AI-GENERATED SUMMARY

This sermon continues the examination of the eighth commandment (“You shall not steal”) by expounding on the case laws in Deuteronomy 24:8–25:3, which define true social justice through the lens of God’s law rather than humanistic sentiment1,2,3. Pastor Tuuri contrasts the modern “social justice” movement—which often utilizes statist redistribution and debt—with biblical justice, which emphasizes individual responsibility (Deut 24:16), the protection of property rights, and voluntary charity such as gleaning and interest-free loans4,5,6. He critiques the “Circle of Protection” initiative for providing a religious imprimatur to big government programs that ultimately hurt the poor by destroying the currency and creating dependency, instead advocating for the principles of “Christians for a Sustainable Economy” (CASE)6,7. The message structures the text to show that justice and mercy are intertwined, with the central tenet being that fathers are not to be punished for the sins of their sons, refuting the environmental determinism that undergirds much modern policy8,9. Practical application calls for the congregation to engage in “Justice Inc.” by protecting the “golden goose” of economic productivity through political action, while simultaneously practicing personal benevolence and “gleaning” in their own communities10,11.

SERMON OUTLINE

Deut. 24:8-25:3
The 8th Word and Social Justice, Part 2
The Eighth Word (And You Shall Not Steal), Part Five
Sermon Notes for July 31, 2011 by Pastor Dennis R. Tuuri
Pr. 29:7; Erasing Hell and Humanism
What Is Meant by “Social Justice?”
Biblical Justice and Its Effects on Society
Society’s Redefinition of Justice Based on Humanistic Assumptions
Social Contract – Social Justice – “An Idiot God”
Biblical Emphases and Terminology Coupled with Non-biblical Statist Means
The Great Importance of Biblical Social Justice
More Important than Worship Jer. 7
The Father’s Heart and Ours Jer. 9:23,24; Dt. 10:18,19; Ps. 68:5; 146:9
Severe Judgments for its Absence Eze. 16:49; Mt. 25:41-46
The Components of Biblical Social Justice
A Humble and Gracious Heart (Caveat – Lazy, etc.)
Humility, Ethanol Subsidies and Crony Capitalism
Equal Treatment in Court – Dt. 24:17 (Justice); 21:1-9 (No Indifference); Pr. 31:8,9
Make the Poor GLAD (Gleaning, Loans, Alms, Dues)
King Job – Job 31:16-20
Protecting (Including Politically) Private Property, the “Free” Market and the Family
—-
Amos; Zech. 7:9,10
The Need for “Bible Heads” to Teach the World – Dt. 24:8-25:3 (See Attached) A. Degrees of “Poverty” and the Exchange – Lev. 25:35-38; 25:25-28
A Solution to Payday Loans? and Another Exchange
Personal Responsibility vs. Blood Feuds – v. 16; Eze. 18:1-9; Gen. 3:9-13 Who is responsible, and to Whom?
Commanded Justice in the Gate (Ex. 22:2,3)
Commanded Benevolence in the “Field”
Evaluating Corporate Responsibility – Bottom Lines
Walnuts and The Code – “… but not at the expense of the environment, human rights, the public health or safety, the communities in which the corporation operates, or the dignity of its employees.”
The Triple Bottom Line (TBL, 3BL – People, Planet, Profit; Genetic Fallaccy)
Pleasing God
Deuteronomy 24:8–25:3 (NKJV)
8 “Take heed in an outbreak of leprosy, that you carefully observe and do according to all that the priests, the Levites, shall teach you; just as I commanded them, so you shall be careful to do. 9 Remember what the LORD your God did to Miriam on the way when you came out of Egypt!
10 “When you lend your brother anything, you shall not go into his house to get his pledge. 11
You shall stand outside, and the man to whom you lend shall bring the pledge out to you. 12 And if the man is poor, you shall not keep his pledge overnight. 13 You shall in any case return the pledge to him again when the sun goes down, that he may sleep in his own garment and bless you; and it shall be righteousness to you before the LORD your God.
14 “You shall not oppress a hired servant who is poor and needy, whether one of your brethren or one of the aliens who is in your land within your gates. 15 Each day you shall give him his wages, and not let the sun go down on it, for he is poor and has set his heart on it; lest he cry out against you to the LORD, and it be sin to you.
“Fathers shall not be put to death for their children, nor shall children be put to death for their fathers; a person shall be put to death for his own sin.
“You shall not pervert justice due the stranger or the fatherless, nor take a widow’s garment as a pledge. 18 But you shall remember that you were a slave in Egypt, and the LORD your God redeemed you from there; therefore I command you to do this thing. 19 “When you reap your harvest in your field, and forget a sheaf in the field, you shall not go back to get it; it shall be for the stranger, the fatherless, and the widow, that the LORD your God may bless you in all the work of your hands. 20 When you beat your olive trees, you shall not go over the boughs again; it shall be for the stranger, the fatherless, and the widow. 21 When you gather the grapes of your vineyard, you shall not glean it afterward; it shall be for the stranger, the fatherless, and the widow. 22 And you shall remember that you were a slave in the land of Egypt; therefore I command you to do this thing.
1 “If there is a dispute between men, and they come to court, that the judges may judge them, and they justify the righteous and condemn the wicked, 2 then it shall be, if the wicked man deserves to be beaten, that the judge will cause him to lie down and be beaten in his presence, according to his guilt, with a certain number of blows. 3 Forty blows he may give him and no more, lest he should exceed this and beat him with many blows above these, and your brother be humiliated in your sight.
Steps to Implement Biblical Social Justice
1. Know Your Bible 2. Know Your Bible
Know Your Bible
Tithe, Tracking the Benevolence Portion
Accumulate Wealth by Diligence
When Necessary, Accept Charity Charitably
Fight (Politically) the Killing of the Golden Goose (Register Voters, PAC Tax Credit, Etc.)
Fight (Educationally) the Killing of the Golden Goose
Remember and Do the Three Gifts (GKL)
Make known to the Deacons gleaning opportunities at your home or work.
Make known to the Deacons if you have money for poor loans.
Have an open heart and hands for single moms.
Be a lunch buddy or a mentor parent.
Start a discussion group on helping the poor.
Be part of the party in 2035. 52 to 26 to Zero (58:Fast Living by Scott C. Todd)

SERMON TRANSCRIPT

Well, we turn to that law. I guess that was a reminder to me that sorry that we ran out of outlines this morning, and I’m sorry the date is one week off. This is the second part of a two-part series on social justice in the Bible. And this is part of our continuing series on the Ten Words referred to in the Bible as the Ten Words, the Ten Commandments, this law that we just sang of. And I note that like many songs, this particular song was heavy on the use of the law to bring us to Christ, to show us our sin.

And it does have one verse, you know, as kind of a reference to the use of the law in showing us the way in which we should walk. And it doesn’t seem to have any reference to another area of the law’s use, which is to inform our civil politics. The law, of course, was given to a saved people at Sinai. And its exposition in Exodus and Deuteronomy was to prepare them for the sorts of personal lives and governments that they were to build.

