AI-GENERATED SUMMARY

Tuuri presents Deuteronomy 22:1–8 as the climax of Moses’ sermon on the Sixth Word (“You shall not murder”), arguing that the command to protect life requires positive acts of kindness and neighborliness rather than merely refraining from violence12. He analyzes four specific laws—restoring lost property, maintaining gender distinctions in clothing (interpreted as protecting women from combat), preserving mother birds, and building roof parapets—as mandates to actively preserve life and create safe environments for rejoicing2…. The sermon connects these laws to the Advent of Jesus, the ultimate Good Samaritan who seeks the lost and provides a place of safety and healing for His people35. Tuuri challenges the congregation to build a culture of life by putting away grudges, engaging in active love, and ensuring their homes and cities are places of safety and joy67.

SERMON TRANSCRIPT

Uh, every time I think of that song, we sing that song. I think of Bob Morgan. The old days, he was a member of our church a long time ago. I’m not sure what church he’s going to these days. I mention it because the Lord God gives gifts to his people and very frequently those gifts are ministered through other people. And Bob got us to start singing this song as a church many years ago. And his gift to us became his gift to you.

Yesterday we exchange gifts and that’s what we do in our lives. Today’s text is the concluding text for Moses’ portion of his sermon in Deuteronomy on the sixth commandment. Thou shalt not kill. It’s kind of the climax and it’s really about neighborliness. It’s about gifting each other with kindness and love, blessing and joy. The text is Deuteronomy 22:1-8. Please stand and be attentive to the reading of God’s command word to us.

Remember, this is the climax of what Moses has to say about the sixth commandment. Deuteronomy 22:1-8. You shall not see your brother’s ox or his ass or his sheep going astray and hide yourself from them. You shall certainly bring them back to your brother. And if your brother is not near you, or if you do not know him, then you shall bring it to your own house, and it shall remain with you until your brother seeks it.

Then you shall restore it to him. You shall do the same with his donkey, and so shall you do with his garment. With any lost thing of your brothers which he has lost, and you have found, you shall do likewise. You must not hide yourself. You shall not see your brother’s donkey or his ox fall down along the road and hide yourself from them. You shall surely help them, help him rather, lift them up again.

A woman shall not wear anything that pertains to a man. Nor shall a man put on a woman’s garment. For all who do so are an abomination to the Lord your God. If a bird’s nest happens to be before you along the way in any tree or on the ground with young ones or eggs, with the mother sitting on the young or on the eggs, you shall not take the mother with the young. You shall surely let the mother go and take the young for yourself that it may be well with you and that you may prolong your days.

When you build a new house, then you shall make a parapet for your roof that you may not bring guilt or bloodshed on your household if anything falls from it. Let’s pray. Lord God, we thank you for this text. We thank you for this wonderful season. Help us now to rejoice in one more aspect of the advent of our savior, what he comes to bring us and to make us into. Bless us, Lord God, the good gift of the knowledge of this word and transform us by your spirit through it.

In Jesus name we ask it. Amen. Please be seated. Flynn A. and I attended a U conference for city transformation churches that are involved in thinking through and planning for and trying to affect city transformation. And after that conference, I was thinking about these sermons on the sixth commandment and actually the rest of the sermons of course but these particularly and I thought about the implications of what they mean for us in terms of a mental model for the cities that we envision of the future.

You know we at this conference one of the speakers was from mission Houston and he talked a lot about what he tries to do is create proper mental models of a transformed city. I’m not so sure his models are all that good. I didn’t necessarily agree with all of them. There were different people presenting things and it didn’t seem like their mental models were much informed by at least what we’ve been looking at in Deuteronomy.

It reminded me of a book, Paris 1918, I think it was or 1919, about the Paris Peace Conference at Versailles and the big three—there was originally big five but then the big three—were the heads of France and England and America. Woodrow Wilson of course kind of creating the world of the future and what we have in terms of geopolitical realities today are largely result of that conference. That’s where Iraq as a country started was their decisions.

They basically took the whole world and rearranged nations and tried to give sovereignty to countries and all this stuff. And Woodrow had these 12 Woodrow Wilson had these 12 principles and the head of France didn’t like Wilson and he said, “Well, God only gave us ten commandments and Wilson gives us 12.” And then he said, “Woodrow Wilson’s a lot like Jesus.” He said, “I never understood what Jesus says. Whenever Wilson talks, I don’t understand what he’s saying either.”

Well, if all you do is read the Gospels, it is a little tough to figure out what Jesus is saying. It can be because really what Jesus is doing is he’s bringing to pass everything that’s been predicted and foreshadowed by the Old Testament. And you have to understand the rest of the Bible in order to understand the Gospels. At least you can get some stuff out of them, but an awful lot of it you really can’t understand without the whole scriptures.

Well, I think that what’s going on in city transformation these days are people are reading their gospels and that’s about it and envisioning the city and they have a mental model. But the mental model that we have for instance coming through the text of Moses sermon on the sixth commandment in chapter 19 the very first thing was if people murder somebody you have to execute them. Human life is that valuable to where you have to protect through the death penalty.

So the mental model I’ve got of Portland is executions going on so that murders will decrease. There’ll be very few murders when executions are carried out in accordance with the law of God. Now that’s quite a different mental model of how to transform major cities from what most of the city transformers are talking about today. It’s counterintuitive, but it’s what Jesus’s law says. It’s what his word says that we’re supposed to be doing. In Deuteronomy 20, you’ll remember that it’s about warfare and how cities are supposed to be called to unconditionally surrender to Jesus.

I’ve got a mental model of Oregon City and a mental model of Portland where the gospel is presented and the whole city eventually comes to willfully and willingly submit to service to the Lord Jesus Christ and his church. That’s that’s the mental model. We’re not happy with a city that just has a lot of good times rolling and people having a good time if they’re not serving Jesus. Are we? To me the mental model has to be informed by the scriptures and the scriptures tell me that cities are supposed to be cities that willingly submit themselves to Jesus Christ.

Deuteronomy 21 says that I’ve got a mental model informed by the scriptures of what a transformed Portland Oregon city looks like in terms of sexuality and even in the time of warfare and captured women war brides. Sexuality can only happen in the context of marriage where the women are honored. So sexuality, my vision, my mental model for the city based upon what Moses has taught us about the sixth commandment is that you know sexuality happens in the context of marriage.

And we talked about this last week both in my sermon last week and in the Christmas Eve service about the reversal of barrenness. And as this country has moved away from Jesus, what do we have now? We’ve got what seems like inevitably the state sanctioning homosexual and lesbian marriage, which by definition is sanctioning a relationship that is intentionally barren, the opposite of fruitfulness. So, my mental model for what it will look like when things are really good in Oregon City and Portland, includes this idea of sexuality in the context of marriage that chapter also talked about inheritance, right?

And how to divide your inheritance among your kids. My mental model of a transformed city doesn’t see a 35% or a 45% taxation on a man’s inheritance that he’s built up to give to his children after his death. Now, these are mental models of a transformed city that are informed by God’s word and God’s word rather in God’s world. And what I’m saying is we need Deuteronomy. We need these sermons. We need this perspective on what God’s word says about culture, about how to create a proper state and cities, transform them or we end up, you know, kind of transforming Portland just by affirming everything and everybody and completely misreading the gospel message.

