Deuteronomy 15:1-23
AI-GENERATED SUMMARY
Tuuri expounds on Deuteronomy 15:1–18 as the first half of Moses’ sermon on the Fourth Word (Sabbath), arguing that the Sabbath is not merely about cessation of labor but about “imaging God” by extending rest and redemption to others1,2. He posits that the “beating heart” of the Sabbath is compassion for the poor, manifest in the commands to release debts and bondservants every seven years, thereby preventing a permanent underclass3,4,5. The sermon warns that a “wicked eye” which refuses to lend because the year of release is near invites God’s judgment, citing Jeremiah 34 to show that Israel went into exile specifically for failing to proclaim this liberty6,7. Tuuri applies this to modern believers, calling them to practice a “sabbatical release” through acts of mercy, microlending, and debt relief, asserting that the Sabbath is fundamentally a “proclamation of release” and the gospel8,9.
SERMON TRANSCRIPT
Continuing in our series going through the ten commandments. Today we have our fourth sermon on the fourth commandment, the fourth word. And for our text we will be reading from Deuteronomy 15 beginning at verse one, reading through verse 23. Please stand for the reading of God’s word.
Deuteronomy 15. And this is the first half of Moses’ portion of Deuteronomy, his sermon on the fourth word, Deuteronomy 15.
These first few verses we’ve already preached on, but they are in the context. Verse 1: “At the end of every seven years, you shall grant a release of debts. And this is the form of the release. Every creditor who has lent anything to his neighbor shall release it. He shall not require it of his neighbor or his brother because it’s called the Lord’s release.
“Of a foreigner, you may require it, but you shall give up your claim to what is owed by your brother. Except when there may be no poor among you. For the Lord will greatly bless you in the land which the Lord your God is giving you to possess as an inheritance. Only if you carefully obey the voice of the Lord your God to observe with care all these commandments which I command you today.
“For the Lord your God will bless you just as he promised you. You shall lend to many nations, but you shall not borrow. You shall reign over many nations, but they shall not reign over you.
“If there is among you a poor man of your brethren, within any of the gates in your land which the Lord your God is giving you, you shall not harden your heart, nor shut your hand from your poor brother. But you shall open your hand wide to him and willingly lend him sufficient for his need, whatever he needs.
“Beware, lest there be a wicked thought in your heart, saying, ‘The seventh year, the year of release is at hand,’ and your eye be evil against your poor brother, and you give him nothing and he cry out to the Lord against you and it becomes sin among you. You shall surely give to him and your heart should not be grieved when you give to him because for this thing the Lord your God will bless you in all your works and in all to which you put your hand.
“For the poor will never cease from the land. Therefore I command you saying you shall open your hand wide to your brother to your poor and your needy in your land.
“If your brother, a Hebrew man or a Hebrew woman, is sold to you and serves you six years, then in the seventh year you shall let him go free from you. And when you send him away free from you, you shall not let him go away empty-handed. You shall supply him liberally from your flock, from your threshing floor, and from your wine press.
“From what the Lord has blessed you with, you shall give to him. You shall remember that you were a slave in the land of Egypt and the Lord your God redeemed you. Therefore, I command you this thing today.
“And if it happens that he says to you, ‘I will not go away from you because he loves you and your house since he prospers with you,’ then you shall take an awl and thrust it through his ear to the door, and he shall be your servant forever. Also to your female servant, you shall do likewise.
“It shall not seem hard to you when you send him away free from you, for he has been worth a double-hired servant in serving you six years. Then the Lord your God will bless you in all that you do.
“All the firstborn males that come from your herd and your flock, you shall sanctify to the Lord your God. You shall do no work with the firstborn of your herd, nor shear the firstborn of your flock. You and your household shall eat it before the Lord your God year by year in the place which the Lord chooses.
“But if there is a defect in it, if it is lame or blind or has any serious defect, you shall not sacrifice it to the Lord your God. You may eat it within your gates. The unclean and the clean person alike may eat it, as it were a gazelle or a deer. Only you shall not eat the blood. You shall pour it on the ground like water.
Let’s pray. Father, we thank you for your word. Help us, Lord God, to be attentive to it now. Help us to explain the many complicated details of the text in an easy way. Give me grace, Lord God, that my tongue would communicate truth and that your Holy Spirit would use our gathering today to transform us. Help us, Father, to understand deeper as a result of this text what our commitment to the Lord’s day, the Christian Sabbath entails.
In Jesus name we ask it. Amen. Please be seated.
I have my U2 tie on today. I told somebody earlier they had a song called “Beautiful Day.” And one of the lyrics is “after the flood all the colors come out.” Reference to the flood. I mentioned U2 here before recently, particularly the guitarist, who Bono refers to as the lead guitarist—long obedience in the same direction in terms of working with third world nations and trying to relieve hunger and poverty in the world.
I bring it up because that’s what our text really will help us to understand why a Christian would be so committed in the long term to the sort of work that this guitarist for U2 is committed to. You know, as I did this morning, I tend to refer to them as kind of Christians but left-leaning. Well, today’s text will lead us to discuss left and right. And we’ve said this before, but the left and the right wings politically—one stresses compassion and helping people. The other stresses justice. And both political parties aren’t humble before God. And so they don’t go about it in the right way.
So we may or may not agree with all the ways that U2 works in this area. But I think if we understand today’s text and what Moses has to say about the fourth word, we have to resonate with the desire.
Two years ago I preached during the Easter season from N.T. Wright’s book “Surprised by Hope.” Wonderful book simply restating the orthodox Christian position which came across as a surprise. The resurrection of the body. The fact that Jesus comes back here, heaven, if we think of it as something away from earth, is not our long-term dwelling place. Jesus returns and heaven and earth are merged in heaven. This is where we eternally exist in a renewed earth. And so this world has significance.
Tremendous book obvious sort of truths, but things that catch us by surprise because of the weird way the church has gone for the last couple hundred years.
I mentioned too my reaction to his application. Then his point is that what we do here is significant and I was amazed to read that he thought the most important thing we had to do was release third world debt and I thought in light of the abortion situation that was pretty goofy. But if we pay attention to today’s text we’ll understand why that significance again is a profound understanding of what the Christian Sabbath, the Lord’s day is all about.
So it’ll help us to understand—we may differ on the mechanism as we probably would. But the desire that N.T. Wright and U2 describe is something that must fill our hearts to be truly sabbatarian, whatever that word might mean.
As we see in Deuteronomy 5 in the recasting of the 10 words, a more modern application to what they’re going to do—the focal point while they’re in Exodus 20, the focal point in Deuteronomy 5, the center as I’ve laid it out in your handout today—is that thing about giving others rest. Sabbatarianism has stressed the need to take rest but not so much giving rest and not so much the idea of what we do in terms of debt bondage oppression and all that stuff. And that’s what this text is all about. And this is the first half of the sermon by Moses on the fourth word, so it’s very important to us.