So we turn again to that law and to a portion of the exposition of the law of God found in Deuteronomy. Our subject is the Eighth Word, and this is the conclusion of a two-part series on social justice. Deuteronomy 24:8-25:3. I know it’s a little long, but I believe it is a particular section, a bounded section with judgments as we’ll see before and after, and then a lot of stuff about so-called social justice in the middle of that.

You can follow along in your outlines if you got one. There is a structure to it that I’ll be alluding to as we proceed in the sermon. And please stand for the reading of God’s word to us, and ask that the Holy Spirit might help us to understand it and apply the equity of it to our day and age.

Deuteronomy 24, beginning at verse 8:

“Take heed in an outbreak of leprosy, that you carefully observe and do according to all that the priests, the Levites, shall teach you; just as I commanded them, so you shall be careful to do. Remember what the LORD your God did to Miriam on the way when you came out of Egypt. When you lend your brother anything, you shall not go into his house to get his pledge. You shall stand outside, and the man to whom you lend shall bring the pledge out to you. And if the man is poor, you shall not keep his pledge overnight. You shall in any case return the pledge to him again when the sun goes down, that he may sleep in his own garment and bless you; and it shall be righteousness to you before the LORD your God.

You shall not oppress a hired servant who is poor and needy, whether one of your brethren or one of the aliens who is in your land within your gates. Each day you shall give him his wages, and not let the sun go down on it, for he is poor and has set his heart on it; lest he cry out against you to the LORD, and it be sin to you. Fathers shall not be put to death for their children, nor shall children be put to death for their fathers. A person shall be put to death for his own sin. You shall not pervert justice due the stranger or the fatherless, nor take a widow’s garment as a pledge. But you shall remember that you were a slave in Egypt, and the LORD your God redeemed you from there; therefore I command you to do this thing.

When you reap your harvest in your field, and forget a sheaf in the field, you shall not go back to get it; it shall be for the stranger, the fatherless, and the widow, that the LORD your God may bless you in all the work of your hands. When you beat your olive trees, you shall not go over the boughs again; it shall be for the stranger, the fatherless, and the widow. When you gather the grapes of your vineyard, you shall not glean it afterward; it shall be for the stranger, the fatherless, and the widow. And you shall remember that you were a slave in the land of Egypt; therefore I command you to do this thing.

If there is a dispute between men, and they come to court, that the judges may judge them, and they justify the righteous and condemn the wicked, then it shall be, if the wicked man deserves to be beaten, that the judge will cause him to lie down and be beaten in his presence, according to his guilt, with a certain number of blows. Forty blows he may give him and no more, lest he should exceed this and beat him with many blows above these, and your brother be humiliated in your sight.”

Let’s pray. Lord God, we thank you for your word. We bless your holy name for the beauty of it, the structure of it, the meaning of it. Father, help us to understand it based upon the gospel of our Lord Jesus Christ. Help us, Father, to avoid improper definitions of social justice that aren’t based in your scriptures. And help us to embrace true social justice as your scriptures describe it to us here and in other places. Help us to understand your word. Transform us by your Spirit. In Jesus’ name we ask it, and for the sake of his kingdom, not ours. Amen.

Please be seated. It’s a wonderful day. A beautiful day in God’s neighborhood. A day of the proclamation. Yeah. It’s a day for laughter and joy. It’s a day of the proclamation of the release from oppression and from our sins that the Lord Jesus Christ affected. It is a day to proclaim liberty throughout our community, indeed throughout the land, indeed throughout the whole world because of what the Lord Jesus Christ has done.

We say with the Lord, “The Spirit of the Lord is upon us. He has anointed us to preach the gospel to the poor. He has sent us to heal the brokenhearted, to proclaim liberty to the captives, recovering of sight to the blind, to set at liberty those who are oppressed, to proclaim the acceptable year of the Lord.” Jesus said that of himself in a sermon. And it’s true today that we live in that acceptable year of the Lord. And we live in the times of which Jesus is continuing through the proclamation of the gospel to the poor, to set at liberty those who are oppressed.

Now, the gospel is the good news of the ascension of the Savior King to the throne and his rule now by his Spirit and through his people in the context of the world. That is wonderful news. And it’s a day today for rejoicing for salvation from sins, but more than that, to rejoice for the restoration of all things being effected by the risen Savior who sits at the right hand of God in session, governing the affairs of men, proclaiming this gospel to the poor.

God says that we’re to understand what that means—the gospel to the poor. It sounds strange to us. It’s talked about several times in the scriptures. We’re to understand what social justice really is and how central it is. And we talked about this last week in the first half of the sermon, how central it is to our calling as Christians to do what our Savior began to effect two thousand years ago. And we said that the problem today, and the reason why we’re addressing this topic in the context of the Eighth Word, is one of the largest threats—probably the largest threat—to what the Eighth Word tries to protect: private property. It is a concept in Christian churches today known as social justice, and that then becomes enacted in the laws of the state and in effect kills the golden goose.

I promised you I would give a small list of things you could do practically on this week’s outline, which is on the second page. Please don’t turn there. But several of them had to do with killing the golden goose. The poor are assisted by godly Christian people who exercise diligence, accumulate wealth, build businesses, and then with those businesses, hire people and employ them. It’s essential to what the Eighth Commandment is helping us to protect—to understand what the scriptures say about the poor.

Proverbs 29:7, New King James Version: “The righteous considers the cause of the poor.” Are we the righteous today? Yeah. What are we to do? We’re to consider the cause of the poor. “The wicked does not understand such knowledge.” There’s only two choices. You either understand the cause of the poor and identify yourself with the righteous ones in Christ, or you don’t care about this stuff, and then you’re identified in Proverbs 29:7 as wicked.

The ESV puts it this way—dangerous translation, but an interesting one. The ESV is generally a very good translation. It says this: “A righteous man knows the rights of the poor. A wicked man does not understand such knowledge.” Do you know the rights of the poor? And yes, like the term social justice, the term rights is a much abused term as well. But when the scriptures lay out for us, as we just read in the book of Deuteronomy, certain things we’re supposed to do for the poor, it’s probably not too big a leap to then refer to these as the rights of the poor.

And in Proverbs, this particular verse, the cause of the poor, the rights of the poor, is frequently translated from this Hebrew word that means the judgments—the judgments of God relative to the poor. We’re supposed to know that stuff because it’s not ancillary to our task as Christians. It’s central to it. The proclamation of the gospel to the poor.

If we’re walking in the footsteps and speaking the gospel that Jesus spoke, we don’t want to throw that baby—that precious baby of the new creation that Jesus began, that acceptable year in which we live—out with the filthy bathwater of people that would define social justice in non-biblical terms or use biblical terminology but non-biblical goals to try to meet so-called social justice. Yes, it’s a problem. But may the Lord God use these two sermons to caution us not to react against it as laissez-faire free market people that think too bad for the poor—they’re cursed by God or something.

That is not what the scriptures teach. I mean, it can be sometimes; God does indeed grind people to the dust, and that’s what the poor are. But when the Bible talks about the poor, it is normally speaking of people—this is not a judgment of God upon them. This is a particular social state that’s resulted frequently from sins of other people, but resulted from the Fall. So what we’re doing is manifesting that indeed God’s blessing is going out as far as the curse is found.