Well, today we come to the climax of Moses sermons and we have one more aspect and in this one I think you know we probably have most people agreeing with to a certain extent. So we now come to common ground more or less. It’s interesting. There are four laws in this section. You remember that we just had well you may not but in the last chapter in chapter 21 we had four laws as well. We had a law about a man being found in the field who’s dead.

And now this one here starts with men or be men starts with beasts being found and the need to return them or even beasts being fallen down on the road and the need to help them up. So there’s kind of a similarity between this thing in Deuteronomy 22:1-4 and this first section of 21 men and women the war brides that I mentioned before where the second law in Deuteronomy 21 and the second law here in Deuteronomy 22:1-8 has to do with men and women in warfare again that’s interesting you know it seems like there’s some kind of connection going on that God wants us to think about it doesn’t look like it’s warfare but believe me it’ll be that when we get to it you’ll see it’s warfare going on not just transvestitism but and then there was this discussion of mothers and children and the inheritance thing in Deuteronomy 21 and then we get this kind of you know riddle text about if you find walking along if you’re going to take the eggs and young you can’t take the mother too so mother and children are sort of the subject and then at the end of 21 we saw a picture of Jesus’s redemption for us bodies being hung after they were killed Jesus is hung of course to be killed and then his body is removed in accordance with the end of chapter 21 before nightfall and in the end the last verse the very last verse of Moses sermon on the sixth word has to do with another high place another high structure it’s not a pole now built it’s a house now built but instead of death being the picture it’s now joy because that’s where you entertain is on this roof and you don’t want that joy marred by bloodshed so there’s kind of a connection between chapter 21 and then these four laws here, these four simple laws and there’s movement as I said we move from the atoning work of Christ into now the rejoicing aspect of the city that has its laws structured to be in proper submission to the Lord Jesus Christ.

So let’s look at these laws in some little bit of detail. First verses 1 to 4 there are laws about restoring property and so the idea is that you know whether it’s your neighbor’s beast or if it’s his clothing or whatever it is you find of somebody else’s because they’ve misplaced it. Property rights don’t stop. It’s still their property even though you found it. Even though they’re not in control of it and you have an obligation then to restore it back to them.

This is the law of God. Isn’t just a good idea? Well, you see, in a way, what has it got to do with the commandment not to murder anybody? Well, remember when we started this series that word murder isn’t murder. It’s not kill. It’s it’s a word that can be used to describe both murder and manslaughter. Unintentional harming of life. So here the unintentional losing of man’s life, his property, it must be restored to him.

So a proper application of the sixth commandment is to restore life back to people that they have misplaced somehow or they become separated from. And so the specifics here of this basic principle that we’re supposed to desire and be motivated and go out of our way to help people come to fuller life. The specific example is this idea of things being lost and found. So Calvin says this essentially is the law of kindness.

And this is where my outline even though it has the wrong date is about the advent of neighborliness. You’re supposed to be a good neighbor. You’re supposed to do unto others that you had them do unto you. You’re supposed to be the good Samaritan who sees somebody hurt and doesn’t go to the other side of the road because the guy was walking to Jericho and who knows what stories we might tell ourselves about that guy in the parable of the good Samaritan.

No, we see somebody in need. We try to help him. The law of kindness, the law of neighborliness, the good Samaritan law, we might call it the law of loving your neighbor as yourself and all in the context of enhancing his life. That’s what the sixth word is all about. So, the in this little concluding section It emphasizes at first doing good to other people by replacing their lost property. It’s a big deal to them.

May not be a big deal to you. Maybe their garment isn’t all that great or something and you found it and they’ve lost it, but it’s their garment. It’s part of their life. It’s part of their whatever for whatever reason, what equates out into who they are. People aren’t just people in isolation from things. Things are extensions of people. Property has that kind of significance in the scriptures. and it’s supposed to be restored.

We’re supposed to work at it. And if you know the example is one of the examples is well, if you don’t know whose it is, you got to take care of that donkey or that whatever it is that beast, you got to feed it. You got to house it. You got to go to some sacrificial work for the well-being of someone you don’t even know who he is. Perfect stranger. And in fact, it’s even worse for us. We could say do Exodus 23:4 and 5 in the Exodus laws that apply to the sixth word.

It says this, If you meet your enemy’s ox or his donkey going astray, you shall surely bring it back to him again. If you see the donkey of the one who hates you lying under its burden, and you would refrain from helping it, you shall surely help him with it. So, it’s the same thing. Restoration of property, helping somebody with the donkey that’s burdened. And now it’s not just a stranger in Exodus 23, it’s your enemy, someone that hates you.

Now, this is very significant. This means that our lives are supposed to be filled with compassion. Even toward people that hate us. Even if they lose their property. Ah, yeah. We got it now. They lost it. That’s mine. That’s that. Oh, good. His donkey’s falling down. I hate that guy anyway. And he’s on the road to Jericho. And he probably doesn’t love God. What’s he going to that city for? And who likes him anyway?

And he’s probably not a Christian. Let’s just let him suffer. No. The Bible says a proper application of the sixth word doesn’t end with you not killing somebody. It continues on to you helping people. Helping people, your neighbor. Obviously helping people you don’t even know who they are and helping people if you do know them that they hate you and they are your enemy. You’re supposed to be kind to them.

So this is this is what Jesus came for. This is what we celebrated yesterday is the incarnation, the advent of our savior. And when he comes, he does just that, doesn’t he? He dies for us who hated him. We’re supposed to be like Jesus. We’re supposed to have proper compassion in trying to help other people in the context of their difficulties. You know, the the rich young ruler that Jesus tells the good Samaritan thing to, he says, “Well, you know, Jesus says, “Yeah, you’re supposed to love your neighbor as yourself.” Well, who’s my neighbor?”

You know, we get into those kind of games. And Jesus tells the parable of the good Samaritan. And now, you have to be a little bit careful how you read the thing. Jesus isn’t telling him who your neighbor is. He’s des, you know, Jesus always does what he wants to do in these conversations. He’s hard to understand. stand because he doesn’t answer the sort of questions we want to ask. But what he says here is not who your neighbor is ahead of time.

He identifies the location of the one you’re supposed to be loving. The location is the guy who is hurt, who’s been, you know, beaten up by thieves and left to die alongside of the road. He describes a location and an event, not a person. That’s real helpful, isn’t it? It’s helpful for me if I got to prejudge who my neighbor is and who I’m going to love and who I’m not going to love. That’s one thing. But if God says, “No, don’t look at don’t think about all that.

Just think about when you see people who are in true need. Have compassion on them.” And that’s your neighbor. That’s loving your neighbor as yourself. That’s the proper fulfilling of the second half of the law of God. To love God with all your heart, soul, mind, and strength. And to love your neighbor as yourself. Your neighbor is somebody in your location, somebody you come across. And that’s what Jesus told the rich young ruler there.

Jesus said, says in Matthew 5:44, “I say to you, love your enemies, bless those who curse you, do good to those who hate you, and pray for those who spitefully use you and persecute you that you may be sons of your father in heaven. For he makes his son rise on the good and the bad.” So it’s and this is not new. You know, Jesus didn’t come to change or transform or push out the boundaries of the law.