It’s the only sermon we could say on the fourth commandment that we have. We have other places in scripture that kind of mix up the laws and do them in different ways, but this is an actual commentary on the fourth word. It’s quite important to us. And so this emphasis that we see here is quite important as well.
This text will also help us to see that there are vestiges of God’s law still in our legal system. We have, for instance, the provision for bankruptcy in our legal system, but Chapter 7 bankruptcy can only be filed every seven years. So it ties to this sabbatical release from debt—the bankruptcy system—and you know, that’s based on these texts. And this will help us to understand the significance of that as well when we may not originally.
One other thing I want to point out here, and I meant to bring this up at our congregational meeting in two weeks—we report back from Schemata. We’re considering changing our vision statement which drives our strategy map.
Currently it is: loving the triune God, transforming the fallen world.
And what we have tentatively approved is inserting “and our neighbor” after the triune God. Loving the triune God and our neighbor and transforming the fallen world. It isn’t quite as balanced. But the reason for that is that this text—and as I said, if we’re fourth commandment people in the midst of a culture that wants to dump it—then we have to be people who understand that at the heart of the fourth commandment as Moses talks about it here is compassion and helping others.
Now loving God includes the idea of loving our neighbor but it’s important that if we’re going to make sure we don’t become kind of lovers of God apart from neighbor, that we self-consciously message the idea of compassion and loving our neighbor in the vision statement for what we want our church to be like. And so this text today is sort of connected to that as well.
What I want to do then is I’ve got several structures and this can get—you know, I hope this doesn’t confuse you. But the purpose of looking at the structure of a text is to kind of help us give a little bit of focus to how God has structured things so we can understand it a little bit better. So it should aid our knowledge of the text to kind of meditate on it to look at it from several facets—this diamond of God’s word.
You know, it’s interesting if I was to take any little piece of something, anything in the world, and to take a scanning electron microscope to it, it looks beautiful and there’s interesting structures. And in a way it doesn’t make any difference where you cut the thing up—there’s these wonderful structures. And in God’s word, you have these incredible structures, macro structures, micro structures as well that are just plain beautiful because they reflect the character of God who is beauty and order and symmetry and focus and all that sort of stuff.
It’s a beautiful world and the Bible is a beautiful book. And when we look at these texts, it’s like looking at a jewel. There’s multiple perspectives. And what I’m giving you today in the handout or in the outline—most of it isn’t from me. I’ve done some modifications to the outlines suggested, but most of them are from other Bible commentaries. And this is now very standard operating procedure, looking at the chiastic structures or linear structures of a text, because people know that if you’re going to understand what it says, part of it is you got to kind of understand how God structured it and the matches that he puts in the context of the text.
So we’re going to do a little bit of that. If you look at the first sheet on page two of your handout, what I’ve got here is a structure involving the first half of this sermon. So now I don’t put in 21B about boiling a kid in its mother’s milk. That’s an introductory symbol to help you meditate on what follows. And then there’s two parts of this sermon.
And this first part is a unit. The second part, which we’ll talk about next week, deals with specific feasts—by the feast of Passover, feast of booths, triennial feasts. And so that’s a different deal going on. So it’s quite clear to most people that study the Bible and study this part of Deuteronomy that there’s two halves. And this is the first half of the sermon. And there is a beautiful structure to it.
As I read through the text, you probably noticed that you’ve got this sabbatical release from debts. And then you had the sabbatical release, the seven-year release of bond servants. Those kind of match up. And if we look over the overall structure of the text, we began by discussing tithes. And this first half of the sermon concludes by talking about offerings. Tithes and offerings. And these tithes and offerings are tied to the worship structure, right? Formal worship deals are going on before and after of the Lord’s day. And of course, that doesn’t surprise us. The Sabbath is a day of holy convocation.
And so it involves tithes and offerings. It involves structuring our worship the way those things tell us to structure it. But coming in from that formal structure of worship we see the kind of attitude, the sort of things that are supposed to flow out of proper worship. And what we have is a sabbatical release of debt. So in the seventh year, poor loans—not all loans, not business loans and that sort of stuff—but people who are disadvantaged and have had to borrow money, their debts are released.
You let go of it, you let them go free. And matching that, if the guy serves for you six years, in the sabbatical year he gets to go free. And in fact you have to liberally provide him with goods as he leaves. So these things are related.
Now when we look at that structure, then it takes us then to the center—God’s focus of this first half of the sermon, Moses’s focus, what is the purpose of the formal worship structure? It’s the beating heart of the first half of the sermon. And that’s about compassion to the poor. That’s the center.
Now, it’s kind of in the context of releasing loans, but it’s really a separate section there. It’s not, you know, so what we have at the beating heart of this first half of Moses sermon on the fourth word is that if we’re really sabbatarians, it will drive us to compassionate action toward others. And at the middle of that, that beating heart, then the middle of that is this discussion about not having a bad attitude and not developing an evil eye toward the poor.
It talks about the heart attitude that we have and it talks about what our hands are supposed to do in relationship to that heart attitude. So that structure you see helps us to take a long complicated text—as I read it you probably lost your place and what’s he saying? And oh, it’s long and complicated and what’s the focus? How can we keep it simple?
And one way you keep long pieces of text simple is to look at the way they’re laid out. God writes a song and he’s got a first verse and he’s got a matching last verse. And then he’s got a couple of inner verses. And the middle verse is sort of the heart of the thing that drives everything else and what’s supposed to happen as a result of the first and last verse.
And so when we look at it that way, it helps us to understand the text. And I believe that the beating heart of the center of this text is the idea of compassion.
So on that sheet I’m talking now about C on that outline: generosity to the poor. So now there’s qualifications. These are poor who are among you, right? “If there’s among you a poor man of your brethren.” So this isn’t, you know, this is a very specific. This isn’t really got to do with poverty in general. It’s people among you and who are of your brethren within your gates even. So this center section begins by really focusing on the fact that charity begins at home, so to speak.
It begins in the context of where you are. Now when we apply that in terms of a global village today, well we have to think about that a little bit. But the point is there’s very clearly designated a particular kind of poor person.
And notice by the way that this is talking about poor people. So when we talked about tithes, there were these specific name groups that were the emphasis, right? The stranger, he’s a foreigner coming into your land to be with you. Your widows and your fatherless. Those are the specific designations. Now, the emphasis is not those three groups. Now, as the text moves on, it’s talking about the poor generally.
Now, this word poor—you know, what does it mean? Well, it meant somebody that was really poor. It meant somebody that was day-to-day subsistence level poverty, having a hard time providing just for his basic needs. And we could, you know, we could talk for a long time about who are the poor today and who are the struggling.
So in our country, because our governmental systems have taken this compassion and applied legal structures to fulfill it, we have really not the sort of poverty that is being described here very much, if at all. Because everybody can get food stamps and they can get enough food. And all children are eligible to get health care and you know, section 8 housing and other vehicles providing for people.
