Exodus 19:16-20
AI-GENERATED SUMMARY
This sermon explores the second Advent “O Antiphon,” O Adonai (Lord), identifying Jesus as both the powerful Redeemer of the burning bush and the Lawgiver of Sinai1,2. Pastor Tuuri argues that Christ comes with a mighty arm to deliver His people from “Mad Max” style cultural and economic chaos, just as He delivered Israel from Egypt3. However, this redemption leads directly to the giving of the Law, which serves as the necessary standard or “coloring lines” for a sanctified life4,5. He refutes the idea that law and grace are opposed, asserting instead that the Law is the tool for exercising dominion and maintaining freedom6,7. The practical application calls believers to trust God’s power in difficult times while recommitting to the study and obedience of His commandments8.
SERMON TRANSCRIPT
Amen. Today’s sermon text is found in Exodus. I’ll start in chapter 19 at verse 16 and read through the first verse of chapter 21. So children, if you see the coloring page on the back of the handout today, it’s a picture of what we’re going to read about today. Moses going to Sinai to receive the law of God. Please stand for the reading of God’s word beginning at Exodus 19:16.
And then it came to pass on the third day in the morning that there were thunderings and lightnings and a thick cloud on the mountain. And the sound of the trumpet was very loud so that all the people who were in the camp trembled. And Moses brought the people out of the camp to meet with God. And they stood at the foot of the mountain. Now Mount Sinai was completely in smoke because the Lord descended upon it in fire. Its smoke ascended like the smoke of a furnace and the whole mountain quaked greatly. And when the blast of the trumpet sounded long and became louder and louder, Moses spoke and God answered him by voice.
Then the Lord came down upon Mount Sinai on the top of the mountain. And the Lord called Moses to the top of the mountain. And Moses went up. And the Lord said to Moses, “Go down and warn the people, lest they break through to gaze at the Lord, and many of them perish. Also, let the priests who come near the Lord consecrate themselves, lest the Lord break out against them.” But Moses said to the Lord, “The people cannot come up to Mount Sinai, for you warned us, saying, ‘Set bounds around the mountain and consecrate it.’”
And then the Lord said to him, “Away, get down, and then come up, you and Aaron, with you. But do not let the priests and the people break through to come up to the Lord, lest he break out against them.” So Moses went down to the people and spoke to them. And God spoke all these words, saying, “I am the Lord your God, who brought you out of the land of Egypt, out of the house of bondage. You shall have no other gods before me.
You shall not make for yourself a carved image, any likeness of anything that is in the heaven above, or that is in the earth beneath, or that is in the water under the earth. You shall not bow down to them, nor serve them. For I, the Lord your God, am a jealous God, visiting the iniquity of the fathers upon the children, to the third and fourth generations of those who hate me, but showing mercy to thousands, to those who love me and keep my commandments.
You shall not take the name of the Lord your God in vain, for the Lord will not hold him guiltless who takes his name in vain. Remember the Sabbath day to keep it holy. Six days you shall labor and do all your work, but the seventh day is the Sabbath of the Lord your God. In it you shall do no work, you nor your son, nor your daughter, nor your male servant, nor your female servant, nor your cattle, nor your stranger who is within your gates.
For in six days the Lord made the heavens and the earth, the sea and all that is in them and rested the seventh day. Therefore the Lord blessed the Sabbath day and hallowed it. Honor your father and your mother that your days may be long upon the land which the Lord your God is giving you. You shall not murder. You shall not commit adultery. You shall not steal. You shall not bear false witness against your neighbor.
You shall not covet your neighbor’s house. You shall not covet your neighbor’s wife, nor his male servant, nor his female servant, nor his ox, nor his donkey, nor anything that is your neighbor’s.” Now all the people witnessed the thunderings, the lightning flashes, the sound of the trumpet and of the mountain smoking. And when the people saw it, they trembled and stood afar off. Then they said to Moses, “You speak with us, and we will hear, but let not God speak with us, lest we die.” And Moses said to the people, “Do not fear, for God has come to test you, and that his fear may be before you, so that you may not sin.”
So the people stood afar off, but Moses drew near the thick darkness where God was. And then the Lord said to Moses, “Thus you shall say to the children of Israel, ‘You have seen that I have talked with you from heaven. You shall not make anything to be with me. Gods of silver or gods of gold, you shall not make for yourselves. An altar of earth you shall make for me. And you shall sacrifice on it your burnt offerings and your peace offerings and your sheep and your oxen. In every place where I record my name, I will come to you and I will bless you. And if you make me an altar of stone, you shall not build it of hewn stone. But if you use your tool on it, you have profaned it. Nor shall you go up by steps to my altar that your nakedness may not be exposed on it.’ Now these are the judgments which you shall set before them.”
Let’s pray. Lord God, we thank you for your word. We thank you for the appearance of your coming upon Mount Sinai that we just read about. We thank you, Lord God, that you are indeed Adonai, our Lord, who in ancient times did indeed give the law to your people. We thank you that you are our Lord, that we are your servants. Bless us now as we consider our Lord’s word to us. Transform us by it. In Jesus’ name we ask it. Amen.
Please be seated. Money is a trailing indicator. At least this is what I believe. Money is a trailing indicator. As you young people move into your adult lives, you don’t seek money. You seek a calling to express your calling from God in terms of vocation. And as you engage in that vocation and calling, money is an indicator, but a trailing indicator of your faithfulness. You work first and then you get paid.
We are in a mess. Steve Sykes had Abigail send a very excellent article from the Wall Street Journal on Mad Max and the meltdown. It was called “Mad Max and the Meltdown.” And Mad Max—you know, we sort of look around us in the financial world the last few weeks and it looks like a scene from Mad Max. How did all that happen? Look at all that carnage and wreckage. Look at all the 401k drops. Look at the markets. Look at people being laid off. You know, boom. In the last month, all this has happened.
What happened? It’s like a Mad Max scene. And the article is very interesting because it relates all of this to the holiday season and he says the meltdown in Mad Max—or he sets them in context. He begins the article by talking about how we’re entering that season where we all got to be careful to be politically correct and not let “Merry Christmas” slip out of our tongues, but rather “happy holidays.” And he relates these things together. I think in a very excellent and telling way—we are in an economic time of Mad Max, but money is a trailing indicator. The signs were clear. The signs were given long before the collapse on Wall Street.
What has happened to the American family, the Christian family for the last 30 years in this country? It has disintegrated. The kind of blessed families we see up here with all these children—I suppose visitors think we probably only have six or seven families here and each have about 15 or 20 kids. Sort of looks like that. Praise God for the daughters. Praise him for all their children. That’s a thing of the past. Nobody does that anymore. More with the wife at home, husband working, while the children are young. No, it’s all gone.
Marriage is gone. Well, not totally gone, but it’s been as devastated as the marketplace, right? And it happened long before the marketplace. Our constitution was shredded long after we shredded the scriptures and broke apart the Old and the New Testament. God’s law and God’s grace are two different dispensations of time.
Money is a trailing indicator. Now, get your attention. You like it when you get the big paycheck and when you don’t have enough money, you feel it. In the culture right now, God is getting our attention with yet another 2×4 laid up alongside the head. But what has happened in all of this? What’s happened is we’ve moved away from a consideration of the Lord God and the requirement to properly fear him as our text talked about today.
And as a result, right in the middle of that text—hope you caught it—as a result of that fear of God, we’re encouraged. It is our motivation, one of our central motivations, not to sin. So we live in difficult times. The author of this article on Mad Max talks about this relationship to Christmas. And let me read a little bit of this toward the end of the article. He first describes, using another man’s writings, what’s happened—all the devastation. And then he says this, after asking the question “like Mad Max, what happened?”:
He says, “What really went missing through the subprime mortgage years were the three Rs: responsibility, restraint, and remorse. They’re the balance that stabilizes two better-known Rs from the world of free markets: risk and reward.” So he’s saying the problem is not free market. That’s what people are saying is the problem. We can’t have free markets. No, he’s saying the people that have exercised freedom in the marketplace have gone wrong in these particular ways—risk and reward—and then in relationship to responsibility, restraint, and remorse.
