the death. It is amazing. I did a web search this week on postmillennialism. Came up with a whole bunch of sites and there are—I mean several of them are just absolutely committed to, you know, killing dispensationalism and the rapture mentality. One of them has for wallpaper these great tombstones, rip, you know, rest in peace to the rapture and dispensationalism.

There’s there’s a lot of movement if the web pages are any indication of movement against that. And I think that as the millennium draws to a conclusion here, you’ll see more and more of that. But I think you’re right. I think that there is less of an ability to do that. There’s a new book out—what’s the name of that book, Chris?

Chris W.: “Wrongly Dividing the People of God.”

Pastor Tuuri: Yeah. That’s a new book that Bob Kitsm Miller kind of let us all know about. But I do think that’s right.

Q13:
Questioner (Howard L.): Well, I was just looking at World Magazine yesterday and there’s a big full page ad in there about a new book out about how Christ is about ready to return and it’s endorsed by Ralph Reed and the Christian Coalition in this. And you know there’s really, you know, it’s like people may have that understanding but they want to be safe and they still have a foot in both camps. And you I think you still see a lot of that though but you’re right, I think it is waning as millennial comes.

Pastor Tuuri: Just a quick observation and a question. I think that the Calvinist gets charged with pride because they tend to be more absolute in their stand with who God is. And I think that the staunch dogmatic approach to the doctrines of God tends to be offensive. And I think that the fact that the Calvinist, like you said, has one decree of election where the Armenian makes up many decrees—there’s this latitudinarian approach that the other side tends to take whereas the Calvinist takes a bottom line baseline: “This is it. You know, this is true.” And I think that may be part of it. I don’t know if you’ve seen that.

Pastor Tuuri: I think that’s right. I think that related to that is the whole Calvinist position which is essentially objective because it’s based upon the word of God. Yeah. You look for the evidences of the spirit subjectively in your life, but the role is indicated by the objective word of God—a standard outside of yourself. And the Arminian tends to be more speculative or subjective.

In this section in Numbers 12 and 13, it talks about how you’re not supposed to pry into the secret councils of God. And the commentaries on that, they talk about how the Arminian would rely and still does—people on, you know, subjective experiences, visions. Tremendous salvation experience becomes the basis for assurance. And we’ve seen that in our culture where if you don’t have a really great testimony, you know, a testimony is supposed to be your basis for your assurance. And the fathers looked at that subjectivism as a prying into the secret things of God and trying to observe things in a subjective way as opposed to the objective truth of God’s word.

So I think that’s right. It is offensive to man to have a standard outside of oneself and that standard then becomes the thesis and you are charged in them with pride.

Q14:
Questioner: Something that you just kind of touched on that I don’t think I heard you say in your sermon is the covenantal relationship of assurance to the covenant. Yeah. And where you know the scriptures talk about God being merciful to generations and you know the old Deuteronomy you know God alone chose your fathers out of all the kingdoms of the earth. And Peter said, you know, the promises to you and to your children. And yet there are warnings against, you know, if you think you stand, take heed lest you fall. God wasn’t pleased with some of our fathers.

So you have, you know, this assurance on the one hand that God is merciful generationally, but on the other hand, not to take too much comfort in that to be remiss in what you know, some of the things that you talked about. So that I wonder if you could maybe speak to the relationship of assurance to the covenant and how our children ought to be assured by us.

Pastor Tuuri: Well, you did a pretty good job. I think that you know I was going to say that first of all, you know, assurance is a covenantal fact because it has to do again with the eternal covenant, the everlasting covenant between the Father and the Son and the Spirit. And so the effects of assurance are worked out in the context of covenant truths.

But you’re thinking of a little different perspective on that in terms of the covenantal warnings. Is that what you mean?

Questioner: I’m just thinking, you know, we have children that are being raised in the faith. Yeah. It seems like, you know, when we look at—when I look at my life, you know, generally one of the things first things that I think about is my conversion. However, preceding that was a whole 20 years of being raised in the faith, having rejected it. So, it seems like you know I can look back beyond my conversion—before my conversion—and say God raised me in a covenant household. That gives me personally—I mean just speaking from a testimonial standpoint—that gives me personally great comfort. And I’m—I want to make sure that my children take comfort in the fact that you know they’re baptized members of the covenant of God. But at the same time I don’t want them to have the assurance that is the in you know. That’s the ticket. I want to make sure that their assurance is a matter of God working in their life and them seeing the spirit in their own life as well. I guess I’m not sure how to—I think that’s right.