You know, homelessness is a problem but not much of a one. And typically these are not poor who are acting in a godly fashion. Frequently there’s sloth involved. And we have to balance this compassion for the poor against what the scriptures clearly tell us in Proverbs that the slothful man is supposed to be hungry. Don’t feed him. And in 1 Timothy, you know, if a guy won’t work, he shouldn’t eat either.
So we’re not talking about people that don’t have enough food if they’re not willing to work. So there’s a qualification here that’s important for us. But we want to be very careful. If the heart of this is having this compassionate view toward the poor, we don’t want to so structure the definition of the poor so that we don’t have to be compassionate toward anybody, right?
So you know, and we have to say that really has it been compassionate to provide the sort of systems for taking care of the poor that the liberals have provided? Just like the conservatives provide a justice system that isn’t based on restitution or the death penalty, but rather prisons and as a result creates more problems. So the liberals, not being humble before God either, have applied compassion, but they’ve done it with governmental systems that haven’t produced the kind of freedom that’s described in the text in front of us.
So we have to be careful, but we don’t want to miss the big picture. And the big picture, what does it say? “You shall not harden your heart nor shut your hand from your poor brother.” There it is in a nutshell. Have an open heart. Have an open hand. If you can help people, you should have a desire to do it.
So there’s an attitude that’s described here at the center of this sermon on the fourth word. And there’s an attitude that results in a specific action. So once again, you know, we have commandments. And yet we have, you know, an attitude involved in the keeping of them that’s just as important as the keeping of the commandment itself.
So no hard hearts, no shutting your hand. And I’ll talk about this a little bit more later, but you know, this is Egypt stuff. Who hardened his heart against oppressed people? Pharaoh, right? So don’t be like Pharaoh. Don’t be like Egypt. And of course, that’s what happens to Israel later on. They’re like Egypt and Jesus has to flee from the promised land to go to Egypt as an oppressed person, right?
So you know, the warning here is pretty big and significant in terms of the big issues that are going on with the Ten Commandments. They’ve been delivered out of Egypt. And so that’s really kind of behind the whole thing—the story of the Exodus and the arrival in the land. And they’re supposed to reflect that. So and then it says “open your hand wide to him.” So don’t just open it wide and willingly lend him. You got to lend him money. But you’re supposed to do it willingly.
Now, notice here that it’s not about giving money away. Now, you can do that. Alms are fine to give to people. But what this is talking about are loans. And so, you know, we want to see that if the beating heart of the fourth word, the first section of the sermon, the first half is compassion, it’s compassion that directs people to loan poor people money, not to give them money.
It’s not a violation of compassion to loan people money. Okay? It’s okay to give money, but it’s not as if giving money is, you know, more compassionate than loaning money. What God says is you have a requirement. If you have the ability, if you’ve got money in your hand to loan, which more and more people won’t in this culture, but if you have money in your hand to loan, then you’re to loan it out to them.
Loaning produces a relationship that helps mature people. We’ve actually done this at our church. We had years ago, we had a guy, for instance, who was hard up. He was poor, couldn’t support his family. And so there was a poor loan arranged to him. And there were a couple of us—the church didn’t do it. We thought that this is personal. So we had a couple of men in our church who put together a sum of money and loaned it to this fellow.
And you know, he hated it. He didn’t like it. Because it came with an obvious implication that he should repay it back. And if you’ve loaned people money, you don’t want them to be slothful. And I’m not saying the guy was, but there was a pressure, right, to try to work—for him to get work. How are you doing on getting work? Are you looking for work full-time? There’s a deal that goes on, and that deal is part of this loan relationship. And there’s nothing wrong with that.
You see, in a culture where people are used to being perpetual servants coming out of Egypt, it’s very difficult for them to live like free men. And you can’t just do it by giving them money and freedom. They’re still going to act like slaves. So simple point: the compassion that’s driven here has to do with loans. And that’s what loans that are willingly led into.
And at the center of this text as well is this warning, this “beware” stuff. Don’t have a wicked thought in your heart. Don’t have an evil eye. But rather, you know, help.
Now, what does it say? If you have an evil eye toward your brother and you have a hard heart like Pharaoh, what is he going to do? He’s going to be like the Israelites in Egypt. He’s going to cry out to the Lord. And you know what happens after that in Egypt? They cry out to the Lord and God then brings all the judgments upon Egypt. Okay?
So God is giving a huge warning here. He’s giving—at the center of this text, he’s giving us a positive command to have compassion, to have wide open hearts, wide open hands. And he’s telling us at the same time, now look, be very careful that you do this because you don’t want to be like Egypt. You don’t want to be destroyed.
And as we’ll see in a few minutes, that’s just what happened to the Jews as they came out of Egypt. Eventually, they go into exile because of these verses. Because of these verses. That’s what Jeremiah says. So very important.
And then, additionally, it says that God will bless you in all your works. So God is kind of a carrot and stick sort of guy. When we look at God’s motivation, it’s carrot and stick, right? So he says, “Be real careful because I’m going to bring severe judgments if you harden your heart against people that need compassion.” And secondarily, he says, “Now, if you do open your heart and help them out, I’m going to bless you a ton.”
So it’s carrot and stick, stick and carrot, I guess. So that’s that’s sort of the heart of the text. And so an overall looking at kind of how the thing flows—whether it’s bringing people out of, you know, indentured servitude, that’s the sort of slavery that’s described here (it’s not chattel slavery)—he’s got money to pay off. He enters into a contractual period of service to you and your house. So it’s that kind of servitude.
On the one hand, you want to release him from that. Either, you know, he comes out free with money or he stays. But now he’s not an indentured servant really. He’s kind of a guy that loves to do what he’s doing. He’s doing his calling. So whether it’s that or whether it’s the loans, either way, the idea is that there’s a release from the loans you give people compassionately that ends in some kind of release and establishment of them. So you’re trying to establish them in their place.
And that’s that’s really the kind of heart of the message of Moses emphasis in the fourth word. And that’s why so now we see guys like N.T. Wright saying release of third world debts is important. Well, yeah, it is. Release of debts, biblically qualified, done in the right way, is absolutely critical. And God promises tremendous judgments against people that won’t do it. And he pronounces tremendous blessings.
So you know, we’ve said that keeping the Lord’s day is real high in the list of priorities. That’s right. But with that, based on this text, connected to cessation from work today and going to worship is developing an attitude that produces compassion toward the poor and makes use of specific vehicles and releases etc to help them mature, help them become independent.
So you know, it’s you know, if we see the great importance of the fourth word—and I do—and how its departure has led to many problems in our culture, here’s another one. You know, what we need to do is see the connection between, you know, a church like ours that emphasizes the day of the Lord, the Lord’s day. It must yield a compassionate heart and compassionate actions toward people that are poor.
One other thing about the poor thing: poor doesn’t just—now, here obviously the implication is economically poor. They can’t feed themselves or their families. But I would say that again this is a bit of a part for the whole. There are people that are oppressed in lots of ways, that are downtrodden in lots of ways, right?