So he then says: “Responsibility and restraint are moral sentiments. Remorse is a product of conscience. None of these grow on trees. Each must be learned, taught, passed down.” And so we come back to the disappearance of “Merry Christmas.” And he says at the end of the article, “The point for a healthy society of commerce and politics is not that religion saves, but that it keeps most of the players inside the chalk lines. We are erasing the chalk lines. Feel free. Banish Merry Christmas. Get ready for Mad Max.”
Yeah. You know, morality is not just a given in a culture. Things like restraint and responsibility—as he says—these don’t grow on trees. These must be cultivated. And what this culture has done for a number of decades now is to pull up the roots of all of this that produced the sort of moral fiber that made men have restraint and responsibility in the context of the marketplace. We have that no more.
Well, I shouldn’t say we have it. It’s like large families. We have some still. We’ve got a congregation of people here. But understand, you next generation of kids, this is what the culture is doing. The financial meltdown is an indication of everything else that’s gone wrong. And as this author of this Wall Street Journal editorial, I think correctly says, it’s all because we don’t say “Merry Christmas.” It’s all because the Christian base of our culture has been washed away and with it the fruits of a Christian morality. We’re not coloring within the chalk lines and in fact we’re erasing the lines.
Now we’re talking about the seven O antiphons, and today the second antiphon is O Adonai, who gives the law on Mount Sinai. So it’s about law. The first O antiphon was about wisdom. The second O antiphon is about law—the lawgiver that God is, Adonai, Lord.
You know, the choir was singing Yahweh earlier, and you know, you have these three big names for God in the Old Testament. You’ve got Elohim, strong one. You’ve got Yahweh, the covenant name of God. But you also have Lord, Adonai, in the Hebrew. And Adonai comes from the word meaning to rule. And these are the three big names.
Now, if you’re reading your King James version of the Bible and other versions, if you’ve got “LORD” in all capital letters, that’s Yahweh. And if you have “Lord” with a capital L and little “od,” that’s Adonai. And it’s used a bunch of times. So the O antiphon that we look at today is O Adonai, Lord. The central confession of the early church recorded in the book of Acts is “Jesus Christ is Lord.” So Lord—Adonai—means that he rules and has authority over us. We are his subjects. And a lord has a law. So the first two antiphons are in terms of Christ is our wisdom and Christ is our law. He’s our law giver.
Now, that’s talking about coloring lines and how to color within them. The law, the laws of God, are coloring lines. They tell us what we can do. They tell us we can’t go out here. We have to stay in here. But staying within here, we can do all kinds of stuff, right? We can color in different ways.
We sang a version of—I don’t remember which psalm it is now—”By Thy Strength.” And that’s the same psalm that we sang a different version of, I think maybe last week, which is much more solemn and sober. And I can’t remember the name of it now. What is it? Let’s see. Psalm 65. And the other version we sang is—yeah, is that what it is? “Forth from Thy Courts.” “Forth from Thy Courts. Thy sacred…” I’m not sure that’s what I was thinking of.
Well, anyway, we know different versions of psalms. The psalm is like the lines and the way we sing the psalms or set them to music is the coloring within the lines. In wisdom, we apply the specifics of the law to our existing situation. Okay? And that’s really what this author in this article is talking about—this Mad Max article.
There are men who have referred to this as “moral imagination.” The moral imagination. This is a phrase that comes from Edmund Burke. Edmund Burke wrote at the time of the Civil War, a man of letters, Christian man. And he is probably best known today because in politics you hear this quote all the time: “the only thing necessary for evil to triumph is for good men to do nothing.” This is Edmund Burke.
And Edmund Burke wrote about the collapse, the absence of the moral imagination, as he looked at what was going on in the French Revolution. And I talked about this a little bit last week—that what’s necessary to properly order our lives, wisdom is the proper ordering of our lives—is a cultivation of what Burke and then Christopher Dawson, and in the modern, in our particular generation Russell Kirk, who has brought back some of these ideas of Burke and Dawson, have referred to as cultivating the moral imagination.
We are imagebarers of God. We are not instinctual creatures. The world, the animals, insects, they’re instinctual. The spider doesn’t think, “I’m going to weave a really good-looking, cool web.” It does it instinctually. Now, it’s beautiful. And there’s a wisdom to the created order that is based upon them just doing what instinctually they’re supposed to do.
But God calls us to have a wisdom and an order that’s not like that, is it? You don’t get up and instinctively do everything you’re supposed to do. You have facts around you and these facts don’t just come and then line up in an instinctual response by you to what’s happening. No, all those facts and data—you, made in the image of God—process. You apply imagination to connect things up: to imagine what I might want to wear this morning, to imagine what church will be like, to imagine what I might do after church.
We make sense and order of the world around us not primarily through instinct but through the use of the God-given gift of imagination. Now, imagination is like any other God-given gift. You can’t decide, you know, whether you’re a human being or not. That’s what you are. And you can’t decide whether you’re going to have imagination or not. The point is imagination will be exercised because you are human.
And the question is: will your imagination—will your proper ordering of the world and delightfully making your own order and your own coloring marks within the context of the lines that other people color differently—is that imagination what Burke referred to as a moral imagination? Is it informed by literature, arts, the scriptures, the worship service, informed by things that build Christian morality into your imagination?
Do you imagine yourselves in this Christian sense? Do you put together the things of your world and analyze them, see them from the context of what the scriptures teach us? This is the moral imagination.
Now, maybe it’s good to talk about other kinds of imagination. In replacement of this, some have talked about the idyllic imagination. I-D-Y-L-L-I-C. In the French Revolution, at the beginning of it, there was an idyllic imagination. There was an attempt to see the world, understand it, act out on the context of it immediately, trying to achieve paradise through the throwing off of everything in the past, all the norms and mores of the past. I lived through this in the 60s.
It’s much of what our modern world has become was given to us by a rejection of my culture, my generation, of the moral imagination of the scriptures, the combination of wisdom and law. Sententia and Adonai, right? A rejection of all of that and instead wanting, you know, the hippie movement, the whole “we want paradise, we want it now,” and the way we’re going to accomplish it is by throwing off conventions of the past that we don’t understand. You see, doesn’t make sense to us. Who cares? The past—we don’t need it.
The idyllic imagination casts all that off and wants to create paradise now, not through the proper use of moral imagination. It moves away from that. It’s a different use of imagination. Probably President-elect Obama, you can look at it in this way. He’s casting an idyllic imagination before the country as opposed to the moral imagination. And the result will be that the lines that properly give civil rulers their restraints are being erased. And what’s happening is a collectivist mindset based on this idyllic imagination.
But there’s another imagination at work in our culture. And this is what T.S. Eliot referred to as the diabolic imagination. The idyllic imagination doesn’t last that long because it doesn’t work out. And men can either repent and go back to God’s moral, biblical imagination, or he embraces something even darker—the diabolic imagination. The diabolic imagination sees people, not as human beings, as imagebarers of God or fully human. They see other people simply as objects for their use.
The diabolic imagination gives rise to demonic activities. We could say to the sort of gross perversions that our culture is now awash in. When we saw two days ago the news report that a young man at college who was depressed was part of a group that you can watch things on videos—video each other webcam—and you’ve got a little community of people commenting on things that they see from each other.
And this young man announced he wanted to kill himself. “Okay, do it.” Everybody said they urged him on to go ahead. “Don’t be, you know, don’t just say you’re going to do it. Go ahead and do it.” They urged him on and he laid down in his bed with the webcam going and killed himself. That webcam was a live feed for 12 hours.