And that curse is manifested in the kind of poverty that’s described in the scriptures, that we’re supposed to know about and know what we’re supposed to do about some of these things.

So, the first topic of your outline—this is notes from last week’s sermon. You know, we believe in biblical social justice, but not social justice that comes from some sort of idea of society apart from God’s word defining what justice is. That’s the typical way the term is used these days. Social justice is a result of the social contract. Men have come together to form communities. Those communities then define through majority vote what justice is. And that’s social justice. That’s society’s justice. That’s anathema to a believing Christian.

We say that man doesn’t create justice. God’s justice is what man has to consider as he considers his particular calling. Justice doesn’t follow men’s needs, but man needs justice, and he needs to follow particularly God’s justice. And so that’s the way we approach this topic. What do the scriptures say?

An example I mentioned last week: a bunch of church leaders who met with President Obama about the debt limit bill a couple weeks ago, and they have a thing called the Circle of Protection. Let me read a couple of their specific principles. They have eight principles listed. They say this first principle: “The nation needs to substantially reduce future deficits, but not at the expense of hungry and poor people.”

Okay. Well, yeah, we don’t want hungry and poor people to be diminished somehow. So we could sort of say, yeah, maybe that might be an okay statement. How about this one? “Funding focused on reducing poverty should not be cut. It should be made as effective as possible, but not cut.”

Well, what if a program that’s designed to help the poor is hurting the poor? Should that be cut? I mean, we would agree that the goal is to try to proclaim the gospel to the poor and help people, you know, that are not poor because of their own laziness or whatever it is, but to help people in the name of Christ. But we begin to get a little uneasy with some of the principles because it sounds like all they’re really wanting to do is have state-sponsored benevolences that aren’t really dependent at all upon whether people are going to look for work or not, and that somehow thinking that the state can come up with mechanisms that will actually help the poor.

Remember last week I said that where was the Circle of Protection when the presidents—Clinton, Bush, and Obama—all had these policies, and not so much Obama, but had these policies of trying to extend home ownership to the poor? They had a concern for the poor that no doubt was proper and right. And they instituted, you know, programs to pressure banks into making bad loans to the poor. What’s the result?

Remember I said that the result is the poor got poorer in the last five years. Well, the AP reported this week that white net worth is now twenty times black and brown net worth in this country, whereas in 2009, whereas in 2004 it was seven times. So white net worth has gone up threefold. And of course the reason is because black people and Latinos had the bulk of their investments in those homes that they were being pressured to buy, and the government was trying to help them up and make them homeowners. And all it ended up doing was reducing their net worth down to lower levels than whites, which we’ve seen in a number of years.

So it’s just what I said. If we use unbiblical methodology to try to achieve—if we use empire means to achieve biblical goals, right? If we use whatever political means we think might work to effect an end—proclamation of the gospel to the poor—that’s not good enough. That’s not good enough for us. We want to know the goal, but we want to use biblical means to affect that goal. And so some of these principles found in the Circle of Protection document online, we can agree with, but we don’t agree with other principles that indicate that they think the primary mechanism to affect true social justice—biblical social justice—is the civil state. We say it actually is just the reverse.

So that’s what we want to talk about again today. And we’re going to pick up the handout, the outline, halfway down where the little dotted line is, and return to this topic and pick up the second half of the outline. And we’re going to spend a little bit of time looking at Deuteronomy here in a couple of minutes.

And first I wanted to throw in another example. I provided for you the handout from Amos. Last week I talked about the structure of the book of Amos. How it has these opening and ending chapters—first chapter—they don’t show compassion even to conquered kings. They crush them. They rip open pregnant women, et cetera. And at the end of Amos, God says his judgments are going to come and destroy them. Although there’s restoration at the end, the prophets are all about the death and resurrection of Israel, pointing to Jesus. But those are the bookends. And in the middle, the concentric sections going into the middle, several of them—most of them—have to do with social justice.

And the one thing I wanted to point out today from that diagram I give you—and if you have your outlines, look on, I think it’s page two. It’s a little busy. My wife does these microstructural analyses of texts that are really fascinating and have helped me tremendously. And for instance, with Amos, she took a few days and did her thing on the book of Amos, and it really all of a sudden brought out some important things.

And particularly I wanted you to see today the relationship between the opening section at chapter 2, verse 6, where he says—and again, here the point is that the judgments of God, from Amos’s perspective, are primarily for abuses of social justice. It’s social injustice that he’s going after, and he says, “I will not revoke the punishment because they sell the righteous for silver and the needy for a pair of sandals.”

Do you see that? It’s boxed. I’m sorry, the boxes are kind of clunky looking, but that’s a boxed text. And that matches at the bottom with chapter 8, that fourth section. And you see in verse 6, “that we may buy the poor for silver and the needy for a pair of sandals.” So we’ve got an observation.

Okay, first of all, all we need to recognize in the first half is that there are three or four transgressions, and I’ve numbered them for you in that first section of chapter 2. And so the two things—buying the righteous, or selling the righteous and selling the poor—are parallelisms. And that’s enough to show us that he’s talking about the righteous poor. Okay.

But then we’ve got further evidence of that in this matching section that replaces the word righteous with the poor. So in the beginning it’s the righteous for silver. Now it’s the poor for silver. So you see, this is the advantage of looking at a text of scripture and sort of seeing the whole thing in connection, and all of a sudden we recognize that the righteous that they were abusing were the poor who were righteous. It wasn’t just righteous people in general.

It also is interesting in this last section because what Amos is going after them for are violations of the Sabbath and then of commerce. They couldn’t wait for the Lord’s day to be over to get back to buying and selling because they were cheating the poor, and as a result enslaving the poor.

Now, the connection of their desire not to keep Sabbath and injustice to the poor is a telling one as well, because in Isaiah 58, the verses that a lot of us know in this church from our beginning, the last two verses, the importance of keeping the Lord’s Sabbath—the Lord’s day rather—what can be seen as sort of an application of the Old Testament Sabbath. The importance of those verses is put in the context of social justice. “This is the fast I’ve chosen.” The same kind of language that Jesus says he came to proclaim in Luke’s Gospel.

“This is the fast I’ve chosen: to loose the bonds.” And we’ve seen in looking at the Ten Words in Exodus and Deuteronomy, the change in Deuteronomy to the Fourth Commandment is a new stress—not just on taking rest, but on giving rest. So the essence of the Lord’s way that we celebrate in this church is to have a heart that wants to go and extend this kind of joy and delight and good news to the poor. That’s what we’re supposed to be motivated by at the end of this day. And that’s the reverse of these wicked people in Amos who couldn’t wait for the Lord’s day to be out of the way—for the Sabbath to be out of the way—so that they could cheat people in economic transactions.