This is just Exodus 23. Exodus 23, which is a parallel text to the one here in Deuteronomy, says the same thing. Somebody hates you, somebody who’s your enemy, do good to them. Return their lost property. Help them with the burdens that their animals may be suffering in the context of HB Clark in his excellent book, Biblical Law, which is a statute book. He takes all the laws of the Bible, and he was an Oregon state legislator years ago, and he created this book.

It’s statute law of all these case laws of the Bible. And he has a little bit of comments, but mostly it’s just statutes set up like a statute book. I wish we could, you know, get u 100 copies of that and give it to the legislators. They’re very expensive. The book has been out of print and there’s a hard there’s a paperback version, but it’s it’s still expensive, 25 bucks or so. But in any event, HB Clark and biblical law says this, “The doctrines of biblical law are not altogether satisfied when one merely refrains from injuring his neighbor, for the law requires the doing of good at all times.” And that’s what Moses is saying here in his position of the sixth commandment.

It’s a requirement of doing good. R.J. Rushdoony in his commentary on this the requirement of restoring lost property to people says this. He says simple theft means taking that which belongs to another. There are many other ways of depriving people of their properties such as by taxation, but an indirect means is to refuse neighborly watchfulness. To see a neighbor’s ox, cow, or horse go astray. and do nothing means that the stray animal may be injured or stolen.

It’s a form of theft. To see the property unprotected because it has been mislaid or in some other way lost and to do nothing is to help in its theft. So Rushdoony he says you know look you’ve got to help people find their lost goods and if you don’t have regard for their lost property it’s akin to or likened unto a form of theft. Now we don’t think of it that way. We’re not trying to use it our own purposes necessarily, but it’s important that we do it.

You know, Caitlyn Fahlen does just this. She actively applies this text whether she knows it or not. She goes down there to the lost and found we have downstairs and she takes pictures of whatever you might have misplaced or lost here. And then she puts them up on the Facebook page of Reformation Covenant Church. And those things are held here for 4 weeks. We’re trying our best to obey this law, you know, to say, “Well, you’ve lost things.” If we’re not going to do it at the church, We’re sure not going to be very motivated to do it outside the church.

Has to start here, right? So, this is a very simple law. It’s implications are large for creating a Christian community, but it’s very simple. It just says, put on a mental attitude of trying to help people, be neighborly, be good neighbors, watch out for one another on your block or in your area where you live here at the church. Watch out for each other. Watch out for things that been misplaced and get them back to people.

So, we want to do that. The easy to understand, but to obey requires a mental attitude of a desire to be neighborly. And that’s exactly what this law tells us ought to happen. We’re commanded not to withhold our help, not to hide ourselves from our neighbor. Right? Interesting. So, don’t withhold help. Don’t hide yourself from your neighbor. When the opportunity exists to do good, do it.

So that’s what this first commandment is about. Jesus came to seek and save that which was lost. Luke 19 tells us that the advent of Jesus was really to fulfill this particular verse in that way. He came to seek and to save that which is lost. That was us. We belong to the father and we wandered away. And Jesus came as the good Samaritan is the good person to seek and save that which is lost and we’ve been recovered and God wants us to have the same attitude that Jesus had.

Okay. Secondly, preserving the source of life, women in wartime. Okay. So, this is a little difficult verse. Deuteronomy 22:5, a woman shall not wear anything that pertains to a man, nor shall a man put on a woman’s garment. All who do so an abomination of the Lord your God. Now, clearly, you know, proper application of this is transvestitism. So whether they knew it or not, the Portland Rescue Mission appropriately.

I’m not sure they understood it. It appears that they didn’t, at least with their first press releases. But you know, there’s an event put on by a transvestite called Queer Christmas. And so about a month or so ago, they approached they’re smart. They approached Portland Rescue Mission. They wanted to have a benevolence component. They were going to collect coats when people came into this transvestite queer Christmas and then give the coats out to poor people.

And they wanted Portland Rescue Mission to be a sponsor of the event and then help with distributing the coats to poor people. Portland Rescue Mission says, “Well, may hurt some of our donors. May not they might not like us doing that.” And then later the idea came, well, maybe it’s it’s just a little late for us to consider this, too bad. But, they really missed an opportunity to kindly but firmly talk about the importance of a Christian culture and Christian sexuality.

But in any event, it’s appropriate to think of this text when we watch transvestites parading around in Portland. It’s an abomination to the Lord. We’re supposed to have distinction of the sexes. Now, it’s not appropriate to say, “Well, that means that you can’t wear, you know, jeans because men used to wear jeans.” All that stuff’s taking the thing in a direction isn’t really intended. But to deliberately dress like the opposite sex, that’s what is going on here.

This is against God’s word and it’s kind of a violation of life. But to fully understand this text, you got to understand a couple of words here. The word for man, okay, says a woman shall not wear anything that pertains to a man and a man can’t wear a woman’s clothes. The word man isn’t the normal word just for man. Man, it is the word for warrior guy. It’s a man with strength and power. It’s a man that you would use to describe somebody in the army.

Warrior guy. Okay. GI Joe and the word for dress the anything that pertains to a man in verse first half of the verse doesn’t mean clothes it means kit stuff a bunch of stuff that applies to a guy the word can be the kit that the priests use in the context of worship for instance all the accoutrements to worship are the stuff that pertains to a priest, okay and the word is also used in terms of military battle. So, a man’s kit is, you know, his pack, his gun, his grenade.

I don’t know what it is. David S. would know. There’s a whole, you know, set of stuff that warrior guy takes into battle. And what this verse, the first half of the verse prohibits is a woman taking that stuff on herself. And as I said, this kind of goes back to the idea of women in battle back in 21. But I think what’s going on is the woman is not supposed to engage in combat. This verse has been used for centuries by the Christian church to interposition itself between women and the civil government who would like to draft women to go and fight in military combat not support roles in the army.

That’s fine, but I’m front line sort of stuff. And this is the verse that churches have used in a long time wellestablished legal precedents because that’s what it’s about in the first sense. It’s about women not going into combat. And I think that what’s going on here is a protection of women, right? Women are the nurturers. And the next little verse about the mother and the eggs, the bird thing, you know, the mother is the nurturer.

She’s kind of like the future in a way. She can have more eggs. Women are the nurturing culture, part of the culture. They’re to be protected, not because they’re weaker, but because they have this lifegiving aspect both with giving birth and also nurturing birth in its earliest moments. Had a little Ella around lately, you know, late this granddaughter can’t do a thing. and mom’s real important in her life to nurture her.

I think that’s what’s going on here. It’s a prohibition against women in battle. But the bigger thing is that life has to be protected and nurtured. And to do that, women who are sources of life in the context of a culture should be protected so they don’t go into frontline combat. And the next verse actually does talk about the garb of a woman. It doesn’t talk about the word there. The next half of the verse, a man shall not put on a woman’s garment.

That actually means woman’s clothing. But the man here again is this word for warrior guy. And it seems like the warrior guy is trying to stay out of not get hurt by putting on women’s clothing. It seems like that to me. I’m not sure, but I think that may be what’s going on. And again, if men start doing that, then women are going to be seen as fair game in battle. And so you’re going to end up with women being killed.

So I think the idea here is to nurture life to add, you know, part of this conclusion this climactic conclusion of Moses’ sermon is the need to see women and their important role as bringers of life and nurture to young life and that they have an important aspect in our culture and they’re to be protected. Again, not because they’re weaker, but rather because they’re stronger and better at doing lifegiving aspect.