Now that’s the diabolic imagination at play. Not only has it thrown off restraints, it’s thrown off what were the vestiges of a Christian morality and a comprehending that we’re imagebarers of God, completely and to where this young man is just a matter of amusement. Why not? Because these same kids that are watching this on the internet have watched on various cathode ray tubes or liquid crystal displays all kinds of game sort of imagination images where they enter into this kind of thing—killing, raping, engaging in sexual fantasies of different sorts, making pretend that they’re a different sex than they are.
This is what our world has come to, and these are easy things to enter into for a culture. T.S. Eliot, now, in his culture all they had was books, and he said that the pleasure books you read that are easiest for you to pick up and read and get engrossed in are often times, he says based on his experience, the worst ones. They’re feeding this diabolic image of unrestrained passion and bloodlust and violence and perverted sexuality and seeing other people simply as objects to be manipulated for your pleasure. Why not? They become merely objects in a video game and you sort of see them that way.
So we are in the context of having thrown off the moral imagination and moved through a process of the idyllic imagination. The culture now in America is embracing the diabolic imagination. Why do we have Mad Max economics? That’s why. Our call as Christians is to understand and to cultivate once more in ourselves and particularly in the next generation this moral imagination—to see ourselves who God declares us to be, to see the coloring lines of God’s law, and then in wisdom color within those lines in the way that God has given us to do.
Now part of that is a concern for an appreciation of the past. Last Advent season I talked on Hoisty’s cross of life and Peter Leithart’s lectures on them at the ministerial conference in Moscow. And how remember that we have past and future and we have in and out, and what we want to do. We live in balance between the past and the future. We have to know when we lean to the past and when we lean to the future, but we never go totally to the past and we never go totally to the future.
The idyllic imagination wants all future and no past, and in fact it wants the future by cutting off the past. And God says, you know, the cross that Jesus hung on is a good imagery for us. What do we read? In our text today, God declares that he is the God of Abraham, Isaac, and Jacob. In the scriptures, he calls us to continuity. He calls us to remember our past. He calls us to, you know, to preference, to prejudice the past, even as we point toward the future.
Why are we looking at these dusty old songs, the seven O antiphons, that nobody’s ever heard of? What’s an antiphon? An antiphon is just response back and forth. And well, why? Well, because we understand that the church has handed down to us traditions, customs, music, song, confessions. In that great book by David Wells, he says the problem with evangelicalism is it threw off the confessions. It dumped them. “Who needs them? We’ll make up our own way of looking at things today. We don’t need the past.”
That’s why this church is tethered to historical confessions. We read events here that happened thousands of years ago. God says the way he’s going to prepare you to be a people pointed toward the future and transforming this world again—back out of this diabolic imagination to a proper moral, biblical imagination—the way he’s going to make you equipped for the future is to remind you of the past. Isn’t that interesting? It’s significant.
This Thursday we look back at the past. And some people say, “Well, who cares? Thanksgiving, you know, these traditions, we don’t know why we do them.” And they just throw them over. Don’t do that, young people. I know you’re tempted to. I know that it’s just sort of you don’t understand why we do things from the past, but believe me, it is vitally important—manners, mores, societal mores handed on through Christian culture. These things are significant, and when we cast them off, we end up with the sort of disintegration, the Mad Max effects in our families and in our culture, that now we see in the trailing indicator of money.
And now finally, you know, with money we get our attention. God gets our attention. So we’re looking at these antiphons because the church said they were important. Because from at least probably the sixth century or so, the church has been singing the seven O antiphons in the context of the days before Christmas.
Now, I’ve got a handout for you there, right? And as I said, on the back you’ve got that coloring picture for you kids that want to color. And boy, there’s lines, but lots of freedom to draw, to color within those lines. Don’t I know you don’t can’t stay within the lines, kids. Don’t worry. Stay within those big boundary lines at least. But this is the mountain that we just read about from Exodus 19 and 20.
So I’ve given you a handout there that has these seven O antiphons. What was it? O antiphon. Well, it would go like this. The leader would say, “O wisdom.” And then the people might say, “Who came from the mouth of the Most High.” And then the leader might say, “Reaching from end to end and ordering all things mightily and sweetly.” And the people would say, “Come and teach us the way of prudence.”
So it’s an antiphon. It’s responsorial, just like our responsive readings in the Psalms. It’s an antiphon. That’s all that big word means—back and forth like that. They’re the O antiphons. Why do we call them O antiphons? Because each of the seven terms begins with the exclamation “O.” O wisdom. O Adonai, right? And so it’s an exclamation. It tells us that the subject we’re going to speak of is incredibly important.
These are the characteristics. This is a picture of who Jesus is. And so this is a song. Think of it that way. Each of the seven verses talks about a different aspect of who Jesus is, right? You know, we sing that song, “Crown Him the Lord of Life.” And so each of those verses crowns him something different, another name for Jesus. This is the same kind of thing. It’s a hymn based upon the attributes of who Jesus is that we look forward to the coming of during Advent and who we now see—that we have increasing darkness in our land and we have a Mad Max reality.
And we ache for the wisdom and law of God to come to us to guide and direct us so that we may guide and direct this world. And so we sing these, or recite, talk about, think about these seven O antiphons, and we do sing them because “O Come, O Come Emanuel” has this same progression of the seven verses that recite these seven O antiphons. So it’s just a very old song, an old song that was done responsively, typically, and it’s O different names.
So for instance today we have O Lord, and so remember that’s Adonai in the Latin and ruler of the house of Israel. So see, he’s Lord and ruler. He’s Lord, and just to make sure we don’t miss the point, he rules over us. We’re part of the house of Israel—connection to the past again, right? Who appeared to Moses in the flame of the burning bush and gave him the law on Sinai.
The flame of the burning bush. So they conflate here in their description of Adonai two historical accounts: one, Moses at the burning bush, and the second, Moses at Sinai. But it’s really the same place. We don’t even know that, do we? I know that. I probably have heard that at some point in time, but until my reading through these texts, God appears to Moses in the burning bush in Horeb where Sinai was. And God tells Moses, you know, “Let you’re going to deliver my people and they’re going to come back here to this mountain”—same place. There’s a chapel of the burning bush at where they thought Mount Sinai was.
So these two events, the church wants us to think of these things together and brings us this witness through the ages. And then when we read our Bibles in the accounts of these two things, we think, “Oh, I didn’t know they were linked. I didn’t know it was the beginning of the redemption and the conclusion of the redemption that’s being talked about here. I didn’t realize that’s at the same location.”
Oh, and Jethro is in both places too. Jethro comes to him at the Sinai encampment. Moses is out there working for Jethro. You see? “Whoa. I see. Oh, yeah. I’m getting it now. There’s some continuity going on here.” And so the burning bush is somehow related to God’s appearance on Sinai. God will redeem his people from their trials and difficulties and troubles. And he will bring them out of that burning, the suffering, the tribulation they were in. And he will bring them on to Mount Sinai as a redeemed people and freed, but reminded that he is their Lord. That he gives them a law. He gives them coloring lines.
And so already a glance at this ancient text reminds us of something we don’t even know about our own Bibles. It’s this connection. Well, most of us—I don’t think know, probably some of you do—but this connection between the burning bush and Sinai. And so these are the events that are talked about: gave the law on Sinai. Come and redeem us. See who’s going to—at the burning bush he tells Moses, “I’m going to redeem them.”
I don’t know the imagery of the burning bush. It’s lots. It’s one of those things that we have that we can consider. In fact, we talked about this. In Acts it says that Moses considered this burning bush, turned aside, and after God saw that he had considered this strange thing, then God spoke to him. It wasn’t the voice that drew Moses’ attention. It was the appearance of God in the burning bush.