Pastor Tuuri: That’s the tension the scriptures produce and that’s the tension you don’t want to get rid of. When I said that each Lord’s day when we usher in to give God worship and praise, we’re supposed to come forward in full assurance having our hearts sprinkled from an evil conscience in our bodies washed with pure water relating to our baptism. We come forward in the assurance of faith of our baptism, but it’s a baptism that has indeed cleansed our hearts from evil conscience. So, I mean, it has to do with the relationship of how we live our lives as well.

And so, that’s the tension built in. You don’t want to have children rely ultimately on the institutional church and their position in it for assurance. On the other hand, God gives us covenant signs of baptism and participation in the Lord’s meal as assurance. There’s no doubt that what the communion meal is given to assure the believers of his participation in the work of Christ and we don’t want to do anything to take that away. We want to encourage that in our children and then we want to help them—we want to observe in them and help them to observe themselves again these the outpouring of the spirit’s work in their life, the manifestation of it. So we want to—I think that tension exists and you just can’t do away with it.

Q15:
Questioner: I had an experience yesterday morning with the church I attended last and I was explaining to some of my friends why I’ve chosen to come here and start attending and some of the things I’ve been learning and also just my acquaintance with reformed doctrine and faith. And I find it really—what Chris asked you about the thirst for knowledge—I find it alarming in myself why I don’t [understand] the complacency I’m met with when I when I present some of these teachings to my friends.

I get animosity back. I get charges of me being dogmatic and arrogant. And I don’t I don’t know how to tactfully or diplomatically approach this because it’s just it I don’t know why they’re even—they’re so there’s just such a cement wall there and they’re not even willing to take. They see it as all peripheral issues. Nothing none of this needs to be taken seriously right now. You know, get out there and spend time with people and be in ministry, you know, whatever sense, formal or whatever.

And so it’s hard for me to know how to approach this because it makes me frustrated and I either want to withdraw completely and not even dialogue with him about it or I want to get severe and get harsh and say look, this your complacency is—it’s what’s going on here and how can the word of God not be something to delve into and search out. So I guess my question is how can you—at what point do you become really assertive and laid on the line and what point do you become passive and just let the Holy Spirit guide them. I don’t know. Does that make you understand my question?

Pastor Tuuri: Yeah, I probably don’t have an answer for you because it really, you know, what you’re asking for is a matter of how you approach a particular person or group of people and not knowing them, not knowing the background to the relationship, etc. Not knowing, you know, how you present yourself. It’s really difficult for me to be able to know.

I do think that there comes a time at which you do just want to declare this is the word of God. And if people don’t want to dialogue over that word, there’s really not much left to say about it.

But I don’t want to see—I just don’t know how to answer you because it could be you know different people are different ways. Some of us are perceived confrontationally even when we’re not trying to be confrontational because of the manner of our personality, is our way of interacting.

I was raised in the house with a couple of other brothers and we were very vocal and it, you know, that’s just the way we were and then the holidays were times that are very loud, boisterous, a lot of you know, but we were all working things through that way. Well, my wife was raised as basically an only child. She has a couple a brother and a sister but they’re many years older than her and to her I mean it’s completely antithetical to her experience. So when we interact like that she thinks, you know, that it’s a different deal than what we’re trying—that I’m trying to intend with my brothers.

I don’t know how you are. What you’ve got to do when you dialogue with people is try to understand how they’re perceiving you, how they’re hearing you, and try to frame your language, your demeanor, and your countenance. I teach my kids that the words we say are important, the tone we use is important, and the countenance—the scriptures have a lot to say about our countenance—is important as well. And we want to be in control of those things for maximum communication.

We’re supposed to try to minister grace. So if you’re trying to help another believer to see an element of God’s truth and minister grace, then you want to be very careful in terms of your speech, your tone, the relationship of how we live our lives as well. And so that’s the tension built in. You don’t want to have children rely ultimately on the institutional church and their position in it for assurance.

On the other hand, God gives us covenant signs of baptism and participation in the Lord’s meal as assurance. There’s no doubt but what the communion meal is given to assure the believers of his participation in the work of Christ and we don’t want to do anything to take that away. We want to encourage that in our children and then we want to help them—we want to observe in them and help them to observe themselves again these the outpouring of the spirit’s work in their life, the manifestation of it. So we want to—I think that tension exists and you just can’t do away with it.

I want you just to understand what I’m saying. I want you to wait until I’m done because I want you to really respect what I’m saying. Not just intellectually get it, but to give me the credence for having the opinion. So to remind myself, I keep little thing in my pocket. This was a heart made by one of my daughters when she was very little. And it’s not—doesn’t look real neat. But it was her first attempt in terms of doing something like this to show me love.

See, so I want to give her weight. Even though their opinions may be wrong, not properly stated, they may not have good countenance tone or speech. They’re, you know, I got to give them the doubt, benefit of the doubt. They’re trying to communicate in a godly way.