And so again, not just don’t murder, enhance life, protect it, create a good climate for it, And so that’s what I think is going on here. I think this too is related to glory, right? In the in the parallel text back in Deuteronomy 21 about the war bride, she put off her nails and her hair and her garments. And garments are glory. Elisha asks for the double portion of Elijah’s spirit. And he takes Elijah’s cloak upon himself.

A cloak is glory and power and authority. And so a woman’s cloak, her garment has to do with emblematically of the nurturing and life-giving aspect that God has called her to have in the context of the culture. So Jesus came as the conquering bridegroom to protect his bride. Right? That’s the same thing. The only reason why I’m up here instead of a woman is because I’m a representation of Christ ministering his word to you.

And you in corporate worship are a manifestation of the bride. That’s or the bride rather. I’m the br, you know, Jesus is the bridegroom. We’re all part of the bride. I’m part of the bride when we sing songs. That imagery is firmly established in the scriptures. And Jesus’s advent came so that he could do battle, not the church. he does battle to protect his bride. And then she does mopping up stuff, but he’s the one that put on the garments of the kit that only he could use to accomplish the salvation of the bride.

And so that’s I think behind this verse. Third verse, preserving the source of life, mothers and birth. And I’ve already mentioned this a little bit, but verses 6 and 7. If a bird’s nest happens to be before you, you know, as we go through Moses’ sermons, he has these kind of things, little pictures that would almost never happen in your life, but they’re to illustrate a point. And the point is, you don’t snuff out life by taking the mother and the birds.

And the point is that the mother will be able to have more eggs or little birdies. And yeah, the birds will eventually grow up, but the image is that the mother bird is the source of life and nurture and you’re to preserve that. You’re supposed to want that to continue. And so the law says you can’t take both of them. And it then tells specifically that you leave the mom. Abortion for the sake of the life of the mother when the mother’s life is endangered, truly endangered, so that having a baby would kill the mom.

This text has been used in Christian ethics courses to teach that yeah, you know, you if you have to take the young to save the life of the mother, that’s okay. Now, it’s almost never the case anymore. Praise God. But the idea is that you have this preexistent life going on and the mother can have more life, etc. And so, you preserve her life. You know, this is a little law, right, about little birds, but it’s an important law.

God says that he tells us, he says, “Aren’t five sparrows sold for two copper coins and not one of them is forgotten before God. But the very hairs of your head are all numbered. Do not fear, therefore, you are of more value than many sparrows.” When we read little laws like this about individual little birds, you know, God loves birds. That’s important. But he loves you more. And he wants you to know from the context of this to draw analogies to people.

You know, Paul said, “Well, does God care for oxen?” Relatively speaking, no. The oxen law about not bridling the ox when he’s treading out the grain Paul says for the purpose of application to the life of men and specifically to the life of preachers being paid for their labors. So we’re supposed to understand that while God loves birds he created them, he cares for them. beyond that we’re supposed to apply these things to the life of people.

And so again it means the importance of the protection of life by protecting mothers specifically. And it reminds us of the great value that God places upon each of us. God cares about every sparrow. He cares about every hair of every head and he certainly cares for you in the same way. Jesus comes to bring us blessing. He comes that we might live and that we might have and that this life might have priority.

Life has priority. So that’s the third law. The fourth law. The final one, the culminating law to the sixth word in his sermon on it is preserving life. from the accidental shedding of blood. And we’ve seen this, we saw this at the beginning when we looked at the very word for thou shalt not kill. It means not just don’t murder, it means be careful that human life isn’t extinguished. And so the same thing is talked about here in verse 8.

When you build a new house, you shall make a parapet for your roof that you may not bring guilt or bloodshed in your household if anyone falls from it. Okay, so now in Exodus. A parallel law to this is found in Exodus 21:33 and 34. And if a man opens a pit and if a man digs a pit and does not cover it, and an ox or a donkey falls into it, if the owner of the pit shall make it good, or rather the owner pit shall make it good, he’ll give money to their owner, but the dead animal shall be his.

So if you take these two laws together, whether it’s a pit or whether it’s a high place, we have obligations as owners of property to do things to them that might preserve life and not accidentally lead to the death of life or the death of one’s property in terms of animals. So that’s the basic idea then is that the sixth word is fulfilled when we’re taking when we’re careful to try to create situations in our home of safety.

Now but it’s but it’s not a pit here. It’s a roof. And in order to understand this, I think one of the things we’re supposed to think about and there are probably several directions for meditation right? When we have these kind of enigmatic laws that use specific things, it’s a new house, for instance. Why? Well, we’re not sure. But there’s all kinds of things going on. But one thing that’s going on is this is where people would entertain.

They would get together for Christmas or whatever it is, and they’d have a good time on top of the roof. Okay? That’s where this culture would entertain. And so, in our entertainments, we’re supposed to be careful that people don’t get hurt. So, you know, Angie and Steve are having a New Year’s Eve party and they got to think about, you know, trying to avoid things that would cause people to unnecessarily get hurt there at their house.

This is what we’re supposed to do. And as I said, if you kind of connect this up with the previous chapter at the end of 21, we had this structure that was built to hang a dead body on. And this really pictured the atoning work of Jesus. And the atoning work of Jesus pictured in that as well as the remember the neck of the heir was broken. At the first section of Deuteronomy 21, Jesus’s atoning work is given to us as Moses is moving to the conclusion of his sermon on the sixth commandment.

And now at the end of the commandment, the sermon on the commandment, atonement is no longer the real picture, but joy is the picture. Safe rejoicing together in community in people’s lives. And so we’re moved from a place where atonement is made to a place where rejoicing happens. And in the context of that rejoicing, we’re told, be careful that people don’t get hurt. be careful to preserve life. Think about the sixth commandment when you’re entertaining because Jesus comes to brings us to bring us joy in community.

So the great culmination of Moses sermon on the sixth word is joy and community on a rooftop made safe by the members of the community applying the principles of the sixth word. So, it’s kind of a neat deal, kind of a neat thing that it comes to its climax in rejoicing and God not wanting our rejoicing times to be turned into times of sorrow. Now, I want to we could end there, but I want to move on and deal one last time with one last uh set of verses.

And I’ve mentioned this before, but we did it very quickly. Rejoicing life in community culminates Moses’ sermon has another aspect to it that Leviticus chapter 19 talks about in verses 15 to 18. So open your Bibles up to Leviticus 19:15 to 18 and I want to just make a few brief points about this text as another application of the sixth commandment. Remember Leviticus 19 has all these 70 commandments that are kind of a commentary on the ten words and this these are the verses that specifically speak of enhancing life.

So let’s read it together. Verses 15 to 18. You shall do no injustice in judgment. You shall not be partial to the poor nor honor the person of the mighty. In righteousness you shall judge your neighbor. You shall not go about as a talebearer among your people. Nor you take a stand against the life of your neighbor. I am the Lord. Okay. So, what he’s saying is that he wants you not to take a stand against the life of your neighbor.