So it’s just as much a proper application of this as we’ve talked about before to focus on babies that are going to be killed in the womb of their mom. It’s important to do that. It’s important to notice, for instance, the growing apparently sex slavery that goes on right here in Oregon, by girls sold into bondage. They’re being oppressed and they need to be released. And so, you know, while we’re talking about money primarily today, this word “poor” and “needy” is used in a broad sense in the Old Testament and can refer to other forms of difficulties or want that people have.
And we could apply it in all kinds of directions within our own community. We may not have people that are financially poor, but probably most, you know, many people in our congregation are oppressed or needy in some particular way. And having compassion toward each other, loving God and our neighbor, right, is what our vision should be. It’s what we should be seen to be to the outside world. And it’s something that should—that messaging should carry through in everything we talk about and evaluate here.
So it’s very far-reaching.
All right, let’s look at the next page of the outline. And here’s a little structure that commentators have noticed in the first three verses. Okay. So we’ve looked at the big jewel, the diamond in the whole, and kind of a big perspective on it. Now, we can look at a few smaller structures as well.
Now, this translation is Young’s Literal Translation because in most translations, the Hebrew word order is reversed at the end, and you can’t see the structure. But if you’re working in the Hebrew, the structure is rather obvious. And so I’ve given you Young’s Literal Translation. So it begins by talking about a release. It talks about the owner of a loan. And then it talks about not exacting it. And then it says “This is a release to Yahweh.” And then it says “Of a stranger you may exact.” And “that which is thine with thy brother thy hand release.”
So it begins and ends with “release”—the structure. And it talks about the owner of a loan and that which is yours. So the thing you’ve got to give to other people moving toward the center. And then we have this obvious device at the middle. And that’s a lot of times the way these structures are obvious to us is we got this word “exact.” And “exact” is at the beginning and after the center. So why does God say you don’t have to exact have a foreigner?
Well, part of it is because that’s what he wants us to know in terms of who he’s talking about. But he uses a particular word structure here that does this matching thing. Okay? And what does that do? It brings us into a focal point of the first three verses. In this particular facet of the diamond, this particular, you know, perspective on this text shows us that the first three verses, God builds in a focal point of what?
It’s a proclamation of Yahweh’s release. That’s at the center.
So what we’re talking about here, the Lord’s day, is a proclamation of Yahweh’s release. It’s a proclamation to us that we’ve been redeemed and released from sin and suffering is that proclamation, but it’s also a proclamation that rolls out into compassionate attitudes and actions toward those who are needy. Okay. So the center of the first three verses is the emphasis on the release of Yahweh. The release of Yahweh. Very important. And we’re going to look at a different release of Yahweh in a couple of minutes, but that’s important here.
The focal point really is: this is Yahweh’s release. This is the Lord’s day. This is the Sabbath. This is the time when God comes and proclaims release. And as a result, these things that you’re supposed to do are things you’re supposed to do.
Now, another emphasis here is this idea of the things that you own, right? So you—throughout this text, there’s references to the hand. And the hand, you know, you’ve got something in your hand. You give. You have a debt in your hand that he owes you. You release it. So you don’t hang on to this in the sabbatical year. And at the other hand, your hand is wide open to others. The hand is what’s big deal. So at the end of the service, you know, the benediction will be pronounced.
And those of you that have been here very long know that when you talk about the hand, it’s a big deal. And that’s what he does here over and over again. The hand, the hand, the hand, the hand, the hand. Why? Because what’s going on is God’s hand is a hand of power, might, authority and a hand of blessing in terms of benediction, right? And it can be a hand of judgment as well. We lay hands on people giving God’s power and authority to exercise the office of elder or deacon.
It’s the transference of power and authority. So the idea here is that again, this is a little broader than just “we’ve got money, great.” This is people, I think that you know—so we’ve tried to help identify the poor a little bit. Who’s the people that are required to give to the poor, to lend to them? It’s people who have a strong hand, a full hand. Probably it’s not most of us, okay?
I mean, it’s people that have the ability through power and influence, whether it’s monetary or not, to shape a culture. Hands shape things, right? And so the hand has to be full before you can open it wide to somebody else. We’ve talked about this before, but at the center of the Proverbs, there’s three sets of ten. The first set of ten words of the wise are about work. And at the center of the words of the wise in terms of work is being able to give to other people.
We should all aspire to be people with hands that are full enough that we can shape society through compassionate actions toward others. We should aspire to that. But it ain’t going to happen for all of us. And in America, it’s going to happen less and less. It’s the way it is. Our lifestyles will probably decline.
I was at a concert with Billy Joel and Elton John this last week with my daughters—I with Charity and Joanna. Lana couldn’t go because she was sick. And it was a good time with them. And Billy Joel sang “Allentown” and it’s a very sad song. And it was, you know, thirty years ago when he wrote it, you know, there was a decline in the manufacturing in America and this stuff. And we recovered. But now we have Allentown in spades, Allentown cubed.
I believe that we’re at a stage of economic reality with globalism, wage competition, and now the mistakes being made with governmental debt, etc. that I think it’s probably likely that Allentown will be our basic state for decades. So there’s a sorrowful line in it, you know. “It’s hard to keep a good man down, but I won’t be getting up today.” The singer of the song, who’s got no work, and you know that’s true of about twenty percent of our population right now that are trying to get work and can’t find it. And I think that’s going to be the way it’s going to be.
And I think what we’re going to have to see is a long slow degradation of cost of living or rather living standard. I could be wrong. But you know, you should desire to have a full hand. But realistically, most of you won’t have that. This is talking about people primarily who have the means to shape others with power, whether it’s accumulated wealth or political power, whatever it is.
Now the general principle is true, right? I mean, you’re supposed to have compassion on the poor too. And there’s a sense in which if we compare ourselves to, you know, third world countries, a lot of good Christians are using very small amounts of their capital through microlending projects to bring about the sort of thing—to have the compassionate loaning activities that are going on that this text talks about. And that’s very successful. And we should be doing it here at RCC.
We should be plugged into programs from other churches that are doing that. But the idea here of hand is powerful shapers of culture. And that’s an emphasis here as well. Your hand, the thing that you have which is yours. In other words, you don’t borrow money to lend it to a poor person. You know, it’s your—it’s your—it’s your. You have that power or ability. So the center is the release of Yahweh. And that’s what we can sort of see at the center of that one.
Now the next structure is verses 7 to 10 on that second, third page of the handout. And now here, Hebrew commentators have noticed that there is an emphasis here on the word “if” and “because.” You see, okay? We’re looking at 7-10. And you see at the last part of it “because, keel, for this thing the Lord your God will bless you.” I’m probably not saying that word. That’s a Hebrew word, and it’s the same Hebrew word that’s translated “if” at the beginning of the text. Okay? And it’s an unusual construction.
So God puts these little markers in there, these two Hebrew words used in unusual ways—the same Hebrew word rather—to mark off a unit here. And he kind of wants us to sort of again see this little facet of the diamond. And when we do that, it brings us to a particular center on this one, right? It brings us to the center of warning. “Beware.”