He’s fire. There’s a bush there and the bush is not consumed. It’s still there. This image of the burning bush, by the way, has been one that the historic church again has given us some connections to. Elements of the Scottish church use the burning bush as their symbol. The Huguenots are probably the first place in Reformed history where the burning bush becomes their symbol, and their motto was “burning but not consumed.”
And so the church has told us that, well, one thing that might be—this image is that God is telling them he’s going to bring them out of the furnace of affliction, right? Egypt is the furnace of affliction. Hard things, hard times going on in Egypt. You’re burning, but my people haven’t been consumed. God may be telling Moses in terms of his appearance in fire in the burning bush, “He’ll bring them out. He’ll redeem them.”
And so the early church sees these connections and sees that we can look around us. It’s Mad Max time. The economy is in flames. Our children struggle trying to keep order and sense in the world because the world has become a rejection of the moral imagination and the moral order of the soul that’s been overturned by the blizzard of the world, as Cohen says. Our children struggle to make meaning and purpose, and we haven’t done them a good thing by reminding them of—by failing to remind them of—these historic connections. We’ve tried, but there’s burning going on, there’s trouble, there’s trials, there’s difficulties for Christians in our world today.
People in California are saying, “How do we live as Christians? What are we going to do? These gays are attacking us. What’s happening here?” Trials and afflictions. And we need God to come to our culture to redeem us, to save us out of all of this. And to not just save us out of this, but so that we’d be his agent to transform this into the context of the world that it’s supposed to become redeemed. Redeem us with outstretched arm.
God’s outstretched arm is this arm of power. Throughout these recitations of the burning bush and the Sinai and this outstretched arm, we have this imagery that informs our moral imaginations to think of God in ways that is mighty and powerful and strong. It’s a fearful thing. You know, when you come to church, Adonai might be a useful thing to bring to your mind, because in Hebrews it says, “You haven’t come to an easier mountain. You’ve come to a harder mountain, a more terrifying mountain. When you come to church, you come into the presence of God in a further, stronger sense than they did on Sunday. That’s what it says in Hebrews 12, right? It’s more dangerous. Jesus is less dangerous now than he was when he appeared to Moses in the Old Testament. Now he’s more dangerous to us.
So this should inform us. These are elements of the power and might of God. Earthquake, the mountain quaking, the bush is on fire. The thunder and lightning starts happening and the trumpet sound. I don’t know where it comes from, but it gets louder and louder. And the people get very frightened and they don’t want to go up there. They’re so frightened of God and they say, “You speak to us, Moses.”
The Lord Jesus Christ, Adonai, mediates the presence of God to us. But never forget that it is a presence that is filled with awe, majesty. As we sing in our song “O Come, O Come Emanuel,” it’s a presence that should bring us to a holy fear, yes, a reverence and appreciation of the power that we’re looking at when we come before the presence of God, but a fearfulness of displeasing this God.
So the antiphon reminds us of the power, the might, the strength, the fearfulness of the God we serve. But then as it gets to the prayer and petition, that power and strength is talked about as the outstretched arm of God to redeem us from this. How can we see any changes in this Mad Max world? God’s power should bring us to proper humility, but it should then also bring us to a sense of power and authority within ourselves because God’s arm is not shortened, never has been, never will be. He is powerful to redeem us, to bring us out of the difficulties, to bring us out of the fiery furnace.
That’s the emphasis: Adonai is first and foremost the God who redeems us. And now in that redemption, he brings us to Sinai as he’s brought us out of Egypt. And there he gives us his law.
Now, I read a little more than just the Ten Commandments. I wanted to get the description of the power and might of God in there. I also wanted to get you to recognize that it goes right from the Ten Commandments to the description of the altar. And then I read the first verse of the next chapter because it’s the beginning of the case laws, the civil laws that tell civil governors and civil subjects what they should be like. The law binds everyone, not institutionally. We can look at it that way, but it’s talking about people.
There’s no government. There are governors. And governors sin. When they fail to govern on behalf of the Lord of all the created order, they sin. There’s—you know, elders—there’s specific elders, and if I sin, I sin. You see me—I sin. The elders didn’t sin. So the law comes to us as this guide and manifestation of what we’re to do, not just in the civil realm but in the worship realm. That’s you got the Ten Commandments, then you got the description of the altar, then you got the case laws—Exodus 21-23—then you have an extended section of laws concerning worship. More about worship than anything else. Goes about, civil law, worship, civil law, worship. And most of the law—when we talk about the law, if we think of the Ten Commandments, okay, it’s a summation—but most of the law, in terms of number of chapters and verses, is about worship.
So this law has that aspect to it. Brings us back to an understanding that the only way we can move into the future is to come together and obey God’s law in terms of worship and be reminded of what he has done and prepare us for the conquest that he calls us to as we go forth from this place.
So God comes to us in power and in might. He comes to us as the mighty one to redeem his people and to give his people a standard of conduct, a standard of conduct by which they’re to live. So on the cover of your order of worship there’s a symbol there for Adonai that is reminding of the fire, but another historic depiction of this is as the tablets of the law. You know, so all of these things are symbolic representations. But what we remember at O Adonai, O Adonai, is that Jesus Christ is Lord. And because he is Lord, he is powerful and mighty. We should fear disappointing him or sinning against him. And we should recognize that his power and might has come to redeem us.
And to a redeemed people, he brings this—he brings this law, this way of life.
I want to talk briefly here, specifically about the law. Not specifically, generally, I guess, about the law. When we were at a C team meeting a couple of weeks ago, we read through Psalm 119, eight verses at a time. There’s 22 sets of eight verses. And we’re reading verses 41 to 48. Listen to what the—about what the law—what it tells us about the law.
“Let Your mercies come also to me, O Lord, Your salvation according to Your word. So shall I have an answer to him who reproaches me, for I trust in Your word.”
Now Psalm 119 is all about the word but uses the term “law” and “commandments” as well. A knowledge of God’s law is what gives us an answer for the one who reproaches me. Verse 42, as I just read: “I’ll have an answer for him who reproaches me because I trust in Your word. Don’t trust in God’s word. Don’t know his law. Don’t have a proper answer for the one who reproaches you.”
Verse 43: “Take not the word of truth utterly out of my mouth, for I have hoped in Your…” —yes—the law is a source of hope to God’s people. David in Psalm 119 says that the law is his way of rebuking the reproaches of the enemies and his law is what brings him a sense of hope. If you need hope in your life, hope in the commandments and the ordinances of God.
Verse 44: “So shall I keep Your law continually forever and ever.”
So commandments linked directly to lawkeeping.
Verse 45: “I will walk at liberty for I seek Your precepts.”
The law isn’t opposed to liberty. The law is the law, as James calls it, the law of liberty. And no doubt he’s referring back, calls us back to remember Psalm 119:45: “I will walk at liberty because I seek Your precepts, because I love God’s law, his Torah, his Ten Commandments, his instruction unto me what to do with my life. As a result of that,” he says, “he will walk at liberty. Move away from the law of God, and you move toward bondage, not away from it.”
Verse 46: “I will speak of Your testimonies also before kings and will not be ashamed.”
Do we want to speak to civil governors and not be ashamed? Then keep God’s law. Understand God’s law. Meditate on his law. His law isn’t opposed to the conversion of men and nations. It is sinful to—it.
Verse 47: “I will delight myself in Your commandments which I love.”
You want to engender love in your life? Your commandments are to be what we love—God’s commandments.
Verse 48: “My hands also I will lift up to Your commandments which I love and I will meditate on Your statutes.”
The law of God, properly understood, increases our sense of personal piety and devotion to God. The law. The law—not some dry old, dusty thing. The law is the source of delight, the source of joy. It’s the source of answering our enemies. It’s the source of life itself, to walk in this redeemed state.