The sixth commandment is not either deliberately or accidentally damaging the life of your neighbor. And that’s why commentators always connect up these verses to the sixth commandment primarily. And so, what we’re told here is that uh in order to not stand against the life of your neighbor, in order to properly apply the commandment not to do damage to your neighbor’s life. In the sixth word, we’re told here are some specific things to do.

And the first thing it says is don’t go about as a talebearer. Goes on to say, you shall not hate your brother in your heart. You shall surely rebuke your neighbor and not bear sin because of him. You shall not take vengeance nor bear any grudge against the children of your people, but you shall love your neighbor as yourself. I am the Lord. Love the neighbor as yourself. Return his property. It’s the same basic theme going on.

So these verses in Leviticus chapter 19, which is the very center, by the way, of that 70 commandment structure of application of the ten commandments. The very heart of it is to love your neighbor as yourself. And it tells us some very specific ways to do that. So we’re not supposed to stand against the life of our neighbor. We’re supposed to enhance the life of our neighbor. And I’ve got in your outlines in several directions.

First, by not slandering him. Our reputation, our name is our life. Okay. So, the first thing it says is don’t stand against the life of your neighbor. It’s not a small thing to slander your neighbor, to talk about him, to get together, say, “Oh, did you hear about this? Oh, did you know about this? Oh, isn’t that what isn’t he like this?” That’s slandering your neighbor. And when we do that, we’re violating the sixth commandment.

It’s like we’re killing him. It’s like we’re, you know, murdering him because a person’s reputation is almost, I would say, it’s almost more important than his physical life. You know, if you shoot me, I go to heaven and that’s that. If you slander me, you know, I got to live with that loss of reputation and with that slander forever long it might take to get sorted out. And even then, you know how it is.

If I could set up a mental image in your mind of something and even though you may know it’s not true, the mental image sticks and it’s kind of colors your perception of that person. So you may even be able to get rid of the specifics of the slander but the tint of slander right the tint of slander the tint of you know something bad will stay with that person and his reputation to you. So it’s I would say it’s worse than killing somebody.

don’t do it. you know we are commanded to stand for the life of our neighbor and to do that we want to use our speech in a way that does not and cannot be read by someone else as slandering our neighbor. Really important stuff. Secondly, by not having a bad attitude toward him. All right? Because that’s what it goes on to say. Says don’t be a talebearer among your people. don’t take a stand against your neighbor’s life.

Don’t hate your brother in your heart. Don’t have a bad attitude, right? Don’t hate your brother in your heart. things happen in families, in communities. We all get sideways because we’re all sinners. And even if we weren’t all sinners, we’re all sort of imperfect in our understanding and what we try to communicate, whether we’re committing sin or whether we’re just sinning by not being more careful.

about how we act toward one another. Bad things happen in community. And this verse tells us, don’t have a bad attitude toward your neighbor. Trust in God’s vindication of something’s going wrong. Right? so, so you know, Rushdoony says that this text is a reminder to do a mental dump of information. It affects your memory. Somebody’s done something wrong. Somebody, you know, is maybe they’ve really done something wrong against you.

and you have this in your memory. God says, “Get rid of it. Flush the memory. Do a reboot on the computer. Don’t hold that person’s this bad attitude toward that person in your mind.” The best way we could apply the advent of Jesus who brings neighborly love as we move toward the new year is to make a commitment right here to be careful with our speech toward each other first of all. And then secondly, to try to do this dump of our memory memories.

God says your memory is something you’re under control of. You’re supposed to dump it if it’s causing you to have a bad attitude toward your neighbor. Don’t have a bad attitude toward your neighbor. Now, you know, it’s not just about your thoughts, though. It’s about reality, too. Says, don’t hate your brother in your heart. You shall surely rebuke your neighbor and not bear sin because of him. So, in other words, your neighbor, you know, every time, let’s say you’re living next to somebody here at the church and every time you get up in the morning, They take their garbage and throw it on your lawn, you know.

And so, well, Pastor Tuuri says, “I got to have a good attitude. Don’t want to be standing against life, my neighbor. Don’t want to go tell the church about it because don’t want to be a talebearer and don’t want to hold in my mind. So, I’m going to do a mental dump for what he did.” Well, no. In order to do a mental dump, a lot of times you have to do what the very next part of the verse says to do. You have to reason firmly.

That’s what this says here. You got to reason firmly. with your neighbor, you shall surely rebuke him. It doesn’t mean call him a name. It means to reason firmly, although nicely and charitably, with your neighbor about their sin. You’re not supposed to forget it if he just keeps dumping garbage on your yard deliberately. Part of the way we love each other and stand for each other’s life, again, it’s sort of counterintuitive, but it’s true, is by loving enough to talk to our neighbor kindly, gently, love lovingly but firmly reasoning with them about what they have done improperly.

You know, the world is filled with all kinds of people, but you know, there’s there’s people that don’t really like controversy and there’s people that are more they don’t shrink from controversy. They don’t really think about it all that much. And so for people that are prone to be forthright and outspoken, you know, they know this part, the rebuking part. Oh, yeah. I do it all the time. Now, they may not do it very much in love.

They may do it in a way that makes them keep mental attitudes of hatred toward each other. And they may do it in terms of slandering other people, but at least they’re talking to people. Now, you got other kind of people. They don’t like controversy. They just assume let the matter be all papered over and not worry about it, you know. But what happens is if you don’t like controversy, some people, a lot of people that don’t want to rebuke their neighbor, that don’t have the courage to speak directly to someone or think it’s unloving.

They’re going to get a bad attitude in their heart. And that’s exactly what this verse is. Don’t do that. And the way you don’t have a bad attitude is by speaking forthrightly with your neighbor. You know, it’s amazing to me how people’s reputations in any community, including church communities, they can get real sideways when nobody’s really ever talked to somebody about the things everybody’s getting sideways with them about.

Everybody’s just talking over here about somebody else, but nobody really wants to directly talk to them and work it through to resolution. That’s a little bit of an exaggeration for effect, but you know what I’m saying. The end result of that is you stand against the life of that person. You end up having a perspective on their character that you then share with other people and you slander that person and you’re standing against the life of that person.

You might as well just shoot them and put them down because it’s easier for him to die and go to heaven than to walk around him or her for years with a bad reputation because people won’t forthrightly talk to him. kindly and gently but firmly reasoning with them about the things that they’re doing wrong. The sixth commandment says we’re supposed to love each other enough to stand for each other’s life.

And the way we do that is by avoiding slander, avoiding bad attitudes. And the way we do that, the text says, is to speak with your neighbor about the things that are bugging you. Whether they’re real or perceived, you got to do it. The commentary commenting on this says that you’re supposed to talk frankly and, I would say charitably, but they say it this way. In truth and humility, and in loving consideration of a man, nicely put, that’s how you go about talking to somebody about perceived problems that you see in their life.

So, frankly and charitably about what he may be doing that could be sinful. And then we get back to the mental state. You shall surely rebuke your neighbor, not bear sin because of him. And there’s the other thing. Not only do you sin against him, but you’re bearing sin. If you fail to do that and have a mental attitude against him, now you’re bearing sin. Okay? They say that the slanderer kills three people.

He kills the person he’s talking about the reputation. He kills the person that it goes into their ear and changes their attitude and makes them more twisted. And it kills you for articulating such a thing. It makes your perspective on life and people twisted. So, it does this three-fold murder. The ancients have said, “Well, here you bear sin if you don’t rebuke your neighbor charitably but frankly. Then it says you shall not take vengeance nor bear any grudge.