So here we saw warning was contained in the middle section of the whole—compassion to the poor, the overall structure. But here in this particular set of verses, there are these matching ups, these bookends that drive us to the center. And God wants us very much to realize that what we’re talking about here is the release of Yahweh. And because of that, you should be very careful. You should beware lest you have problems with this.
And notice the progression. “Beware lest there be a wicked thought in your heart, saying, ‘The seventh year, the year of release is at hand,’ and your eye be evil against your poor brother.” That’s real interesting to me. There’s a psychological development, I think, being talked about here. You know, you don’t want to loan money to the guy because it’s going to be released in the next year if he doesn’t pay it back. So you got kind of a—you don’t want to give him the money. And but to justify that, I think you end up thinking poorly of him. I mean, you don’t just want to say, “Well, I don’t want to obey God’s law and I don’t want to have compassion on the poor.” You start to look at him evil, with an evil eye.
That’s what we do, right? We don’t want to obey God’s word, and then we make up reasons why we don’t have to obey God’s word. And the reason here becomes one that’s completely destructive of culture. The very person you’re supposed to be compassionate and open to, you actually now have an evil eye against that person because your heart wasn’t opened. Your eye then became evil and wicked toward your neighbor.
So beware lest these bad things happen to you.
Now I mentioned the warnings here. And the warnings here are warnings that remind us of the hardening of Pharaoh. Pharaoh’s heart was hard, right? Let’s see. In Exodus 13:15, listen. “It came to pass when Pharaoh was stubborn about letting us go that the Lord killed all the firstborn in the land of Egypt, both the firstborn of man and the firstborn of beasts.”
Now, see, it’s interesting because we’re not going to really talk about the last section of this whole thing, but the last section is about the consecration of firstborn animals. Well, here we’ve got a little couple of verses. Pharaoh hardened his heart, wouldn’t let—wouldn’t have compassion on people to let them go even though they’d served him long and hard. And as a result, God kills him and kills all the firstborn. Okay?
And so related to the sabbatical release is these laws on the firstborn that are given to us. But the point here is that, you know, there’s a really important truth here that we had better make darn sure that we don’t miss. This isn’t some sort of interesting little aspect of the Sabbath. It’s key to it. That’s what Deuteronomy 5 says. That’s what this section of Moses sermon says. It’s absolutely central if we’re going to be properly sabbatarian. Not in a blue law sense, but it’s sabbatarian and applying the law of God and keeping the Sabbath, the Christian Sabbath, the Lord’s day.
This is central to it. And if we don’t do it—and remember this is the release of Yahweh—he will bring horrible judgments because then we’ll be Egyptians and not God’s people anymore. And that’s just what happens to them, right? In Jeremiah 34, here’s what God says.
And the deal is that, you know, before judgment’s coming—they’ve been in the land for a long time. They’ve sinned against Yahweh, and he’s going to send them into exile, right? And Jeremiah is one of the prophets that described this. And what they’re doing wrong according to Jeremiah is they’re not releasing their servants. Or they released them from their indentured servants and took them right back. So it’s not obeying Deuteronomy 15. That is the specific reason that Jeremiah gives for the exile. Okay.
Now, there are other texts that say it’s because they wouldn’t give the land rest. So the Sabbath is the reason for God’s horrific judgments, and their failure to release people sabbatically in terms of debt and servitude is also the reason.
Now listen to this. This is real interesting. Jeremiah 34—that’s the context. Jeremiah says, “Therefore, thus says the Lord, ye have not hearkened unto me in proclaiming liberty.” That’s on the liberty bell, right? “Proclaim” from Leviticus. But this is the idea. The release of Yahweh is proclaimed. To not enter into this compassionate attitude and actions toward the poor is to deny our liberty bell. Okay?
Well, he says, “Because you didn’t do this in proclaiming liberty, everyone to his brother and every man to his neighbor. Behold, I proclaim a liberty, a release.” Remember I said, “Remember, this is Yahweh’s release. I proclaim a release for you, sayeth the Lord. A release to the sword, to the pestilence, to the famine. And I will make you to be removed into all the kingdoms of the earth.
“And I will give the men that have transgressed my covenant, which have not performed the words of the covenant which they had made before me when they came out, I’ll give them this judgment.”
Now, that’s really interesting. It’s the same sort of thing expanded and magnified and multiplied that describes what happened to Pharaoh. And now we can be just like Pharaoh. And that’s what happened to the Jews when you don’t proclaim the release of Yahweh and follow it up with actions. He makes a release. He releases you to damnation, to destruction, to the sword, to pestilence, to going into exile, to debt to China, whatever it might be, right?
That’s what he does. And notice that he says that the reason for this is “they’ve transgressed my covenant.” Remember, we said that the Bible says the Sabbath is the covenant. That’s what it says. You don’t have covenant if you don’t have the Lord’s day. And here it says the covenant is the proclamation of release. It’s compassionate actions toward the truly needy and oppressed. You see the connection?
Well, maybe you saw it as two different issues before today, but what you should see today is these are absolute—it’s the same thing because the Sabbath, the interpretation of it by Moses, involves the sabbatical release, compassionate attitudes and actions toward people. Do you see?
So I hope you’re fearful of violating the Lord’s day. And I hope you’re also fearful of not having a properly compassionate heart, which leads to—if you have the power in your hand—compassionate actions toward others. And remember, it can be expressed in different ways.
I was thinking about this, that you know, really this sort of was for ourselves but also for others when we did the homeschool law. People were powerless. Homeschoolers were powerless before an oppressive legal system that wanted to take their kids. And God raised us up, people that believed in the Sabbath. And we weren’t thinking of it this way, but to bring release to a group that had no representation, who were oppressed. That’s what happened. So it goes a lot of different ways. But it begins here in terms of these economic realities.
So the center of this next little facet, then, is this idea of warning. They’re going to cry out to God, and when they cry out to God, bad things happen. That’s just what the Jews, the Israelites, did in Egypt. They cried out to God, and God then brought all the judgments upon Egypt. Okay.
Next one. Deuteronomy 15:1-11. This is another structure. And here there are really two structures going on. And the first center is verse 4: “except when there may be no poor among you.” So here he wants us to focus on the fact that what you do isn’t just some sort of rolling the stone up the hill and coming back down. There is a movement toward the elimination of poverty that can be accomplished through the sort of things, the sort of social justice legislation that God puts in place for us as individuals.
So it is effectual. There’s this connection between the elimination of the poor in a particular place where God’s laws are enforced that can actually come to pass. And not only is that true, but if you look at the outer edges of this little structure, at the bottom of this structure, it says that there’s a relationship to the nations. “You shall lend to many nations. You shall not borrow. You shall rather reign over many nations. They shall not reign over you.”