The Lord Jesus Christ, Adonai, tells us about his law: “Blessed are the undefiled in the way who walk in the law of the Lord.” That’s the way Psalm 119 opens. If you want to be blessed, walk in the law of the Lord. The Holy Spirit comes to you to bring, to cause you to walk in conformity to Jesus’s way. And Jesus’s way is the way of the law. “Blessed are the undefiled in the way who walk in the law of the Lord. Blessed are those who keep His testimonies, who seek Him with the whole heart. They also do no iniquity. They walk in His ways. You have commanded us to keep Your precepts diligently.”
I guess I’m supposed to drink. Probably not the right way.
So Psalm 119 begins by telling us to meditate on the law of God. And it closes in the same way. The last eight verses of Psalm 119: “Let my cry come before You, O Lord. Give me understanding according to Your word. Understanding of the situation around about us comes as we meditate on God’s word and law. That’s the gift of the law as well—understanding.
“Let my supplication come before You. Deliver me according to Your word.”
Again, deliverance is linked to the law or word of God.
“My lips shall utter praise for You. Teach me Your statutes.”
Again, the instruction in the law produces praise for Jesus.
“My tongue shall speak of Your word, for all Your commandments are righteousness.”
You want to speak of the word of God? Meditate on the commandments which are righteousness.
“Let Your hand become my help, for I have chosen Your precepts.”
If you don’t choose the law of God, his hand won’t become your help. In fact, it’ll be turned against you.
“I long for Your salvation, O Lord, and Your law is my delight.”
The source of delight again is not something getting away from the law. It’s the proper use of the law by the Holy Spirit.
“Let my soul live and it shall praise You. And let Your judgments help me. I have gone astray like a lost sheep. Seek Your servant for I do not forget Your commandments.”
We go away like lost sheep. And the basis for the prayers that God would get us back is because we have kept his commandments. You see? This is the same thing the beginning of the Psalter itself.
Psalm 1 says: “Blessed is the man who walks not in the counsel of the ungodly, the diabolic imagination, nor stands in the path of sinners, nor sits in the seat of the scornful. But his delight is in what? We’re supposed to delight in Jesus, right? We’re supposed to be delighting in God. His delight is in the law of the Lord. It is the Lord. It is Jesus, but it is his law that we are delighting in. And we’re not supposed to know it. We’re not supposed to obey it. We’re to delight in the law of the Lord.
“And in His law He meditates day and night. He shall be like a tree planted by the rivers of water that brings forth its fruit in its season whose leaf also shall not wither and whatever he does shall prosper.”
Is that what you want to be? Whatever you’re doing prosper. Well, it tells us here how that happens. It happens when we meditate on God’s law day and night and when we find delight in this law delivered at Sinai.
So God’s law—God’s law is a standard for us. In Matthew 5:19 our Savior says: “Whoever therefore breaks one of the least of these commandments and teaches men so shall be called least in the kingdom of heaven. But whoever does and teaches them, he shall be called great in the kingdom of heaven.”
A standard for our participation in the kingdom of heaven, the kingdom of Jesus who brings it from heaven to earth, is the law and obedience to the commandments.
Revelation 12:17 says it’s an evidence of our elect status: “And the dragon was enraged with the woman and he went to make war with the rest of her offspring, who keep the commandments of God and have the testimony of Jesus Christ.”
Now, there may be a reference there to all the New Testament saints, but they’re one body, right? So the way that we’re identified here in Revelation as elect is those who keep the testimony of Jesus, but also those who keep the commandments of God.
Revelation 14:12 says: “This is the standard of our patience: ‘Here is the patience of the saints: Here are those who keep the commandments of God and the faith of Jesus.’”
It’s the standard for patience is keeping again the commandments of God and the faith of Jesus.
The law is our confidence in approaching the throne of God in prayer. Proverbs 15:8 says: “The sacrifice of the wicked is an abomination to the Lord, but the prayer of the upright is his delight. The Lord is far from the wicked, but he hears the prayer of the righteous.”
You want answered prayers? Well, if you’re going to be getting answered prayers, if your prayers are to be a delight to God, it’s because you keep the law of God. He hears the prayers of the righteous.
Proverbs 28:9: “One who turns away his ear from hearing the law, even his prayer is an abomination.”
Turn away from the law and your prayer is an abomination.
John picks this up in 1 John 3:21-23: “Beloved, if our heart does not condemn us, we have confidence toward God and whatever we ask we receive from him because we keep his commandments and do those things that are pleasing in his sight.”
So because we keep the law, he says, then we’re going to have a clean heart and then we’re going to have answered prayers. He’s just really commenting on the text from Proverbs 28. “One who turns away his ear from hearing the law, his prayer is an abomination.”
And then he, John, goes on to say: “And this is his commandment, that we should believe on the name of his Son, Jesus Christ, and love one another as he gave us commandment.”
He sees the commandments summarized in loving God, believing in God, and loving our neighbor, the same way that the Old Testament, for instance in Leviticus, summarizes all the commandments of God by talking about loving our neighbor as ourselves.
In Ezekiel 36, the law is the standard for a Spirit-filled walk. “Then I will sprinkle clean water on you.”
This is talking about ultimately about the coming of Christ, in the new covenant era.
“I shall sprinkle clean water on you. You shall be clean. I will cleanse you from all your filthiness and from all your idols. I will give you a new heart and put a new spirit within you. I will take the heart of stone out of your flesh and give you a heart of flesh. I will put my Spirit within you, okay, so this is a Spirit-filled life that he’s talking about. And cause you to walk in My statutes. You will keep My judgments and do them.”
Are you a Spirit-filled Christian? You don’t evidence that through ecstatic utterances. You evidence that primarily through keeping the law of God, the commandments of God, the Ten Commandments, and their application to our life today. That’s how you know if you have a Spirit-filled walk or not.
The law is related to our love. John 15:10: “If you keep My commandments, you’ll abide in My love, just as I have kept My Father’s commandments and abide in His love.”
Jesus abides in the love of the Father by keeping the law. We’re to abide in the love of Jesus Christ. Our standard of love for Christ is whether or not we keep his commandments.
This is love. 2 John 6: “that we walk according to his commandments. This is love that we walk according to his law, according to his commandments.”
Horatio Bonar, in his book God’s Way of Holiness, put it this way: “Love goes to the law to learn the divine will and love delights in the law as the expression of that will.”
Love goes to the law for an expression of God’s will: “What does Jesus want me to do?” And then delights in that law. Love delights in that law as the expression of that divine will.
Romans 13:8-10, Paul says: “Your continuing obligation is to love one another.” And he defines love and he goes right through and cite several of the Ten Commandments there as the demonstration of what loving our neighbor is. It’s keeping the commandments.
Psalm 119:9-11 says: “The law is our means of sanctification. ‘How could a young man cleanse his way by taking heed according to Your word? With my whole heart I have sought You. Let me not wander from Your commandments, from Your laws. Your word I have hidden in my heart that I might not sin against You.’”
What he’s hiding in his heart is the commandments of God. So the standard, the key, the method of our sanctification is this law that Adonai brought us out of Egypt to keep, to walk in. Not that it might be our salvation, but to walk now as saved people.
Bonar again says this: “The relation of the law to him—that is to Christ—is the same as its relation to us who believe in his name. We’re united with Christ, right? So the relationship of Christ to the law, Bonar says, is the relationship that we should have to the law. His feelings toward the law ought to be our feelings toward the law. The law looks on us as it looks on Him. And we look at the law the way he looks at it, right?
We look at Jesus. What does he think? What’s his feelings toward the law? That’s what we want to be. We want to be like Jesus. What would Jesus do? Jesus, his love for his relationship to the law should be our relationship to the law. And the law’s relationship to us, completed now in Christ, is the same.
What did Jesus say? He says in Psalm 40:8—we read the heart of our Savior: “I delight to do Your will, O my God. Your law is within my heart.”
Jesus’s attitude was love and desire to keep the Father’s commandments. And that’s the way our desire and heart should be as well.
