PEAPAC Recommends: NO

Attempt by one group (sport fishermen) to use government to crush competition; violates biblical justice of one law for everyone.

Summary

Bans non-tribal commercial gillnet fishing on the Columbia River.

Biblical Reasoning

The Bible in part defines justice as having one law applicable to everyone ( Ex. 12:49, L:ev. 24:22, etc.). But this Measure would have the practical effect of injustice, allowing one class to use gillnets while prohibiting another.

Exodus 12:49 — “The Bible in part defines justice as having one law applicable to everyone ( Ex. 12:49, L:ev. 24:22, etc.).”
Leviticus 24:22 — “The Bible in part defines justice as having one law applicable to everyone ( Ex. 12:49, L:ev. 24:22, etc.).”

Election Results

35%
65%
YesNo

Voters rejected the prohibition on commercial gillnet fishing (65% No).

Full PEAPAC Analysis

PEAPAC Commentary: Measure 81 prohibits non-tribal gill net fishing by Oregonians on the Columbia River. This Measure is an attempt on the part of one group of businessmen (the sport fishing industry) to drastically reduce competition from another group of businessmen (the commercial fishermen who use gill nets). It would burden a legitmate commercial business that already is subject to various regulations and restrictions. A group of people representing the various parties who use the Columbia River and its natural resources already regulate both sports fishermen and commercial fishermen, so that both sides can compete fairly. This Measure would eliminate one of these vital partners in the management of Columbia River fish. We need to encourage all forms of private business in Oregon, particularly those that responsibly harvest our natural resources.

While banning Oregon gill netting, this Measure would leave Washington state Columbia River gillnetters in place , meaning that commercial fishing jobs would move from Oregon to Washington state. The Bible in part defines justice as having one law applicable to everyone ( Ex. 12:49, L:ev. 24:22, etc.). But this Measure would have the practical effect of injustice, allowing one class to use gillnets while prohibiting another. We ask you to protect a legitimate Oregon business (and the families profited by it) that is being threatened by overly harsh state regulations. We urge your No vote on Measure 81