So dominion over the nations, which is something we talk about a lot, is tied to eliminating the kind of poverty that’s being described here in our towns, in our village, in our country. You see, those things go together. And so, again, the Sabbath is the proclamation of release. It’s the proclamation of the gospel of Christ. The world will be converted. But that conversion happens, at least in terms of this particular structure, in relationship to our compassion and our actions toward the release of the poor.
And then the next half of this 7-11, again here, is the warning text which we’ve talked about already. So from a couple of different perspectives—three perspectives now. The overall structure, the other little verses, and now the main section of this thing. Three different perspectives on this diamond. This “beware” jumps off the page at us. So tremendous warnings contrasted with tremendous blessings, right? Dominion over the nations and the removal of poverty.
All right. Then finally, the last section: the release of the indentured servant at the seventh year. And notice verse 12. So we’re looking now at Deuteronomy 15:12 to 18. That structure in your handout: “If your brother, a Hebrew man or a Hebrew woman.”
Now they weren’t called Hebrews anymore. Okay? They were now Israelites because they were, you know, Jacob had his name changed to Israel. These are the twelve tribes. They’re Israelites. Why does he say Hebrew? Because it’s an Egypt deal. In Egypt, you know, they weren’t Israelites yet. They were primarily looked at and described in the scriptures of that part of the Bible as Hebrews.
What does the word mean? We don’t know. It seems like it’s probably related to Abraham was called a Hebrew, and he was the descendant of Hebrew. So maybe there’s a connection there. But you know, there are these three names used for God’s people in the Old Testament: Hebrews, and then Israelites, and then Jews—shortened form of Judah—which becomes, you know, the summation as we move through the history of the Old Testament.
Three different names, three different emphases. And here God goes out of his way to use a different word than Israelite. He uses the word Hebrew because he wants us to think in terms again of Egypt.
And what happens here? Well, you’re supposed to supply them liberally. What didn’t you know what happened in the wilderness, or as God’s people rather moved away from Egypt—before they left? What did they do? They asked for gifts, and the Egyptians gifted them. And so there’s a relationship here between the Hebrews and Egypt. Who, when they come out, are properly paid, just like the indentured servant is given capitalized funds as he leaves indentured servitude. God’s people were capitalized through the gifts that the Egyptians gave to them as they came out of captivity.
And those gifts, by the way, became used in large part to fund worship. Right? So but clearly the analogy here is to Egypt and God’s people coming out of Egypt, and we have an obligation—not just to let people go, but to capitalize them. Indentured servants, when they’re done, you capitalize them. You don’t want them to go into debt again. You don’t want them to have subsistence living. You’re supposed to provide for them liberally, right? That’s what the text says.
And then the very heart of this is the next section, beginning at verse 15. “You shall remember that you were a slave in the land of Egypt and the Lord your God redeemed you. Therefore, I command you this thing today.”
Today. So the center is again: we’re imaging God. He did this for us. He blessed you by giving you this land. He’ll bless the work of your hands so that your hands can be full to bless others. We’re image bearers, and compassionate actions toward the disadvantaged is part of the image-bearing capacity that we have on the Lord’s day.
God comes close to us. His characteristics get fused into ours—his communicable attributes, we can say. And that means his heart and compassion for us is experienced in a deeper way every Lord’s day. And that should have the effect, if we really understand the grace that’s been given to us, to be gracious and compassionate to others. That’s at the center of this provision for the release of the servant.
And then finally, we have the discussion of the man who becomes a listener, a good listener. At the end, we have the wonderful image that I think people have primarily misunderstood. And what it says is that if the guy loves you and wants to continue to serve in your home, now you put a hole through his ear. You put an awl, and you put it through his ear to the door of the house, and he’s attached then to the house. Right?
Well, God’s people Israel come out of Pharaoh’s house and they become attached to God’s house as his servants. There’s nothing on here about wearing an earring, folks, or being feminine or a slave in a bad sense. Nothing at all. It’s just the reverse. The picture here, the imagery, is somebody who loves to serve the master of the house.
Every Lord’s day, we come to God’s house, and we should have our ears open to hear. You know, the Egyptian word for slave was “listener”—literally someone who could listen to the command of the master. So God’s brought us to his house and he’s washed us. He’s having a discussion with us now, and he’s going to have a meal with us here and send us on our way. And what he wants us to hear today in his house is that as his loving servants, we’re supposed to be like him. We’re to extend compassionate actions to others.
We’re supposed to be gracious toward them as he’s been gracious to us. We’re now the servants in God’s house. That’s not a bad thing. That’s a great thing. Where else would we be? We just read it earlier in the Psalm. I’d rather be close to God in the house of God than any other place. It’s a great place to be. And that’s the image here at the end of this text.
What we’re bringing people into as we are at compassionate actions to the poor is ultimately loving service in the house of God that isn’t a result of necessity anymore, but is voluntarily and freely entered into. That’s the description of who we are. We bear the image of the master. We’re those who listen to his word. And yeah, that word says place the Sabbath very high on your list of priorities. But that word tells us today that to really do that, you have to place high on your list of priorities compassionate actions toward others.
Praise God. We love him. And we know that the end result of loving the triune God is the transformation of culture. But we must continually remind ourselves that the love for God must flow into the necessary second commandment—the love of our neighbor—and particularly our neighbors who are needy in some particular fashion or way.
God brings us to his house. May the Lord God grant us to be gracious image-bearers of his in really grabbing ahold of what the Lord’s day is all about.
Let’s pray. Father, we do thank you so much for giving us salvation, for making us Lord God’s servants in your house, for opening our ear to hear your word. We thank you for the imagery of the Passover and the blood on the door. We thank you for the work of the firstborn, the Lord Jesus Christ, your only begotten son, without defect or blemish. Lord God, accept—
Show Full Transcript (50,426 characters)
Collapse Transcript
COMMUNION HOMILY
Haiti is a contemporary example of compassionate actions. But if we just restore Haiti back to what it was prior to the earthquake, we’ve done a great disservice to it because it shares an island with the Dominican Republic which is prosperous and completely different in terms of cultural social structures and the resulting poverty or lack of it on either side of the island.
We also have another opportunity to show compassionate actions a week from this coming Friday and we have a benefit concert here at RCC Friday evening to raise food and help for women and their children in some cases who are part of the Shepherd’s Door ministry of the Portland Rescue Mission. So we have these examples.
Now I mentioned that we have this wonderful picture of God making us servants in his house. The other picture I think which also applies to us of the work of Jesus Christ is the letting the servant go and providing for him liberally.
We read in verse 14, “You shall furnish him liberally out of thy flock, out of thy floor and out of thy wine press.” Floor means threshing floor and is a reference to grain. So we have there a picture of what we have—a picture here of the threshing floor, the wine press, and all of these things are made possible because of the death of the only begotten of the Father, the Lord Jesus Christ, who is pictured in that perfect firstborn animal at the end of our text. In today’s message in Leviticus where it talks about the firstborn of the herd, it literally refers to it as the son of the herd. And so the emphasis is on this word sonship again, and so it’s a picture of the Lord Jesus Christ.