The law is to be our delight. To delight in the will of God as revealed in the commandments.
John 15:10-12: “If you keep My commandments, you will abide in My love. Just as I have kept My Father’s commandments and abide in His love. These things I have spoken to you that My joy may remain in you. That your joy may be full. This is My commandment that you love one another as I have loved you.”
Maintain my love. Keep your joy. May your joy increase through an appropriation of the law that reveals the will of our heavenly Father.
Psalm 119:14: “I have rejoiced in the way of Your testimonies as much as in all riches.”
Verse 16: “I will delight myself in Your statutes. I will not forget Your word.”
This is Jesus talking, first and foremost.
Verse 35: “Make me walk in the path of Your commandments, for I delight in it.”
In verse 47: “I will delight myself in Your commandments which I love. Which I love.”
Lord God says there are coloring lines, and these coloring lines—the law of God—were to apply in wisdom. And we’re to look at those coloring lines and have not a dread of them, but a love for how they bring to us delight and joy, deliverance from enemies, wisdom and counsel in the sight of the nations, effectiveness in witnessing to civil magistrates. All of these things are tied to the Spirit-filled walk, the Jesus-filled walk, which is a delight in these commandments of God that he’s delivered to us.
O Adonai. O Lord, who brought that law to us, who redeemed us out of our trials and afflictions, brought us to the holy mountain, that you might give us this blessed possession. And in Scripture word, a law found now and fleshed out in 66 books of the Bible, that we may delight in that word. And as a result, have joy, have peace of mind, have not anxiety, but a sense of order in the context of our soul.
Again, this world, its diabolic and idyllic imaginations will overturn the order of your soul. But the order of your soul will be found as you appropriate the law of Jesus Christ. Delight in it. Consider it. Read it. Memorize it. Hide it in your heart. Rejoice in it. This is the mind of the Lord Jesus Christ. This is the heart of the Savior. And this is what the Spirit comes to us to bring us to a correct relationship to the revealed will of God.
Let’s pray. Father, we love Your law. Help us, Father, to understand it. Help us to keep it in our meditation. Help us to know Your word. Help us, Father, not to be formed by the sorts of diabolic imaginations that are presented to us over the television and over the computer every day, 24/7. Lord God, help us rather to cultivate in ourselves—rather, a sense of a moral imagination that understands the need for coloring lines and to color with wisdom and beauty in the context of the lives that Your law gives us.
Thank you for these wonderful things. In Jesus’ name we pray. Amen.
Show Full Transcript (50,343 characters)
Collapse Transcript
COMMUNION HOMILY
Please be seated. I mentioned this structure of Exodus where the text we read this morning in Exodus 20 giving of the law is then followed by the giving of in very short form laws relative to worship in the altar. And then after that we read the case laws in chapters 21 to 23 that are an expansion of the ten commandments and then after that we have the expansion of the very short section on worship and the altar expanded out then in most of the rest of the book of Exodus.
Now between those last two sections however—between the law of the covenant in 21-23, the ten commandments, ethical instructions for rulers and those rules, and then the laws of worship—we have chapter 24 inserted in there. Let me read this.
“Now he said to Moses, ‘Come up to the Lord, you and Aaron, and Nadab and Abihu and 70 of the elders of Israel and worship from afar. And Moses alone shall come near me—near the Lord, rather—but they shall not come near, nor shall the people go up with him.’ So Moses came and told the people all the words of the Lord and all the judgments.
And all the people answered with one voice and said, ‘All the words which the Lord has said, we will do.’ And Moses wrote all the words of the Lord. And he rose early in the morning and built an altar at the foot of the mountain, 12 pillars according to the 12 tribes of Israel. Then he sent young men of the children of Israel who offered burnt offerings and sacrificed peace offerings of oxen to the Lord.
And Moses took half the blood and put it in basins and half the blood he sprinkled on the altar. And then he took the book of the covenant and read in the hearing of the people and they said, ‘All that the Lord has said we will do and be obedient’—second time the statement of obedience. And Moses then took the blood, sprinkled it on the people, and said, ‘This is the blood of the covenant which the Lord has made with you according to all these words.’ And then Moses went up also Aaron, Nadab, and Abihu, and 70 of the elders of Israel.
And they saw the God of Israel, and there was under his feet, as it were, a paved work of sapphire stones, and it was like the very heaven in its clarity. But of the nobles of the children of Israel, he did not lay his hand on them, rather. So they saw God and they ate and drank. And then the Lord said to Moses, ‘Come up to me on the mountain and be here and I will give you tablets of stone and the law and commandments which I have written that you may teach them.’ So Moses arose with his assistants Joshua and Moses—or Joshua and Moses then—went up to the mountain of God.”
So in between the case laws and the detailed laws of the laws of sacrifice, we have covenant ratification going on where God announces that there’s covenant people. The blood of the covenant is applied to them and their response to that is “all that the Lord has said we will do. We’ll keep these laws.” Of course, not perfectly. The law is a way or a standard not to be kept as a way of salvation, but rather to a saved people.
They’ve been saved through the application of blood. And their response to that is a desire to keep the law of God. And in that context, then the elders of Israel go with Moses up toward the mountain and the elders representing the people eat and drink with God. So eating and drinking is what we’re going to do here in a moment. And now all of God’s people come together—not just the elders representing the people as in the text before us, but now this side of the cross—all of us come together into the very throne room of heaven that was described for us in the text and we eat and drink a meal with the Lord.
Now eating and drinking in this way, informed by this text before us, means that the ones who are eating and drinking are those who have had the blood sprinkled upon them, right? The cleansing waters of baptism indicating the shed blood of Jesus Christ for his people, the atonement of our sins. And our response to the work of the savior is one of obedience and lordship. Salvation is pictured for us here.
The central confession of the church is “Jesus Christ is Lord. His blood atoned for all my sins.” But I in response to that say, like these holy people did not once but twice, that we will do what he has commanded us to do both in terms of civil statutes and in terms of informing our worship. As we come to the table we have this great high privilege with help from the people of God in Exodus 24 of all of us going to heaven—going all the way up as it were—eating and drinking a meal with God. But the reminder to us that’s gospel: the response to that gospel is that we should be like these people of old who said indeed, “All that he has commanded us to do, we will do.”
The gospel accounts tell us that the Lord Jesus took bread and then he gave thanks. Let us give thanks.
Father, we do this week of thanksgiving. We thank you for this ritual given to us and we thank you that every week begins with thanksgiving to you for the wonderful work of the Lord Jesus Christ in our behalf, for your creation and sustenance. Lord God, we thank you for this bread. According to the precept and example of the Lord Jesus Christ, we thank you for this historic ritual of the church imbued with such meaning and imagination as it is given your scriptures and all the different food and drink occurrences in the scriptures.
We thank you for today, Lord God, reminding us that as we eat and drink with you, we do so as those who are committing ourselves once more to obey you this week. Thank you for this bread. Thank you that without your nourishment, without your grace, it would be impossible to do anything to please you. But thank you that because of these things, because of the work of our savior, we can believe as surely as we eat this bread and get physical sustenance from it that we can believe spiritually we receive sustenance at this meal to walk in obedience.
Thank you for these wonderful truths. In Jesus name we pray. Amen.
Q&A SESSION
# Q&A Session Transcript
## Reformation Covenant Church – Pastor Dennis Tuuri
—
**Q1:** Aaron K.
You made reference to the Edmund Burke quote, “The only way for evil men to triumph is for good men to do nothing.” Given that our country is probably going to radically change in the next few years, what do you recommend we do?
**Pastor Tuuri:**
Well, let me qualify that. I have a friend who sent me an email with a letter where somebody in South Africa was comparing America to South Africa in terms of how they did nothing, and because of America’s involvement, their country basically went to pot. And the person writing the article basically said that we have to do more than write a letter to our Congress.