And here again it’s commanding you not and here it’s not just doing a mental dump of what he’s done. This is prohibiting nursing a grudge. You know a nurse nourishes something and feeds it. And usually we can’t stay neutral in our head when we’ve got a bad attitude towards somebody because we haven’t worked it out or just you know, let God take care of it. Sometimes you can’t work it out to fruition, but you just got to leave it with God.

Well, usually we don’t. It’s not just a matter of having a bad attitude. Usually we then nurse that bad attitude. Usually then we’ll we’ll interpret all kinds of other events in terms of that bad attitude. Right? So now the person says X and we’ll say, “Oh, see that reinforces what I thought they were a jerk about.” And this is the specific thing that’s being talked about here is nursing. grudge. Not just having a grudge, but actually, you know, talking to yourself, that internal conversation, evaluating other actions of the, “Oh, I see now why they said that.

I understand that now, cuz they’re jerks and they’re this and they’re that.” And that’s nursing a grudge. You see, and again, God wants us to do this mental dump, this memory dump. Control your memories. And don’t nurse a grudge. And the best way not to nurse a grudge is to kill it. Get rid of it. If it sits there in your shows them this grudge, you’re likely going to try to nurse it along because otherwise you feel kind of guilty.

Why do I feel have this bad attitude towards somebody? You need to come up with reasons why, right? If you’re going to have a story that somebody’s a jerk, then you got to have unless you’re just completely have no conscience, you got to come up with a lot of reasons as to why they’re a jerk. So, you start filling in all these reasons and you’re nursing a grudge. Then, that’s what this particular phrase in Hebrew is about.

Bearing a grudge doesn’t mean just carrying it means actually nursing it along. All this is standing against the life of our neighbor. All this is a violation of the sixth commandment. Nursing a grudge. Rushdoony talks about this mental thing. He says our memory is to be purged and our outlook thereby altered. We view men and events in terms of our memory. In this respect, memory is an invaluable and necessary tool for learning.

ing because our knowledge of the past gives us discernment for the present and future. Thus, where a man has repented and made restitution, we warp ourselves by continuing to harbor a grudge. This aspect of Leviticus 19:18 deals with our mind and memory. Very astute, I think. Very good. So, part of obeying the sixth commandment is having a proper memory where we redefine things in the context of our love.

1 Corinthians 13:5 says that love of which means God thinks no evil and it doesn’t keep a list of wrongs suffered. See, when we keep a list of wrongs suffered from somebody, we’re nursing a grudge. And when we think evil about people, we’re harboring a bad attitude in our heart. And Jesus comes down to bring neighborly love. And God’s character described in 1 Corinthians 13 is such that it doesn’t do that.

It doesn’t do these things and neither should we. And then by finally by actively loving each other instead. Leviticus 19 goes on to say, “Don’t bear a grudge against the children of your people. But you shall love your neighbor as yourself.” And I’ve made this point a couple of times now, but in the particular Hebrew there, you shall love your neighbor. You shall love to your neighbor is what it actually says.

There’s this implication of preposition there. So it’s not talking about a mental attitude just of love. You’re supposed to have love to your neighbor. You’re supposed to be doing something right. So the end result of the way to change your attitude to do take care of all these problems that are, you know, standing against the life of your neighbor in violation of the sixth word. The culmination of the best way to deal with that is to engage in active love to your neighbor.

That’s why we need Christmas every year. We got, you know, that’s why it’s good to actively love each other by giving them gifts. and putting out a good attitude again and starting the year off right again by purging all the old slanders, harboring of grudges, failure to speak forthrightly to one another. May the Lord God grant us that as we enter into the new year, we’ll do so remembering that ultimately the advent of Jesus Christ that we celebrated yesterday is the coming of love.

It’s the coming of neighbor neighborliness. What did the fall do? It produced unneighborliness even between husband and wife, bickering, fighting, bad attitudes, grudges, slanders. That’s what the fallen community is. And Jesus came to definitively roll back the curse by rolling back our violations of the sixth word committed not so much with our knives, but with the knife, you know, that comes out of our tongue.

Jesus says the sword comes out of his tongue to speak the truth in love. And as a result, it’s a healing device. He slays us from the preaching of his word and he brings us back together. That’s what the Savior does. And may the Lord God cause us to rejoice in the advent of Jesus Christ. Look at the new year to come and commit ourselves afresh to love actively. That’s what Jesus did. That’s what we who are made in his image are to do.

We’re to rebuild Christian community that has been destroyed by the fall. Jesus came. Christmas is about the advent of neighborliness. The advent of the ability to love God and to love our neighbor as ourselves the way God loves us. May the Lord God grant us this year in our families in this church with our friends the grace to put aside consciously to commit to put aside slanders, bad attitudes, harboring of grudges and put on frankness of speech and active deeds of love given toward one another.

This will be living out Christmas in the context of our lives. And this will lead to that great rejoicing together that is spoken of at the end of Moses’ sermon. May the Lord God be blessed for bringing life and that abundantly as our savior said. Let’s pray. Father, we thank you for our savior’s advent. We thank you for the coming of him who came that we might have life in that abundantly. Forgive us, Father, for all the ways that we diminish our lives and the lives of those around us.

And bless us, Father, as we attempt to commit ourselves afresh in the power of the Holy Spirit to love one another. In Jesus name we pray. Amen.

Show Full Transcript (51,937 characters)
Collapse Transcript

COMMUNION HOMILY

instead is the one who comes and ministers to the man who has been beaten and left for dead. Our savior was the one who was despised and rejected by his own people. So I think the Samaritan is a good imagery of that as our savior.

In that parable Jesus says this. He said, “But a certain Samaritan, as he journeyed, came where he was and when he saw him he had compassion.” Our savior has compassion for us, for sinners. That’s why he came to our world.

So he went to him and he bandaged his wounds, pouring on oil and wine, and he set him on his own animal, brought him to an inn and took care of him. Surely our savior’s care for us in his coming is pictured in these actions of the good Samaritan. His compassion becomes actions. Jesus bandages our wounds essentially. He brings us back from death, of course, but he takes care of us. He takes care of our difficulties. He bandages our wounds.

And more than that, he pours on oil and wine. He gives us great abundant blessing through the context of the Holy Spirit. And then wine, a picture of this meal that we partake of as well. And he sets us on his own animal and he brings us to an inn. Our savior comes to bandage us, to bring us back to life, to bless us. And then in the context of that further blessing of maturing us, he takes us to an inn.

And then he leaves the person in the care of the innkeeper. And the next day when he departed, he took out two denarii. He gave them to the innkeeper and said to him, “Take care of him. And whatever more you spend, when I come again, I will repay you.” The good Samaritan leaves and he leaves us in the care of innkeepers whose very sustenance is provided by him. The church I think is being imaged here. The tithes belong properly to the king, to the Lord Jesus Christ, are given to the innkeeper, the church, the pastors of the church.