So it’s really important for us. I was, again, going back to the Q conference, there was a man who spoke, and he has a website. He’s got a book called 58, and the website is called live58.org. And what he’s talking about, the 58, is Isaiah 58. And the idea is to try to get Christians to commit to live in terms of Isaiah 58, which is our thing at this church, right? We’ve loved Isaiah 58 since the opening days, and we want to make sure we don’t abstract out the last two verses of it about the Lord’s day and our doing our pleasure and God’s and stuff without seeing their connection to extending biblical social justice, right?

This man thinks that we will end extreme poverty by the year 2030, or by the year 2038. And the evidence is that we’ve cut extreme poverty—and they’ve got measures for this kind of thing, but extreme poverty, not just poverty—extreme poverty. We’ve cut it in half in the last, let’s see, so 1988 to 2011? Twenty-six years? Cut it in half. And he thinks we can do the rest of the second half in the next twenty-six years if Christians will see the importance of the poor to the message of the gospel of Jesus Christ and live out Isaiah 58. Isn’t that a cool deal?

And you know the statistics, all the extension of life rates and stuff. He challenged us at the Q gathering with the verse that says, “The poor you’ll always have with you.” He said we’re misinterpreting the verse because Jesus says, “You won’t always have me with you.” But then we know that in the Great Commission he says, “I’ll always be with you.” Which is it?

Well, he wouldn’t always be with those particular people for a period of time. He would be absent from them. He was giving a particular statement in a particular time context. He was not making long-term platitudinous comments about what’s going to happen in the future. And yet, that’s the verse that, according to this man who spoke at Q, most pastors—if you ask them what verse they know about poverty—the one they know is that we can’t get rid of it. How motivating is that?

Remember, we’re postmillennial in our eschatology. And it makes a difference. And it makes a difference if we think we can end poverty. If we think we can actually fulfill what our Savior began with the acceptable year of the Lord.

So, excellent. Excellent. Now, I want to quickly throw in another caveat, though. Another man I was privileged to hear was just this last Thursday at an event, an appreciation event for pastors who are involved in city transformation work. There was maybe forty or fifty of us at a place out on the west side of town, put on by the Luis Palau Association. It was fun talking to Luis again after a number of years.

But they had a fellow there. Oh, I can’t remember the guy’s first name. His name is Chan. Some of you may know him. He’s got—for the first time—he’s a Christian author who has three best-selling books in the top ten for the New York Times non-fiction book list. Amazing. And his current book is in the fourth slot. He’s a friend of Rob Bell. He started Cornerstone Church, a huge megachurch. It became that. Him and his wife started with thirty people, became a megachurch, quit doing that. He’s in San Francisco now. Interesting fellow.

He was friends with Rob Bell. Rob Bell is an emerging pastor guy who sometime this last year decided he didn’t believe in hell anymore. And Chan, this friend of his, that appealed to Chan. He said he wanted to believe Rob Bell, and so he wanted to go back over those texts about hell and reinterpret them. But he couldn’t because the texts are quite clear. The number four best-selling book on the New York Times non-fiction bestselling list is a book called Erasing Hell: A Rebuttal to Rob Bell, a book that promotes the fact that the Christian message has hell as part of it.

And Chan told us at the gathering last Thursday afternoon at the barbecue that, you know, he realized as he did his study on the doctrine of hell that he had become kind of a PR agent for God, who was trying to make God look nicer than he was to people. And he said, “I told God, you know, I’m doing this for you. They won’t like you if they know this other stuff in the Old Testament about you.”

He said, “You know, Noah’s Ark, we always see these cute little pictures, and giraffe heads sticking out the window, and everything’s fun. And you don’t see too many cartoons that have millions of people drowned to death.” The holiness of God, the judgment of God, the justice of God is something we’re ashamed of. We don’t think it’ll work PR-wise. And Chan was very upfront about this. It was so encouraging to hear him talk.

Now, why do I bring this up? Because as we talk about ending extreme poverty, and as we talk about biblical social justice, we must not fall into the trap that I think Chan was in for a while—what I would call humanism—that somehow we think human life is the ultimate value, that the ultimate important thing to us is human life. That leads to social justice theories that want to help everybody indiscriminately and doesn’t recognize that God is rightfully angry and will destroy certain people, send them to hell.

So we don’t want to fall into a humanism. We want to avoid that as we go about understanding what the scriptures teach about social justice.

Now, let’s look at Deuteronomy 24, this text, and do a quick overview of it, just touching on some topics. We need to be Bible heads, right? That’s what we need to be. The coloring page today for kids is the Bible because that’s what we need more than anything else. We need to be people that study these scriptures and read about them—good commentaries, good authors—to know what we’re supposed to do.

I remember years ago when our church first started up, Judge Beers was dying of cancer, and one of the men in our church said, “What should I do? What should I do with my life?” “Don’t do anything,” he said. He was very gruff on his deathbed. “Don’t do anything. Read. That’s what you need to do. Read broad. Read wide. Read deep. Don’t do anything.” Because he knew, and he had seen the Christian church people motivated to do something, and they didn’t know what to do, and so they ran off doing something that would actually hurt the very cause they’re trying to help.

So if we’re going to get involved in social justice, and how could we not given the significance of it—biblical social justice—that means we have to think things through. We have to get ourselves out of this culture’s view of life. And I’ll talk about that in a couple of minutes. We need to be Bible heads.

The first three practical suggestions to you on the list of to-dos on the third page, where this Deuteronomy section is: know the word of God. Know the word of God. Know the word of God. There’s only three things important about real estate. Location. Location. Location. The three most important things about biblical counseling: Investigate. Investigate. Investigate. The three most important things about getting involved in biblical social justice: Know the Bible. Know the Bible. Know the Bible. If you don’t have that, you’ve got nothing. You’ve got nothing except something actually that would be negative—kind of a desire to help but not knowing how the scriptures would teach you how to help. And then you end up doing things that hurt.

All right. So let’s look at Deuteronomy 24. And as I said, it’s got those punishment things before and after. First, God’s punishment through leprosy—God’s judgment—and then human judgments. And that’s the flow of history, right? That’s the flow of history: this flow from God’s judgments to man’s judgments. And so I don’t have them on your outline, but that’s why I read them in context. That’s what’s going on there. And then what we have is several statements surrounding a very interesting central text. I actually got to this section of scripture by the central text—that’s the one I was interested in—and then I looked at its context, and lo and behold, it’s very significant for what we’re talking about.

So look at your handout or your Bibles first at verse 10. So this is the first set of instructions. Now remember, we’re not, you know, we don’t cut and paste. This is given in a particular time of redemptive history. This is given in a particular setting—an agrarian setting, right? So you know, we have to kind of understand the truths that undergird these things and how to apply them. This isn’t a cut and paste this into your life, although a lot of the stuff is pretty practical still.

But what do we want to look at? What’s going on? “When you lend your brother anything, you shall not go into his house to get his pledge. You shall stand outside, and the man to whom you lend shall bring the pledge out to you.”

Well, that right away tells us something about the distribution of benevolences, and that in the midst of distributing benevolences, we want to honor the glory of the other man. Another part of your practical handout is glory, knowledge, life—our worship service, right? You give people glory, you share knowledge with one another, and you get to rejoicing life. You give the poor man glory. You don’t go into his house to get that pledge, right? And you then will bring him to rejoicing life.