First of all, the country radically changed decades ago. That was kind of one of my points. What we’re seeing in the economic situation or in the election of Barack Obama is further working out of that movement away from Christian America that began probably most radically in the 60s. For a long time, this country has not been formally Christian, and even the Christians that have populated America have largely been those that are lawless or antinomian.
So change happened a long time ago as it continues to work itself out. First of all, I don’t think it’s going to be quite as radical. I mean, there’s—don’t you think that it’s sort of like punk hairstyles or piercings or whatever it is? These things start out there, but then they get mainstreamed and they’re really pretty innocuous by the time they become mainstreamed.
Barack Obama has already appointed most of his significant cabinet members, and there’s no radicalism that is evident from what he’s doing. There’s simply the continuation of the course we’ve been on for 40, 50 years, say, starting with Eisenhower. So first of all, I don’t think it’ll be as radical a shift as you might think, because when you get in there, money is a restraint. The reality of foreign policy is a restraint. All kinds of things restrain you.
What we do is what we always do. As the country moves more toward what we might call a diabolic imagination, one thing you have to do is protect yourself against that. The culture becomes more and more a draw for the Christian to embrace and encourage diabolic imagination or idolic imagination—something other than a moral imagination with rootedness to the past and the structures that God has given to us.
We’ve always said that whatever we do, we build on the scaffolding of the past. If we’re going to have new confessions, great. But they’ve got to be built on the scaffolding of the Reformed confessions that came before. To prejudice too much the past is to fail to look at modern needs and apply these things. But to be all future without building on the scaffolding—that’s bad.
So first of all, you want to do the defensive sort of stuff: being part of the established order and norm of the church, of which this church is an expression. Secondly, you build that sense of who it is you are. You take the law of God and the wisdom of God and apply it in the order of your life, and then try to create increasingly order in the context of where you’re at.
It’s not pulling back from everything that’s here. It’s embracing what’s going on, but doing it in a perspective of trying to bring God’s order, his perspective, his wisdom and law to bear into those particular arenas. I know that’s a lot more abstract or loose than what you’re looking for, but I don’t know any other way to say it.
—
**Q1 Follow-up:** Aaron K.
Do you think that adopting a stance that it’s probably not going to be as radical as we think is maybe—I’m trying to think of a good word—resting on our laurels, so to speak? I think maybe there shouldn’t be something more vigilant. I mean, not going the direction of the radical right-wing crazies with guns everywhere. But do you think there’s something more active?
**Pastor Tuuri:**
You know, it’s very easy to destroy a house. You throw a piece of dynamite in there and it blows it sky high. You cannot create a house that quickly, right? So the destructive forces that are unleashed in the diabolic imagination tear the culture apart. It is not easy to recreate that culture. It doesn’t happen overnight.
The culture has pulled up the roots of everything that supported this structure. Our job is to lay deep roots in the word of God, in the worship of God, in the community of the church, and to try to have those roots grow into a sense of order and righteousness in our vocations, involvement in political action, etc. For different guys, it’s going to look like different things.
I’m astonished that there is not a consistent Christian political party that tries to take not just some sort of constitutional approach to things, but a Christian approach to things and articulate what the scriptures say about each of these issues. Some of you have to do that, but that won’t be most of us. So everybody does different things.
It’s the simple stuff: memorizing the scriptures, meditating on the word, trying to apply the first and second tablets of the law in terms of your worship, your daily devotion, your relationship to your friends, building godly families. Jeremiah 29—that’s where we’re at. Hey, it’s Babylon. So what? We have jobs to do. We have vocations to fulfill. We have households to order and create. We’ve got children. We’ve got a multigenerational perspective. We build new roots, grow new roots.
—
**Q2:** Dennis J.
Is the imagination metaphor you’re using similar to worldviews? Would that be an analogy to that?
**Pastor Tuuri:**
Yeah, but a worldview sounds fixed. The point of an imagination is that it’s dynamic. There was a great quote by Santayana—the philosopher. Let me see if I can find it real quick.
A worldview means we have sort of a fixed view by which we interpret the things around us. A worldview would be more like the law part of it, the coloring lines. But moral imagination is a way to take that worldview and apply it in a particular set of circumstances or as we build toward the future.
If you have a Christian worldview, you’re much more likely to have a moral imagination, right? There’s a fairly close correlation, but the imagination is the way you think through the implications of your worldview. The attempt to build a consistent view of the world through the lens of scripture and the mind of our Savior certainly is grist for this mill of the moral imagination.
Here’s the quote by Santayana: “Perceptions do not remain in the mind as would be suggested by the trite simile of the seal and the wax—passive and changeless, as it were, until we wear off their sharp edges and they fade. Rather, perceptions fall into the brain as seeds into a furrow or even as sparks into a keg of powder. Each image in turn gives birth to more images, sometimes slowly and subterraneously, sometimes when a passionate train is started with a sudden burst of fancy.”
That’s a pretty good way to put it. The idea is that these things are interpreting. We’re interpreting data around us, and what we do—we cannot avoid doing this. We don’t just sit on data; we analyze it, we think about it. Man is an imaginative creature. In our imaginations we take that sense perception and we analyze it. We don’t create realities out of thin air, but we then do things. We put it into worldviews. We act on the basis of those, and sometimes those things happen slowly and sometimes they happen fast—just like if you read a text from the Old Testament and the New Testament.
Take the burning bush and Moses. You read the text, a piece of data comes in there, and sometimes slowly and subconsciously you start to think of relationships between them. This is the work, I think, of the Holy Spirit bringing you to think about the world based on the word of God and then interpret it that way. I haven’t said that very well, but yeah, worldview is certainly part of it.
—
**Q3:** John S.
What would be some of the specific applications of God’s law that most delight your imagination as you see us rebuilding and kind of recreating the culture along God’s blueprint?
**Pastor Tuuri:**
Well, I guess I have to think about that. You know, clearing to begin with the Mad Max metaphor again—God is plowing up, we plant seeds. So in terms of the financial crisis right now, there are seeds to be planted. I think an editorial writer for the Wall Street Journal did a pretty good job of starting to plant some of those seeds.
One of the most important things about law—not a specific commandment, but the factuality of law—is that there are laws and there are consequences to actions, whether we do this or that. The law implies a need to be responsible before the law, and shirking of responsibility for one’s actions is really, in essence, a denial of law altogether.
In terms of our congregation specifically, applying the law would be this idea of bringing into our homes, developing again the sense of responsibility, the sense of thriftiness—not spending more than we make—the sense of this order that I’ve talked about before: we do labor first and then we have the bread first, and then we have the wine. We work and we make money, and then we can spend some of that for enjoyment, instead of reversing all of that or having no order to it whatsoever.
If we look at the existing economic problems we have, probably in the context of our homes, that’s one of the most important things we can do: apply the basic idea that the movement of God’s law is labor first and then enjoy. The movement of God’s law is thriftiness—save for the future. These are elements that are given to us as applications of the laws against theft.
How do you love your neighbor? Well, you don’t steal. How do you steal? You end up in covetousness. How do you know if you’re being covetous? Well, a lot of times it’s debt. The incurring of debt for a present, taking care of a need we have in the present rather than postponing gratification for the future—this is a denial of God’s law.
I know that I’m not—I don’t know. I mean, the whole point is we’ve got a couple hundred people here today, and there are elements of God’s law that are important for them. I don’t think that any of us can say this is the deal right now. The moral imagination has kind of a recognition of that. The Spirit of God is moving people in diverse ways.
It would never occur to me to have a prayer meeting for North Korea. It occurred to Esther a few months back, and she took it and did it. So there are applications that are very individualized here, and we bring those stresses that are important to us to the mix. We talk about them, but we don’t say that whatever my deal is, your deal is.