And our job is the care of souls. Jesus has provided us, these churches, to carry on the care for us, to heal us, and to bring us back to full mature health in the context of who we are. So I think we have in this good Samaritan image an example to us of course to be good Samaritans, to be neighborly, to be loving. But we have a wonderful picture of our savior who himself does this. He comes to die for our sins ultimately. This is the way he bandages our wounds—is by taking our wounds upon himself. He brings us to life and then he leaves us not in and of ourselves, but he leaves us in the context of an inn, a place of life and blessing, joy, food and living. He leaves us in the context of the church where we can mature together under his direction and oversight and eventually he’ll return for us as well.

It is a wonderful picture to us when we come to this in feast every Lord’s day. It’s a picture of the care of the ultimate good Samaritan, the Lord Jesus Christ, and who we are in him.

As they were eating, Jesus took bread, blessed, and broke it, and he gave it to his disciples and said, “Take, eat. This is my body.”

Let’s pray. Lord God, according to the precept and example of our Lord Jesus Christ, we give you thanks for this bread. We thank you for your care for us. We thank you that our savior, the second person of the trinity, your begotten son, only begotten son, came to earth, took on human flesh, to bring us productiveness and fruitfulness, to take upon himself our sins, to give us health, to bring us back from the dead—not just back from poor health, but from dead. We thank you for that, Lord God, not as we ought but as we are able.

And we pray that you would bless us now as we partake of this food given to us by the hand of our savior. May we remember that all of our lives really are recipients. We’re recipients of his grace, his care, his nurture. And remind us as well, Father, as we partake of this, that care and nurture comes through other people, through innkeepers and members of that same inn. Bless us, Lord God, as the one love. Give us, Father, the spirit of the Savior that we might minister to each other and continuing continue to nurse one another to full fruitfulness.

In Jesus’ name we ask it. Amen. Come.

Q&A SESSION

Q1: Questioner:
In this disposable society where people don’t take care of their property or don’t care about it, what do you do when you find something and you attempt to take care of it, but nobody comes to claim it?

Pastor Tuuri:
Well, you keep it. I mean, the scriptures don’t say anything about that. So, well, it’s like here at RCC—with the lost and found four weeks, you know, we give plenty of time for people to attend to it and then at the end of four weeks, we put it in the exchange or, you know, if it’s obviously of no interest to anybody, we’ll get rid of it.

But we try to put it in the exchange because, you know, here at RCC, I know some people, several people that when things show up in the lost and found they kind of wait and at the end of four weeks they’d like it. They can have it. And there’s nothing wrong with that either, you know. So that’s why it’s nice to put in the exchange for a little bit so people have seen it and thought, well, if nobody else wants it, I’d sure like it, but they’re not going to take it first.

But yeah, surely I mean, if you know, you do your best and doesn’t mean you got to keep things forever. But the whole idea is developing an attitude of neighborliness. It’s not “finders, keepers, losers, weepers.” It’s you know, I’m going to care for my neighbor. Whether it’s my neighbor, a stranger, or even somebody that, you know, hates me, I’m going to do what’s right by him.

Q2: Questioner:
One of the verses that makes me think about helping others is where it says, “Bear one another’s burdens.” And then right after it says, “Each one shall carry his own load.” And Dr. Congden, one of your teachers here at Boalt Noma, commented on that one day where you, you know, you have a load to carry in your life and hey, it’s kind of up to you to carry that load, but sometimes you have a burden which I guess is like too much for you to carry. And then that’s an indicator that maybe you ought to help out. So, you don’t want to meddle and help everybody with every little thing. But on the other hand, if you see a true burden, then you step up and you say, “Hey, let me help you with that.”

Pastor Tuuri:
Yeah, that’s really good. That’s excellent. And I probably should have made the point that, you know, not many of us are going to find each other’s property. But there are these burdens that we can see if we’re looking, you know, in the context of our community here particularly to begin with.

We’re looking for people that are burdened and then try to, you know, it’s amazing to me, you know, we’ve been doing this a long time and it is amazing. It’s difficult for people just to call somebody who’s burdened to say, “I’m praying for you.” I don’t know why it is, but it’s hard to do and yet it means so much when you’re going through those times when you have those burdens.

Questioner:
Yeah, that’s really good. Thank you for that.

Q3: Chris W.:
Dennis, do you think it’s a trend in our society to be even less confrontational than we used to be? It seems like at least in the sports world and maybe in the entertainment and music world that when people have issues with other people, whether it’s a teammate, a coach, another celebrity what have you, the way they seem to communicate that is through Facebook or Twitter or some other way and the other person finds out about this beef that this person has with them through those means as opposed to just giving them a phone call or yeah writing them a letter.

Pastor Tuuri:
I think that’s absolutely true and it’s just the result of moving away from Christ and you move. When you move away from Christ you move against those verses in Leviticus and so you move away from direct confrontation and more toward slandering and you know people—I don’t know Facebook’s a weird deal people don’t realize that when they put maybe they do but when they put things on there the whole world can see it for the most part, you know. I think you’re absolutely right and that’s just a result of moving away from Christianity.

Q4: Questioner:
I’m right behind Chris here with a comment and question. My comment is regarding the inadvertent loss of property—you know, the inadvertent move of a landmark could be something that this law covers as well. If two neighbors and it could, you know, happen over generations where you assume a landmark exists and then you discover, you know, through digging or whatever, oh, the landmark really should be here—you know, it seems like that law would indicate that you ought to return your property to your neighbor or he ought to return it to you depending on, you know, where the landmark should have fallen.

Pastor Tuuri:
No, I think that’s right. And I’ve known cases for instance just to maybe briefly comment where you know they have this thing called law of adverse possession. So somebody doesn’t take care, exercise dominion over property, you can adversely possess it after seven years. The intent of that is that if people just don’t care anymore or not being good stewards, you know, there’s a process to take care of that. The land ultimately belongs to God.

The problem is in our sinful nature we tend to say, “Oh, he hasn’t noticed that he’s, you know, he’s not using this property and we just kind of, you know, keep quiet until the seven years is up and then we adversely possess it.” I know people that have done that and it’s similar to what you’re talking about. You really have an obligation to tell them, you know, actually the boundary’s been moved and really this is your property.

So, is that what you were getting at?

Questioner:
Yeah, yeah, I think that’s right.

Q5: Questioner:
My question is in regard to Luke 10 and the story of the Good Samaritan. The question that was asked was “who is my neighbor?” Right. And Jesus answers the question. He says—and he doesn’t say, you know, “who loved his neighbor.” He said “who was neighbor to him who fell among the thieves.” Yes. So it’s like the Samaritan was the actual neighbor.

Pastor Tuuri:
Oh yes, absolutely.

Questioner:
And so Jesus is telling the lawyer who hates the Samaritan, you got to love this guy who was actually the neighbor to the Jew. That’s good. Yeah. Is that a correct understanding? I guess that’s kind of the way I’ve understood it. My question is, do you think that’s right?

Pastor Tuuri:
I think that’s right. Yeah.

Q6: Tyler C.:
Hey, Pastor Tuuri. This is Tyler C. I have a question from verse four. It talks about when you’re on the way side and you see your brother’s donkey or ox has fallen down and you need to help stop and help him lift them up again. I see this as being like if a farmer is taking his load of potatoes to market and his ox goes lame on him. Does this—and so I see this as kind of being analogist to today when we see a stranded motorist on the highway and such. Yeah, how does that correlate to today? Because usually when you see that you’re going 60 mph and you can’t stop in time or you have to turn around on the freeway and how do you see that correlating to today?