But something else is going on here that’s interesting. Verse 12: “If the man is poor, you can’t keep the pledge overnight.” Well, then what that means is the first guy isn’t poor, right? “You lend your brother anything, you shall not go in his house to get the pledge. If he’s poor, you can’t keep that pledge overnight.”

Okay? If it. The Bible here says you’re going to be helping people that aren’t desperately poor, so they only got one blanket left to keep themselves warm. That’s one degree of poverty. But there are other degrees of not quite so poor, becoming poor, that you’re also going to be helping and assisting. Okay?

So right away, the text tells us something very interesting: that according to the Bible, our benevolences and helping the poor involves not just extreme poverty, where people the only thing they’ve got to give you for pledge is the only coat they have to keep them warm. But other sorts of people as well. And in both cases, the text commands us to give them glory. “You want to let him sleep in his own garment and bless you, and it shall be righteousness to you.”

Now, that’s a fascinating verse, too, is it not? Those of you that are pondering some of the whole Federal Vision controversy and righteousness—and what does it mean and what doesn’t it mean?—it’s really interesting because what this says is that in our benevolences, there’s to be an exchange going on. And this is spelled out in more detail in the New Testament, but there’s an exchange. We’re helping someone, and they’re blessing us.

Calvin writes about this quite a bit: that the rich are to help the poor, and the poor are to bless the rich. There’s an exchange principle going on. Ultimately, it’s we’re all poor here at God’s feast, and he’s helping us, and we’re blessing God for the help he’s given to us. That’s what worship is, right? But this exchange goes on, and what’s interesting is this exchange isn’t just a humanistic liturgy. There is a divine liturgical aspect to this, as we mentioned in that book Desiring the Kingdom.

These liturgies are interesting. This was an interesting liturgy this morning—naming is a social liturgy that has great significance, and praise God for the names we see going on in this church. Hey, wonderful. But in this little liturgical back and forth thing, something else is going on. It says, “It shall be righteousness to you before the Lord your God.”

Now, that’s a fascinating statement. We can’t really get into it in depth, but understand the connection—again, to showing grace not just to the extreme poor, but to people that don’t have as much in the community that you live in, your church, whatever—helping them, right, through loans. In this particular case, there’s some relationship of that to you being righteous before the Lord your God. Now, the term righteous can mean being faithful covenantally. There’s nuances to the thing that we could talk about, but whatever it is, whatever the nuances are, the verse says this is righteousness to you before the Lord your God.

Now, the next section’s interesting too, because it’s got a different kind of exchange. So first of all, the whole idea of loaning people at no interest. Then, in verse 14: “You shall not oppress a hired servant who is poor and needy, whether one of your brethren or one of the aliens who is in your land within your gates. Each day you shall give him his wages, and not let the sun go down on it, for he is poor and has set his heart on it.”

Now, there’s a movement amongst the social gospel—more liberal Christians—to get rid of payday loan companies or max out the interest rate on them. And there’s something to be said biblically on it, right? Charging interest to the poor. Payday loans—you can’t get by till your next paycheck comes. So you go to a payday loan company, they charge you some incredible interest rate—twenty-four percent, whatever it is—and then you pay them back when you get paid. But in the meantime, you’ve paid a tremendous big bite of interest.

And in general, you know, in general, we don’t like that kind of stuff because probably it’s poor people that are taking advantage of that. And so we’re not really to charge interest to poor people at all according to the Bible. But usurious interest, big interest, is really tough. On the other hand, it’s a function of the market, and the poor people are telling some of the people lobbying for them, “Hey, we need these payday loan stores, otherwise we’re going to be hungry for the next two weeks.”

Okay, so what’s the solution? Well, this is one possible solution. People who are impoverished and who need money before the next paycheck comes in—two weeks or a month. The Bible says be sensitive to that. See their need for it, and pay them at the end of the day. Don’t wait two weeks. Pay them daily. Very practical suggestion here for Christian businessmen. We were talking at Jonathan and Joanna’s house last night about a possible idea for helping the homeless through establishment of a business. There’s a place in Illinois, I guess, that has done this. People go there and work and get food, et cetera.

And you know, if you have a place that’s trying to economically hire the poor and get them out of their poverty, this is what you should do. Be sensitive to their daily needs. Now, maybe you just want to give them the money up front, but the point is be sensitive to people who live at a level of subsistence that you probably don’t get because you don’t live at that particular place.

So it’s another very practical suggestion of what to do. But look at what the exchange here is. If you don’t do this, if you don’t provide for him his wages that are due to him, it says he then might cry out against you to the Lord. If you help people, they’re going to bless you in exchange. If you don’t help people the way God says to help people, they’re going to cry out to the Lord against you, and it’s not going to be for your blessing. So either way, what you’re doing in terms of biblical social justice is in this exchange thing.

And look at this one now. Just as if you do it right, that’s the righteousness of yours to the Lord your God. And here it will be sin to you. He cries out to God, and it’s sin to you. This thing. So now the imputation of what you do for the poor is affecting either your righteousness standing or your sin standing in the sight of God. That’s very interesting. That’s very interesting.

Okay, dropping down past the center verse. We’ll come back to that. Verse 17: “Don’t pervert the justice suit of the stranger, nor take a widow’s garment as a pledge. You shall remember that you were a slave in Egypt.” And so that’s the next thing, and next practical suggestion in terms of what biblical social justice is. And then the last one of these suggestions begins in verse 19: “When you reap your harvest in your field, forget a sheaf in the field, you shall not go back to get it.”

And if you—again, here, now God will bless you in all your work if you do this. “When you beat your olive trees, you know, don’t take all of the boughs from the upper branches. The olives upper branches—that’s for the poor, the classes of people who are in a vulnerable state.” And then finally, your vineyard. So here, gleaning is another thing.

So we got poor loans, we’ve got timely payments to people on a daily basis who need it. Now we’ve got gleaning capability to people and the maintaining of their justice in the court. These are the major themes in Deuteronomy 24 in terms of the rights, the cause of the poor. And this one also ends by saying remember that you’re a slave in the land of Egypt. So these last two sections each connect at the end with remembering that we were slaves in the land of Egypt—we were mistreated, in other words.

Now, of central importance, I want to return now to the center section. So we got these, you know, you can see it, right? There’s all these lists about what you do to help people out. And then you have this odd middle to it. Right in the center of all that is verse 16: “Fathers shall not be put to death for their children, nor shall children be put to death for their fathers. A person shall be put to death for his own sin.”

What does that have to do with the rest of these verses? Well, in our day and age, it has a tremendous amount to do with the rest of the verses. As you get to know your Bible. Get to know your Bible. Get to know your Bible. This principle articulated in Ezekiel 18. And we won’t take the time to read Ezekiel 18, but I would encourage you to read it. God goes on and on and on. If you got a good father who’s done everything right and his kid turns out to be a loser, the kid dies for his sin, not the dad. It’s not the dad’s fault.