So God brings us to this table every Lord’s day to remind us that he liberally gives to us based on the work of the son of the herd or the son of the flock. He gives to us liberally of his threshing floor and his wine press. He establishes us for well-being in the context of our world. It says that therewith the Lord God hath blessed thee. We come to the table and the cups specifically—a blessing thou shalt give unto him.
Thou shalt remember, memorialize that thou was a bondman in the land of Egypt, and the Lord thy God redeemed thee. The Lord thy God redeemed thee. Well, that’s what we have here. This is the memorialization, the commemoration of the greater Exodus—the thing that the Exodus was a poultry picture of. Ultimately, the coming of the Lord Jesus Christ, who would lead us out of sin and bondage and bring us into a place where he liberally provides us all that we need to live this life joyfully in his presence.
This table is a picture that the Lord God is gracious to us and may we also then be gracious to others by furnishing them as Doug H. prayed—the gospel, the ultimate picture of blessing, the ultimate food and drink, the ultimate source of blessing and strength for one’s life.
The Lord Jesus took bread and then prayed. Let’s pray. Lord God, we thank you for this bread. We thank you for providing us the delicious bread, a picture of the threshing floor, the Lord Jesus Christ going into the ground and being raised up with food for the world.
We pray Lord God that you would bless us with spiritual strength from on high, a knowledge, a deepseated knowledge of your compassion and love and grace to us through the ministry of the Lord Jesus Christ that we may minister to the greater love, the body of Jesus, his church. In his name we ask this. Amen.
Q&A SESSION
Q1
**Questioner:** David, could you clarify the prerequisites for extending monetary help to others? It sounds like you need to own your own home and have extra cash?
**Pastor Tuuri:** I’m positive I couldn’t get into specifics on that, but good question. Those are the kind of things that people need to think about individually and make decisions about in the context of their families.
I also didn’t want to take the pressure off from people. I mean, if you’re buying your own house, you know, you say, “Well, I don’t really have any money to give for 30 years.” Well, you got money to do this, that, or the other thing—to go to an Elton John concert, whatever it is. So you know, you have to sort of look at what you’re doing. Debt has become a way of life here.
The purpose of that comment was to not bring unnecessary guilt upon people who are sitting here in the context of a declining economy that will likely decline for another 10 or 20 years. There’s a good case to be made that the reason why people borrowed against their home value over the last five or 10 years wasn’t so much greed and wanting to live a profligate lifestyle. It was trying to maintain a lifestyle in light of declining wages due to globalization.
And so I think a lot of people’s cashing in their home equity had to do with maintaining a lifestyle. And now that home equity is gone, the wages are going to continue to decline. And so it’s going to get tighter and tighter, or Allentown will become every town. I don’t want to paint too bleak a picture.
So I wanted to, you know, not make people feel guilty. And I do think that the emphasis of the text is on people who are people of wealth and power in a culture of which we don’t have a lot in this church. This church particularly is not well-endowed. Right? I mean, we were talking about this in our elder meetings, but many churches that might be, you know, couple of times our size bring in five times our income. We’re primarily single-income families as opposed to most churches which are now primarily dual-income, and we don’t tend to have professionals. So I just wanted to kind of balance that out.
I think in general, though, there is a portion of your tithe that’s supposed to be used to help, you know, the fatherless, the widow, and the stranger. There is some money that could be used. I think it would be probably incumbent upon us to write an initiative for this particular year to try to hook into some microlending project that Imago Dei or some other group is doing. So I think that there are little things we can do with little amounts of money.
America is still quite affluent nationally, although that’s changing globally. We’re now a debtor nation to China, etc., in violation—or as a judgment that the text brings to us to mind. But I think there are small things we can do in our homes. And what we always want to keep in front of our children, particularly those of us that are raising kids like you are and I did, is this idea of compassion again toward people with needs. So I can’t give specifics, David, but it’s a good question to ask. And probably most of us can do small things.
—
Q2
**Dan:** When do you loan and when do you give?
**Pastor Tuuri:** Well, I think more often than not, you loan. Now maybe I’m wrong about that. Almsgiving is a perfectly appropriate thing to do, but a lot of times it doesn’t really accomplish the purposes of the loan with accountability, etc. So, you know, every case is different.
Almsgiving is a good thing. That’s commended by our Savior, etc. And maybe it’s just because the force of the application is on sabbatical release. But it does seem like in the Old Testament the primary method of caring for people who had less money was gleaning. It was work for less money. Another primary method were poor loans that we’re talking about today. Another method is almsgiving. And then another method is a portion of your tithe.
And I think gleaning is the big deal. And poor loans probably come next. And alms come after that. But each case is different.
—
Q3
**Doug H.:** First comment: as we were praying the Lord’s Prayer, it occurs to me “forgive us our debts.” Yeah. And how important that concept is in the Gospels. And of course the connection is to some of this release of debt. And so Sabbath and that whole circle of connections with the Sabbath then is a restoration of relationship—it seems so—compassion that way in terms of forgiveness of sin and right relationship.
The question I had was: given all your comments—this is related to believers, there are certain conditions for the release, it’s local, and so on—what is the connection with releasing third-world debt?
**Pastor Tuuri:** The connection is that we live now in a global village.
And third—you know, I guess what—there’s two things. One, when a Christian man, a leader such as N.T. Wright talks about the release of debt as a very high priority, it sounds foreign to our ears. But you know, this was important in terms of God’s legislation for the fourth word. And as I said, it’s emblematic of covenant keeping, and if you don’t do it, you’re not keeping covenants. That’s number one. Just generally, I think it’s a good thing to talk about.
Now, in terms of the specifics, I don’t really know enough about third-world debt to speak intelligently. But third-world debt, you know, I would imagine is typically the result of company structures that have been put in place to produce such debt and who are trying to bring people back to a position of independence. And sometimes what you have to do is to relieve that debt to accomplish that.
So, I think that, you know, globally the idea is to bring nations back or peoples back—one at a time or whatever it is—to a position of wholeness. And debt can have a long-term kind of slave mentality to the thing that never accomplishes that. So, you know, I’m not saying there’s a direct connection to relief from third-world debt, but I am saying that, you know, when we hear things like that, it should resonate with us in terms of what Moses said about the Lord’s day and about covenant keeping.
And for specific people involved in specific loans for specific purposes, it may have an actual literal application to relief of debt to a third-world corporation or company.
You know what I think—as I said before—where I think these things go wrong is that the liberals, like the conservatives, don’t do it humbly. And so, as you say, the limitations of locality—to know what’s going on—I think that’s part of the localness thing. The requirements that it be in the context not of a foreigner but of a brother. The requirement that we can infer that there not be sloth involved. All that stuff, you know, tends to get pushed aside and government programs replace this individual activity that guarantees some of those things are dealt with properly. So that’s the problem.
But the instinct—just as the criminal justice instinct of people is good on the conservative side, their method isn’t good. I think that the instinct to try to see relief of long-term debt is a good one. And part of that requirement would be, you know, bringing people into the context of the Christian faith. And that was what probably should be going on anyway. Does that make sense?