Pastor Tuuri:
Well, I think you’re right. I think that’s what you want to do is you want to help people that are broken down by the side of the road if you can. Now, you know, some people aren’t any help. I mean, but if you can help the guy in his car, yeah, I think that’s absolutely right. And if you’re going 60 mph, well, you take the exit and you come around and try to help them. So I think that’s a good application of it.

Q7: Questioner:
You know, one other thing is that—go ahead. Unfortunately, with liability laws sometimes—I don’t know how it’s doing these days, but for a while, physicians were reticent to actually help people alongside the road because then they could be sued by the person they’re helping, you know, depending on what they did. And so, but I think some states have implemented Good Samaritan laws where they’re holding physicians not liable for some of that. So, anyway, go ahead. I’m sorry.

Questioner:
Is that Dan? Yeah, I actually found a bicycle and talked to some neighbors, put out a sign, and it was recovered by the person who owned it.

Pastor Tuuri:
That’s great.

Questioner:
Kid had it. I was thinking, you know, if he gets hit by a car on that bike, they’re probably going to sue me.

Q8: Questioner:
There’s a scale of relationships. You have the Italian model from the movie Moonstruck where you know when something happens you just blurt out your response and it’s very explosive. Then you’ve got the where people avoid confrontation where they, um, inhibit themselves. They right, they don’t confront and they take it back and don’t deal with it. In this scale, the explosive confrontational couples are more intimate huh than the ones that are non-confrontational. The closeness is much more towards the Italian side. Huh. So anyway, just that’s interesting.

Pastor Tuuri:
Well, and part of that too is, you know, you just you sort of got to understand who you are. I’m the sort of guy that blurts things out and I sin that way. So, I have to try as much as I can with God’s grace not doing that so much. So, I’m usually not going to sin by being unconfront­ational. I’m going to sin by being confrontationally sinful. So, I just got to know that about myself.

Other people have to know that they’re going to sin by non-confrontation, not involvement. So, they got to push themselves to engage. I have to push myself back from engaging very quickly and becoming more thoughtful and try to measure my words, which I don’t do very good. So, part of it is, yeah, I mean, they’re different people, different kinds of styles that you’ve been given and you really can’t do much about that, but you can understand who you are and then try to make adjustments, right?

Q9: Questioner:
So, you know, the culture I come from—I’m from Japan. We try everything to avoid confrontation. Yes. Because it’s important to live with harmony. Yes. In tens of people in a smaller area. We don’t want to kill each other. So I remember the first time we gather at the church to decide the name at the judge’s house. I was there. I was just flabbergasted because it’s a fighting. I never seen anything like that. So I thought, wow, what am I getting into, right?

Pastor Tuuri:
Well, you should have known. Like in Japan, because of that, it’s just backbiting and people talking about other people in back. So at least it’s everything’s open here. Then it’s a lot easier to live.

Questioner:
You know, and the other thing is that I’m not a hunter, but I know you’re supposed to shoot the buck deer, not the girl. The reason being, they I was told it’s population control. Huh. That doesn’t make sense to me. If you want to do population control, you’re going to shoot the girl, right? Yes. So it’s interesting based on those biblical principles that you just stay away from. Yeah, that’s that’s good. Well, then why do people say it’s based on biblical principle? If you want population control and you got to shoot the girl.

Pastor Tuuri:
Yeah, I don’t know. That is weird because you know clearly if a female—because I mean too far if you have a girlfriend. Now, if you shoot the doe, if you shoot the doe, you kill one fawn or two maybe for that year. If you shoot the buck, you kill hundreds because he’s—he doesn’t have one girlfriend. He’s—I don’t know about the biblical principles, but biologically, you shoot the buck, you kill more deer.

Questioner:
Yes. Absolutely. You know that thing about Japanese culture. I heard that for instance, I think it was Koreans make horrible airplane pilots because the Korean culture is very anti—they don’t want to object to authority. They want to keep very quiet, not have controversy. And so a Korean co-pilot in an airplane will not tell the guy he’s doing something wrong and the whole plane will just crash.

Q10: Questioner:
Hey Dennis. Yeah, I don’t know if you talked about this yet, but who was the enforcement for these laws or were they just suggestions?

Pastor Tuuri:
Well, remember that this is a sermon, right?

Questioner:
No, I mean—I mean no, I mean Moses thing is a sermon. It’s not a law book.

Pastor Tuuri:
So, it’s a—I think these things are sermonic. And so, some of these laws would be enforced by the civil government. Others wouldn’t. So, I think it’s hard to figure out which ones the civil government actually enforces. These are sermon illustrations that he’s using to indicate a way of life that’s supposed to happen. Clearly some of them have civil obligations.

You know, the death penalty for murders. That’s phrased in the context of a court situation with elders involved. But these ones today, they’re not phrased that way. And so, you know, every one of our modern inclination is to make the state enforce all of them. But it seems like that’s not the idea in the text—that the ones that we clearly know the state is to enforce are the ones that you know have elder involvement such as the ones we looked at with the death penalty, cities of refuge, etc.

Does that help?

Questioner:
Yeah, because state probably wouldn’t get involved with bird nests, but you know, but the parapets that seems to be kind of where all the zoning is sprung out. I mean, yes. So, you know, fences around swimming pools, you know, all—yeah.

Pastor Tuuri:
Well, that’s what I mentioned about, I think, last week maybe I talked about this new law about you can’t have cribs where the side drops down because over the last five years, several toddlers—I don’t know if anybody’s been killed or not, but they’ve been hurt. So, the instinct in that is a good one. We do want to try to avoid accidental harming of human life, but every instinct in American culture these days it’s all about law. It’s all about the civil government and it’s all about prevention and so we end up with the loss of freedom because it’s a Christian instinct but it’s gone to seed and it’s become a statist instinct instead.

So, you know, I think a lot of the instincts are good but because we’re post-Christian we don’t see the importance of freedom and creating these cultures where people have these decisions to make. You know, another way to look at it is we’ve taken tort law, you know, where damages are awarded by courts for making an unsafe product and that’s a way of restraining it. Instead, we’ve turned it into preventive law to where we can’t let people make certain products. To me, it seems like that kind of thing is bad because it stifles creativity. It removes individual responsibility and it creates an attitude where people think if it isn’t illegal, it must be okay—must not be unsafe if it’s not illegal.

So, I think personally that the whole instinct has become way too civil government oriented to enforcing all this stuff instead of like you said, you know, the state really isn’t—shouldn’t be in the business of telling us if you happen and you know, look at the way it’s phrased, right? If you happen to come across a bird’s nest with a mother, you know, that’s not a law, right? That’s clearly a something else going on. So, I personally think that most of these things should not be the subject of civil laws.

Questioner:
Did you have a thought?

Questioner:
No. No. I—No, I agree. You know, we I’m sure we have way too many laws. You know, they were talking about in England how they’re taking away the stop lights and letting people make their own choices, especially in the smaller towns where you think you have to regulate every intersection. They’re doing away with them. And they have less accidents and less problems by doing that because people take more responsibility.

Pastor Tuuri:
Yeah, that’s great. That’s a good illustration.

Questioner:
Is that like—I’ve been on—we’ve been doing this too long, Kyle. Is that anybody else? Okay, then let’s adjourn.