We particularly as a congregation need to hear this. Somehow we think that dad’s responsibility equates to his fault. Some people in our circles who we love think that if the dads just do everything right, the kids will turn out great. Ezekiel 18 is an absolute, in my mind, reputation of that. It says you can have cases where the dad is perfectly good, son is bad, he dies for his sin. And just the reverse goes to the other case. Dad’s bad, kid’s good, kid stands or falls on his own.

And by the way, the definition of who’s good and who’s bad in Ezekiel 18, in terms of the dad, has to do—one of the major sections—with how they treat the poor and specifically whether they loan to the poor at interest or not. So some people abstract that little section out of Ezekiel 18 and think the Bible prohibits all interest. That’s not true. You look at it in context. Read Ezekiel 18 today, and you’ll see that again, a person’s righteousness before God is described in part by his relationship to the poor and is pegged to not charging them interest.

But the point is that Ezekiel goes on and on and on about this, saying in many words what is simply said here: that the father can’t be put to death for the son’s sin, and the son can’t be put to death for the father’s sin. They’re individuals before God. Okay, there’s no great ultimate family setting in all of this stuff. There are family responsibilities, but a person’s responsibility before God is individual.

Now, why is that significant for social justice? Because if you believe in a world that is environmentally determined—if you believe in evolution, let’s say—and you believe that man is a product of his environment, the question is: who do you blame for his particular situation? Who’s responsible first of all? And then who’s he responsible to? And when our culture pushes social justice in the loose sense of the term—moving from social contract to social justice to men determining what justice is—what they’re saying is that really, ultimately, the one who’s responsible is not the individual. It’s the society, or it’s the rich, in the case of America right now.

And they’ve got to pay their fair share. They’ve got to sacrifice. You see, because ultimately they deny this basic principle of biblical justice: that everyone is responsible for themselves and their sin. They deny that. And when you deny that basic principle of biblical justice that everyone is responsible for themselves and their action, then you fall into these ideas of social justice that really are quite anti-Christian—that are a denial of this center.

And I don’t know why God put this in the center of efforts to help the poor. Maybe because of situations just like ours, when Christians need to know their Bibles well enough to believe in the principle of individual responsibility. I’ve seen this in church issues, pastoral issues: in the churches might have problems between two people, and all of a sudden the families aren’t getting along. That’s bad. That’s really bad. God says that, you know, we’re not to be the Hatfields and the McCoys when these things break out.

Rushdoony uses that example in his Institutes of Biblical Law, which by the way was declared by Harold O.J. Brown in 1973 to be the most important Christian book of the year in the pages of Christianity Today. If you don’t know who he is, that’s okay. Big wig. That’s an important book. Institutes of Biblical Law—that’s something you should all read. And Rushdoony talks about this verse and talks about the relationship to blood feuds. It’s the way to put blood feuds to an end. It’s a way to get social justice back into the context of biblical thinking.

We live in a world where people think that through evolution and the environment, everybody has just sort of fallen out. And so if you’re wealthy, it’s not because you were diligent. It’s just the way things turned out. Or if you’re wealthy, it’s suspect, and therefore you have responsibilities that we’re going to take away your wealth and give it to other people. That’s evolutionary, environmentalistic thinking.

And this verse at the center of Deuteronomy 24 instructs us that we have to put—that’s the sea in which we live, folks—is social responsibility for people that are impoverished as opposed to direct responsibility of the people themselves. And then the benevolent actions of private parties, coming alongside of those people, is described in Deuteronomy 24.

So the central text of Deuteronomy 24—how do we help the poor? How do we put a circle of protection around the poor in our present situation in America? It’s to make sure that we’re not holding the rich responsible for the poor’s state. That we’re not blaming other people for the situation they find themselves in. That we each are responsible to God for our own state.

Now, we’ve got community responsibilities to help them. As I just said, that truth is placed in the immediate context of our responsibilities to help people in that state, right? So it cuts off both ditches of the road. It cuts off the ditch of blaming others and holding the rich responsible for helping the poor indiscriminately and through state manipulation. It cuts that ditch off. But it also cuts off the ditch that means the poor are the poor, and that’s that. Who cares?

So it’s a central verse. It’s the heart of the thing. The heart in Deuteronomy 24 of how to help the poor is to understand God’s system of justice: that men are responsible themselves, and they’re not responsible to the state ultimately. They’re responsible to God. Man has to follow God’s justice, not man’s justice following what man decides it to be.

So this is biblical social justice. This prevents us from falling into different ditches. I would encourage you as well in Leviticus 25:35-38—these notes are on your outline. It considers the case of what happens when people get poor in your community. They fall into poverty. They start to have hard times. That’s addressed in the scriptures as well. And so the Bible has a number of things to talk to us about in terms of biblical social justice. And Deuteronomy 24 is a tremendous help to us to understand the central aspect of responsibility.

Who’s responsible and to whom? And as a result of that, also then to engage in biblical social justice.

Maybe just a quick word about the end: Pleasing God. All we’re trying to do ultimately is please God with our actions in this area. And we please the Father when we know his word and can apply that word in the context of our world.

I might just mention there’s a women’s Bible study this Wednesday at Leann M.’s house. I wish that there were more Bible studies in this church. I wish that we were digging into the scriptures more. Folks, if you understand the way the country is going, the only way to gird our loins against the pressures and tides of our age is to know the Bible, to know it well, and to build our relationships around that knowledge of the Bible.

All right, I’ll leave the practical list for you to go through. I think most of it is self-explanatory. I’ve explained glory, knowledge, and life, and I’ve given you here a series of steps you could do to practically today make commitments to follow through and be part of this great proclamation of the year of our Lord, where he produces, pronounces, and then brings to pass liberty. He preaches the gospel to the poor.

Let’s pray. Lord God, we thank you that every Lord’s day here, we pray that your will might be done on earth as it is in heaven. We thank you, Father, for revealing your will in heaven through your scriptures. Now, enable us each in our own small yet significant ways to take part in this great effort to preach the gospel to the poor and to set at liberty those that are held captive. In Jesus’ name we ask it. Amen.

Show Full Transcript (44,600 characters)
Collapse Transcript

COMMUNION HOMILY

Please be seated. Just a brief mention of an item on the outline that’s been there two weeks unexplained. There’s a corporate code for corporations that some people within Christianity are trying to impose on all corporations existing in the United States, and it would essentially make all corporations—it would socialize them all, governmentize them all—because of the definitions that are added in that corporate code.

It’s quoted on your handout. On the other hand, there’s an approach toward businesses today known as the triple bottom line, the three pillars. The triple bottom line stands for people, planet, and profits. Now this was started by a UN standard, I think in the ’60s, fairly recently. But you know, the genetic fallacy is you don’t always worry about where it started. When corporations decide voluntarily to look not just at profits but at the lives of their people and their impact upon the planet that we’re to exercise stewardship over, that’s a good thing.

So it’s two ways of trying to accomplish good goals of helping people, doing the benevolent actions we’ve been talking about, and also of exercising stewardship over the property, the world that God has given to us. One way would produce radical ill effects for people, planet, and certainly profits—the statist corporate code. But the other way, voluntarily entered into by Christian businessmen and women, could be very efficacious in helping understand what a corporation is.