**Doug H.:** Yeah. I wanted to be a little bit of a—I wanted to use a little hook at the beginning to make you think I’m going liberal. Okay. So the practical application of the loaning and debts and all that—that would be a good discussion or maybe a men’s meeting discussion someday, like you know we used to have—but to try to maybe role-play or to think of examples and how—because that’s really where it hits the road.
And but I do think that it seems like Scripture—well, for one—do we loan money to for expendables and then never expect that to be paid back? In other words, if you loan money to somebody so they can buy food for that day, after that day is gone, that they have—that’s done nothing for them but feed them that day, which is important if they’re hungry. But to expect that back—it’s not going to happen. The likelihood of that happening is not there because you’ve given no ability to generate any new revenue.
Yeah. And so there’s a couple things that I saw in your Scripture passage that you referred to—with the Egyptians and the Israelites (or Hebrews, however you want to address them). But if I believe that if Egypt had sent them out—as they did, they provided them the gold and all kinds of stuff—but had done so cheerfully, yes, I think that Egypt actually would have been blessed for doing so.
Okay. So, and then the other thing is that when we give to people, it seems like it should be towards the end of them being able to sustain themselves and then in turn being able to do just like what Israelites should have done—is to bless the nations around them with what had been given to them. So these poor people that are established—that are able to develop their own incomes—and in Uganda it might be a goat so that it can milk it and sell the milk or whatever—those kind of things are being done. But in turn, ultimately the spirit of it should be that they in turn would want to help others, and that’s how the—you know, that gets passed on.
But anything short of that—it seems that’s where we come into a problem—when we get upset, especially in the end when we have bitterness towards those individuals, recognizing that we’re not going to get paid or they’ve taken that money and squandered it. And yet God says don’t do that. Don’t be upset that way. So that’s—I’ve been there. I know I think many of us have been. And so this is real stuff, and it’s good—applicably to our lives is important.
**Pastor Tuuri:** Yeah. Bono at some conference on third-world difficulty said, you know, if you—I don’t remember who first said it: “Give a man a fish and you feed him for a day. Teach him to fish, you feed him for a lifetime.” But Bono said, “Teach him to sell the extra fish he catches, and now you produce societal growth and blessing.” And he’s right.
I mean, so you know, I don’t want to—you know, this is set in the context of a proper market system that really provides most of all that stuff we’re talking about typically. And so, you know, I think that capitalization in terms of the servant being released is an important deal. And I think that some of the microlending projects that have gone on in the last 10 years—you know, we used to give money to the third world because of sermons like this, and it would go to some ruler who was stealing all the money from the aid organizations.
And so what they’re doing now—some of the microlending projects are attempts to loan people money, 20 bucks, so they can then in their little hut create something that they can sell to others and pay back that, and that money is used to loan to others. And so there’s a whole process of American Christians using small amounts of money through the loan mechanism to create not a dependency group but to create a market-driven group that can then be used to fund further market-driven answers to these things in the countries.
So, and if you just give them the money for subsistence or whatever it is, it doesn’t quite do all that. You know, you’re not really helping people. Well, unless you really help people, right? So I the last thing I would want is to walk away from this text and think it’s just about money. It’s not. It’s about helping people. And so, to help people, that’s why I think loans are pretty useful at times. It produces the ability to disciple people in a way that gifts don’t.
And so, you know, we could—I’ve talked about that. I’ve got sermons about this—but you know, when you’re dealing with people who end up in crisis, a lot of times there are spiritual problems. Sometimes there are intellectual problems, right? So you got to teach them how to read or teach them a skill or a craft. Sometimes there are demonical problems—they don’t know how to be a king and how to save and do good things with their culture. And then there are economic problems. So there are all kinds of aspects to the thing, and the church has the answer to all that stuff.
And when we work with people, you know, it’s got to be kind of multi-perspectival as opposed to just focusing in on the economic. But you know, God chooses the economic portion in our text today to really focus on the fact that we have to have compassion for people that are struggling. And that’s the big takeaway, I think, and that’s something that goes right through, right?
So, for instance, in our parish notes, several groups asked about a playground. So we want to have people here. We want to have a celebrating day, and we want to be compassionate to people who have a bunch of little kids here and try to take care of them. We don’t want to say, “Well, it’s your kids. You take care of them.” No, we want to have compassion and try to come up with a mechanism—potentially a playground—to minister to them.
And so, if you think of whatever we do here, I think that what we’re trying to do by changing the strategy map is to layer a compassioning factor in everything that we do. You know, we’ve talked about this in terms of the agape. We want to have rejoicing, food. We want women to cook great food if they like to do that, and we don’t want to burden other women. We want to be compassionate toward people that—it’s a real pain in the neck every time they cook, they burn something.
So, you know, there are—we got to, you know, there—it’s always a question of layering in several aspects. And one of the things that we want to self-consciously layer in is compassion. You know, you go to most churches and they’ve got compassion ministries all over the place. And whether they’re helping people much or not, I don’t know. But if you come to this church, I think people get the impression, “Well, you’ve got—” I remember a phone call years ago. Somebody said they were interested in the church. I said, “You going to come?” “Oh, no. You’re the Marines. I could never do that.”
Well, you know, partly that’s a compliment, but partly that’s a rebuke, because we want to have people come here to be ministered to, right? “Come to me, all you that are weary and heavy laden. I’ll give you rest.” And if we don’t message that somehow and if we don’t provide connections for people who struggle in mental ways, in vocational ways, in relationship ways, then somehow we’re not really applying what the Lord’s Day is supposed to be about in the way I think of it.
So that was rambling. Sorry for that. Your comments were great and on target.
—
Q4
**Peter:** So I was thinking about Genesis and Joseph with the—the Egyptians (or not the Israelites, but the Pharaoh puts him over charge of the whole land of Egypt). He taxes everybody one-fifth to prepare for the famine that’s about to come. When it comes, then he ends up selling the increase back to them until they have nothing left and they become indentured servants to Pharaoh. So I guess my question is: should he have loaned it or gave it to them because there were needs? So what would you have to say about that?
**Pastor Tuuri:** Oh, that’s too big a topic. Very quickly: you know, he’s dealing probably with a population of servitude that gave a lot more than that typically—is what some people say. And so what he’s trying to do is make them providential and saving for a time of difficulty.
Another interesting story in Joseph’s life, though, is you know, when his brothers then come to him to buy food because it’s famine, he gives them the food. But do you remember what else he does? He puts the money back—he has his servants put the money secretly back in their bags. Now it freaks him out, but in a way it’s kind of this liberality of establishing people graciously—from, you know, Joseph—that’s picturing the greater Joseph, who gives us the Lord’s Supper and gives us back our tithe in the Lord’s Supper and so is graciously in the same way kind of a picture of what our text is about.
Okay, let’s go have our meal.
Leave a comment