To me, one of the most important things I think I’m doing right now is this education fair in Oregon City to try to bring unity to the church and specifically unity that will speak to parents to get out of the schools that are giving them, at best, an idolic imagination cut off from the past, and at worst, a diabolic imagination. That’s very important work to me. It’s multigenerational. But that’s my gig. That’s my deal. It’s what God has laid on my heart. Other people have other deals. So I wouldn’t want to say one thing is the thing.
—
**Q4:** Questioner (thanking Pastor)
Thank you for the way in which you’ve connected the dots between where we find ourselves and how we got there. I appreciate that so much. It’s one of the things that is so refreshing about your messages and this church, because it’s something that in all my church life for the last 28 years or so—as I’ve grown in my appreciation of the Christian worldview—that was lacking where I worshiped before.
**Pastor Tuuri:**
Well, thank you for the encouragement. Thank you for it.
—
**Q5:** Same Questioner (follow-up)
I wanted to go back to Aaron’s question a little bit and your answer to that. I would agree that the economic reality is going to temper the ambitions of the new administration. But I think we’d be naive if we believed that would happen also to the anger and animosity toward God that will be manifested in this new regime. They do not like God in any way, and they’re going to install people—he’s already installed people in the cabinet—who are aggressive individuals, aggressive against Christian worldview. And so I think that we need to anticipate and work against, to the extent that we are able in our legislative efforts, to oppose the appointment of anti-God judges and all the rest that is going to manifest itself that way.
**Pastor Tuuri:**
Yeah. A couple of things. One—to take back what I just said—I think probably Obama won’t be hindered as much by the economic realities as most administrations would be. I think what they’re going to do is spend like crazy. I’ve heard advisers say that our debt can be increased to an annual debt of a trillion dollars a year, and this would not necessarily be bad for our economy. So I think Obama is going to have no hesitancy to spend in the way we would have seen in the past.
And if you want to look at it from one angle—as I said before—the 700 billion bailout prepared us for 2 trillion dollars of deficit spending if that’s what they have to do the next year to do what they want to do. So there are economic realities, but I think he’s going to try to ignore them, and that’ll create more difficulty on the economy long term.
And then secondly, hey, you’re right. I mean, but what he’s doing is primarily using Clintonistas, right? So we’re going back, and if we lived through the Clinton administration, we can expect to see more of the same, and then it matures. It gets stronger power. Clinton didn’t have the kind of idolic imagination and false hope that Obama has. And so Obama will be able to do more of what Clinton wanted to do. But we’re going to see more of that. I don’t think it’ll be a radical change from that, you know.
It’s a steady progression from what these people have been doing. So yeah, I think you’re right though that there certainly will be aggressiveness, and I don’t think that the financial restraint will be that great on them in the short term. What do I know though? Gosh, we don’t—none of us know what’s going to happen next year. The future never looks like a straight line projection from the present. Just doesn’t. God’s a lot more interesting than that.
—
**Q6:** Monty
Way back here. I’ve heard a number of people make comments about the possibility that Obama would not make it to the presidency because somebody would take an extreme action. Thinking back to what David did to the two who killed Saul—but what would your thoughts be on that? It seems to me like we’ve got a real delicate situation there where we may greatly regret some of the things we’re going to see happen. And yet he is God’s anointed at this time. And it does not seem to me like we are free to wish for such a thing.
**Pastor Tuuri:**
No, absolutely not. That would immediately crush—to use this phrase I’m using today—the idolic imagination and actually stir up and engender the diabolic imagination. You would see an increase of violence for quite some time. It would be a horrible thing to have happen for Obama to be assassinated. And he is our president, and we should be praying for him. We should be hoping and trusting that there will be people of the church of Jesus Christ who will bring God’s word to him in the context of his rule.
So yeah, I think that would be absolutely horrible. I’m also not sure it’s quite as likely as people say it is. The ability, you know—with the technological changes—the security arrangements of this country have developed incredibly. And usually people that want to do such a thing are fringe elements of a culture or society, and for them to elude the kind of security arrangements that we’re now capable of and are using might be difficult.
So I’m not sure it’s really all that likely. But I think, just like you think, it would be a horrible thing.
—
**Q6 Follow-up:** Monty
So then maybe I’m trying to draw too close a correlation, but in the past you’ve preached about producing rather than taking by force or violence. At the time I hadn’t thought about it, but given our current situation and kind of feeling like we’re on the weak side of things, it seems to me like even revolution falls into that category of taking by force. And what you’re saying today really brings it back: we need to be working on our own situation, working diligently to produce and to be useful, have a testimony, but definitely not to be seeking some kind of radical kind of—like how some of the followers of Christ wanted that radical revolution and he wouldn’t give it to them. And we’ve really got to deal with the same issues, I think, don’t we?
**Pastor Tuuri:**
Yeah, absolutely. Yeah, absolutely. We’re not revolutionaries. We’re builders. We’re not takers, right? So I completely agree with you on that. Thank you.
And C.S. Lewis said the danger comes from the right, because even as the left is revolutionary in its worldview and what it tries to pull off, he said eventually the guys with the guns—the right-wingers—will eventually rise up. So that it is kind of a dangerous time, depending on what he does. And we certainly want to use whatever influence we have in the context of our political groups or whatever to discourage revolution.
—
**Q7:** Katherine
Elder Tuuri, you mentioned Hebrews 12, and you were talking about the two mountains—the one we haven’t come to. And maybe I misunderstood you, but did you say that the second mountain is more terrifying than the first?
**Pastor Tuuri:**
Yes. And you want me to read it?
**Katherine:**
Yeah. Can you explain it?
**Pastor Tuuri:**
Hebrews 12:18 says: “You have not come to the mountain that may be touched, that burned with fire and blackness and darkness and tempest.” This is a reference to Sinai. “And the sound of a trumpet and the voice of words, that those who heard it begged that the word should not be spoken to them anymore.” That’s a reference back to the account we read today in Exodus about Mount Sinai.
“For they could not endure what was commanded. And if so much as a beast touches the mountain, it shall be stoned or shot through with an arrow. And so terrifying was the sight that Moses said, ‘I am exceedingly afraid and trembling.’”
So now what do we come to? “But you have come to Mount Zion, to the city of the living God. And I think this is primarily talking about covenantal worship—to the heavenly Jerusalem, to an innumerable company of angels, to the general assembly and church of the firstborn who are registered in heaven, to God the judge of all, to the spirits of just men made perfect, to Jesus the mediator of the new covenant, to the blood of sprinkling that speaks better things than that of Abel.”
So this is a description of New Testament worship on our mountain, right? Mount Zion instead of Mount Sinai. And now he goes on to say: “See that you do not refuse him who speaks. For if they did not escape, who refused him who spoke on earth, much more shall we not escape if we turn away from him who speaks from heaven, whose voice then shook the earth. But now he has promised, saying, ‘Yet once more, I shall shake not only the earth, but also heaven.’”
Now this “yet once more” indicates the removal of the things that are being shaken as of things that are made, that the things which cannot be shaken may remain. Therefore, since we are receiving a kingdom which cannot be shaken, let us have grace whereby we may serve God acceptably with reverence and godly fear. For our God is a consuming fire.
So he’s using the imagery of the fire of God on the mountain and then what mountain we worship on. And he says, look—back then God shook the earth. Now he’s shaking the heavens and the earth. Back then the voice spoke from earth. Now the call to worship and what happens in the context of worship is the voice coming from heaven. So there’s a greater terror and dread—a greater judgment that happens now contrasted with what happened back then.
And so Hebrews 12—that’s what its whole point is: the New Testament is a scarier worship service than the Old Testament was. Now I think partly this is referring to the coming judgment of AD 70, and that shaking. But still I think the shaking goes on today. So does that help?
**Katherine:**
Yes. Thank you.
—
**Closing:**
Okay. Anybody else? Let’s go have our meal then. 1:30.
Leave a comment