We’re a corpus. We’re a body. That’s what corporation comes from. And this bread is the representation of our corpus, our being part of the body of Jesus Christ. And as a result, unified together in him, we’re this body that’s been brought together. We come together as individual elements of this body for ease of distribution. Some families send up a representative from their family. But just as our text said today, we are each individually responsible to God.

And as we come together in worship, we come as individuals, even though we may come with our families. And when we take the supper, we do so as individuals. It’s not wrong, therefore, to take this into the agape later on and sit with somebody other than your family. You sit with them all week. If you want to sit with your family, it’s great. But I hope you’re not feeling compelled to do that. This supper which flows into our agape is a reminder that this day we celebrate certainly the restored family, but the greater family as well.

There’s beautiful language in our text today. I don’t know if you noticed, but the gleaning laws—aren’t they talking about gleaning three particular kinds of plants, right? Olive plants, grain plants, and a vineyard. And these three things—oil, olive oil, the spirit of God, ministering bread and wine to his people—these things are found in conjunction together everywhere in the scriptures.

It’s beautiful symbolic language that reminds us that we extend help to others because we were slaves in Egypt. God has brought us into his body. He’s given us the Holy Spirit, anointed us with the Spirit of Christ. He causes us to rejoice at this table at the culmination with the drink that produces joy in our hearts. We are spirit-anointed people and we come to partake of the fruit of the field and the fruit of the vine at this table.

Very emblematic of what this text tells us in terms of the gleaning crops that were commanded at that time and are a beautiful symbol of the liturgy that we enter into each Lord’s day. The text also talked about the need not to beat people beyond measure lest he be humiliated. We have this great privilege of olive oil, grapes, and bread because the Lord Jesus Christ submitted himself not just to beating—to that certainly—but to death on the cross to effect the greater Passover, the greater release from sin and death.

These plants were created on the third day, the ones that are mentioned in our text. This is the third day resurrection of the Lord Jesus Christ that we celebrate from his death, his giving himself to be humiliated on the cross and to die for us that we might then be part of the new creation that he gives to us here. We’re the fruitful vine sitting around the table, right? And our children, we’re like God’s children, olive plants around this table as well.

We’re those who have been brought to great joy and production through the work of our Savior. Just before his death, they were eating and Jesus took bread and then he blessed it. Let’s bless this bread. Lord God, we ask for your blessing upon this bread. We bless your holy name for the work of the Lord Jesus Christ, for your great benevolence to us. Father, we thank you for making us one with the body of Christ.

Bless us now as we partake corporately of this sacrament. Give us the grace of the Holy Spirit that we may indeed be affirmed at the bottom of our being that we are one with Christ and each other. In Jesus’ name we ask it. Amen. Please come forward and receive the elements of the supper. We’ll partake of the bread together. You can send a representative from your family or individuals, whichever you wish.

And can it be that I should gain an interest in the Savior’s blood? Died he for me, who caused him pain, for me who him to death pursued? Amazing love, how can it be that thou my God should die for me? Amazing love, how can it be that thou my God should die for me? Thy all the mortal dies. Who can explore his strength? Strange design. In vain, the firstborn sif tries to sound the depths of love divine. His mercy all let earth adore. Let angel minds inquire no more. Lord, amazing love, how can it be that thou my God should die for me?

He left his Father’s throne above, so free, so infinite his grace, humbled himself so great his love and bled for all his chosen grace. His mercy all free. For oh, my God, it found out me. Amazing love, how can it be that thou my God should die for me? Long by the prison’d spirit lay fast bound in sin and nature’s night. A quickening ray I woke, the dungeon flamed with light. My chains fell off. My heart was free. I rose, went forth and followed thee. Amazing love, how can it be that thou my God should die for me?

Q&A SESSION

Q1

**John S.:** I have a question in terms of distribution of alms to the poor. You talked about the truly biblical poor. I’m wondering if our criteria for fencing the table should be a starting point in terms of how the elders distribute alms—you know, you’ve been baptized, you don’t have any charges against you, no unrepentant sin in your life. I don’t know if that makes sense, but it seems like that might be a starting point. Have you thought about that?

**Pastor Tuuri:** Have not thought of it, not thought of it. Want to think about it. You know, because I kind of focused on this relationship of righteousness and needy in the text. And I’ll have this printed out next week, these verses, and show the structure to kind of make that point again.

But partly what we do is we extend grace to people in the name of Christ who aren’t Christians yet, right? So the question is, and they’re kind of like you can think of them as the stranger. Now, the stranger, the sojourner comes because of the nation and it appears that they may be converted or at least they’re drawn to Yahweh and his people.

And so if we have people in the context of the church in that sense, not others, what I’m thinking is that partly what we do with the tithe is to contribute to the work of Love, Inc., love in the name of Christ. And so those people aren’t normally Christians yet, but we’re ministering benevolences to them in the name of Christ.

So I don’t know. Does that make sense? I’ll try to address that next week as I follow up on this week. Do the second half that I didn’t get to.

Q2

**Jana Murray:** So we had the discussion of a coloring page with the twins when they were about seven, and you know, they’d see people by the side of the road and we explained to them why we can’t give money to these people. And they said, “But mommy, it says he’s hungry.”

And so we came up with a way to help them to feel like they’re doing something. And they make up these little bags. They put in like a canned soup and a spoon and a water bottle and a verse. They write out a verse. And that way we have something we can hand these people, you know, with the twenty seconds that we have at a stoplight. And I think it helps our kids to be able to have us not say, “Well, we need to do this” but actually do it.

**Pastor Tuuri:** Yeah, that’s good. Yeah. See, that’s the problem is, you know, normally what kids growing up at RCC tend to hear is, “No, we’re not going to help those guys, you know, and that’s okay. I mean, there’s reasons why we don’t help them.” On the other hand, when they’re small, to try to help them to see that we’re actually trying to help people in a way that’s smart and wise, you know, that’s a positive thing, you know. Yeah, that’s good. I appreciate that example.

Q3

**Questioner:** I’ve often thought that our necessity, our perceived necessity to put corn in our gas tanks instead of our bodies as a relative is related to the extent to which our culture perceives the necessity to convert corn to gas because we choose to worship the earth and therefore not seek our petroleum raw material. And so in our worship of the earth, our false worship of the earth, by not drilling in it and not using it and not taking advantage of it, we therefore are impoverishing the poor and creating more poor. Is that right?

**Pastor Tuuri:** Yeah, I think that’s right in the case of many people. And yeah, that’s a useful perspective. And you know, it’s sort of like, you know, well, if some people have to, you know, go hungry or maybe even die, I guess that’s the sacrifice to the gods of your system.

But I heard Desh Duza—we had him out a few months ago talking about abortion. And he said, and maybe I’ve already talked about this, but such a great example: if you go hunting and you don’t know if what you see in the woods is a guy or a deer, you don’t shoot. But if we don’t know if it’s life in the womb or not, the obvious thing is don’t shoot. But the problem is then you’re going to have all these babies. He said that abortion is the blood price paid for the ability to have sexual license, and so there’s kind of like this sacrifice that has to occur.

And yeah, I think that with, at least in some senses, that ideology of worshiping the earth—and I think that’s true in other cases too. I think it’s just pure crony capitalism at work, you know. I mean, the ethanol people love it. And now, you know, they’ve so manipulated and not produced oil and natural gas. Of course, the gas prices and oil prices have shot up. And so even though the subsidies may disappear shortly, their energy policies have produced a price at which ethanol now is actually financially viable. So the whole thing is just such a mess.

**Questioner:** Good comments. Thank you for that, Pastor Dennis.

Q4

**Roger W.:** I’ve often thought about the fact that when the government takes over all of the programs of helping the poor, we lose that avenue of spreading the gospel because the government surely isn’t going to do it.

**Pastor Tuuri:** Oh, absolutely right. Excellent comment. Yeah. To the—and you know, a couple of things are going on. One, it’s really hard, as Dennis Peacock used to say, to outgive Pharaoh. If Pharaoh is collecting forty, fifty percent of the produce of the economy and then redistributing it to people, real hard to match what he can do.

Number two, when he gives it out, it’s an entitlement. And it’s real hard to try to get people to come requesting benevolence, right? If they can feel entitled to things from the civil government, and by a civil government that takes all of your wealth away, yeah, what reason is there to go to voluntary organizations such as the church?

Q5

**Dennis B.:** First of all, I should of course say I really appreciated the sermon today. You’re very encouraging. Thank you. On the other hand, I really enjoy these kind of sermons that you give to us and it’s very encouraging because I come to understand more and more about a better perspective of justice, I guess I could best summarize. But I kind of have this instant rise of hope in my sine wave of life and then instant fall in my sine wave because it goes from “Yeah, that’s right. That’s great. Yeah, let’s do this” and then it’s like, “Wait a minute, we have all this that’s working against us. I’m just Joe Christian trying to make ends meet and how am I ever going to make things go on?” And my hopes fall. So I guess I don’t know where to go, you know.

**Pastor Tuuri:** Yeah, I know what you mean. And you know, that’s one of the problems with taking the approach I am is that we end up with a long list of to-do items. But I guess what I’m saying is I think that somehow, you know, helping people is at the heart of the Christian faith and the extension of grace. It’s that simple.

That can look a lot of different ways. It can look like with Jana keeping a little thing to give to people. For other people it can mean storing up a portion of your tithe in a little box so that when you do hear of a need every year or two, you’ve got some funds that might actually be able to help. With other people, it’s giving that portion of your tithe to the church and then asking the church what’s going on with the money we’ve been contributing. How are the deacons, you know, identifying needs that we’re helping people out with? And then there’s some other things as well that I’ll talk about next week.

But I don’t mean to—and I know I do, and I know it’s a fault of mine—I don’t mean to just add another thing to the to-do list for you each week. Really, the most important thing I think to leave these texts with is first of all a renewed sense of the grace of God toward us, you know?

And then secondly to have that inform our hearts toward those in need. My daughter was just telling me that, you know, open hearts, open hands—you can’t open your heart unless it’s broken, right? And so, you know, a humble heart before God, a brokenness before God that recognizes his grace to us produces then an openness of heart to help other people wisely. You know, that’s another part of what I was trying to say: don’t be stupid about it, don’t think you can accomplish it through, you know, Washington DC. Wisely. But that attitude of wanting to help is probably the most important thing you could leave today’s service with. Does that help?

**Dennis B.:** Yeah. Thank you.

Q6

**Monte:** Two things. One is an observation. I’ve tried a number of times what Jana was talking about and it was very instructive because some people were very appreciative of both the gift and the attention, and others were angry because you weren’t giving them what they were demanding in the form they wanted it.

**Pastor Tuuri:** Yeah. Yeah. You’ll—it’ll divide it out.

**Monte:** Yeah. I learned a lot by trying things like that. I wanted to ask: Sojourners is still headed by Jim Wallis, isn’t it?

**Pastor Tuuri:** Yeah. He was interviewed on that progressive radio station I mentioned yesterday or this last week. Do you know enough about Wallis to even speculate as to why, you know, doctrinally or, you know, his ecclesiology or anything, why he’s pushed so hard down this path?

I really don’t. I know that he’s been seen as Obama’s spiritual adviser for the last couple of years. And I don’t know anything about Sojourners these days. I know in the old days it was really kind of one of the main opponents of Christian Reconstructionism. It was like two different approaches toward the whole thing. But I really don’t know anything about Wallis specifically. He’s been around a long time. I know that much.

**Monte:** Yeah. And I’ve read some of his earlier stuff and while I didn’t usually agree with it completely, I never found it quite so hard to fathom as what you’re telling us today.

**Pastor Tuuri:** Well, you know, I excerpted out. I actually have some quotes and stuff. The Circle of Protection—they have a website. You can sign up and it’ll show you all the points. These, you know, it’s that’s why I put that third thing in there. There’s biblical terminology. There’s kind of biblical goals of helping the poor somehow. But, you know, if all you have is a goal to do something and you use non-biblical means, it doesn’t work.

So, you know, they may have the best of intentions of helping the poor, but the end result is, you know, they’re like Khan in The Wrath of Khan. They keep shooting and missing their target. You know, they actually make it worse all the time because you can’t use non-biblical means. And I thought his exegesis was horrible, but Rick McKinley from IMO Day—I saw a talk by him. You can’t use, you know, empire means to affect kingdom goals. So you can’t use statist means, I would say, to affect kingdom goals that really are properly done in different ways.

So, you know, good intentions aren’t enough. They’re just not enough. We have to be Bible heads. That’s a term from an old critique of Christian Reconstructionism back when it was a big deal, and I think it was in Christianity Today. The opening page of the article showed Reconstructionists—they have bodies instead of a head. They just got a Bible. And this was supposed to be disparaging, and I’m like, “Yeah, okay, you know, we want to think God’s word in its application to all these issues, and we don’t want to be stupid about it or weaselly about it.” Yeah, you know, all that. I understand that.

You know, lots of people will disagree on how to apply some of these texts from Amos, for instance. But, you know, if you’re working with the text and you’re trying to let the Bible tell us, inform us how to actually go about the work, well, then you can be confident that you’re walking in humility. And I think that’s a big part of the problem.

These evangelical leaders, they still have the terminology, but they’ve lost the definitions. And they certainly lost the idea that the Bible as a whole—part of it is the whole Old Testament, New Testament thing. Gary North had a book that talked about how the Judeo-Christian ethic was a deliberate, he thinks, terminology that came out of German liberal theology to break off the Old Testament and all the laws and specifics there from the New Testament. If all you got is the New Testament, you really don’t know what’s up and what’s down because you’ve lost the moorings for the thing.

So a lot of these people may be well-intentioned, but they’re just working with a very short Bible and they don’t, you know, they don’t have all the data in order to form, you know, a good working understanding of social policy as defined by the Bible. So I’ve rambled on. Sorry.

**Monte:** Thank you.